Research Article

INVESTIGATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF Vitis vinifera L. BOĞAZKERE

Volume: 28 Number: 2 December 15, 2019
EN

INVESTIGATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF Vitis vinifera L. BOĞAZKERE

Abstract

In this study, extracts from Boğazkere cultivar of Vitis vinifera L. at 10 µL, 50 µL and 100 µL concentrations were tested against 18 different bacterial and fungi strains using disc diffusion (DD) method along with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal/fungisidal concentration (MBC/MFC) tests to reveal possible antimicrobial properties. Then, the obtained results were compared with 18 known antibiotics. The results revealed that 7.33-19.66 mm inhibition zones were obtained for 15-different microorganisms at 100 µL concentrations while those obtained  7.33-12.33 mm inhibition zones for 12 microorganims at 50 µL volume, where no inhibition zone was observed at 10 µL volume addition. The extracts of Boğazkere for the tested concentrations showed no antimicrobial capability against Salmonella kentucky, Enterococcus durans, Salmonella typhimurium and Candida ablicans. MIC tests showed that the extract at 0.039-20 mg/100 mL concentration range was bacteriostatic for the entire tested microorganism. Bactericidal effects of the extract were obtained for Listeria innocua at 10 mg /100 mL while that was 20 mg /100 mL for Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus. The findings show that Boğazkere grape species has antibiotic character, what makes them possible preservatives for food products. 

Keywords

References

  1. Aslankoç R, Demirci D, İnan Ü, Yıldız M, Öztürk A, Çetin M, Savran EŞ and Yılmaz B (2019). The Role Of Antioxidant Enzymes İn Oxidative Stress - Superoxide Dismutase (Sod), Catalase (Cat) And Glutathione Peroxidase (Gpx). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 26(3): 362-369.
  2. Cheeseman KH and Slater TF (1993). An introduction to free radical biochemistry. British Medical Bulletin 49: 481-493.
  3. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ and Collins JJ (2010). How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nature Reviews Microbiology 8(6): 423–435.
  4. Baydar NG, Sağdıç O, Özkan G and Çetin ES (2006). Determination of antibacterial effects and total phenolic contents of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed extracts. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 41: 799-804.
  5. GTB (2015). 2014 Yılı Çekirdeksiz Kuru Üzüm Raporu, T.C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlüğü, Şubat 2015. http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/data/53319ea4487c8eb1e43d72a0/2014%20Kuru%20%C3%9Cz%C3%BCm%20Raporu.pdf/. Access date: 03 .11.2015
  6. Ateş F and Karabat S. (2016). Manisa Bağcılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Sofralık Üzüm Yetiştirmeye Yönelik Kültürel Uygulamalar. [online]http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/manisabagcilik/Belgeler/genelbagcilik/Kalıtelı%20sofralık%20uzum%20yetıstırıcılıgı%20fadıme%20ates.pdf/. Access date: 11.10. 2016
  7. Monagas M, Bartolome B and Gomez-Cordoves C (2005). Updated knowledge about the presence of phenolic compounds in wine. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 45(2): 85-118.
  8. Jayaprakasha G, Selvi T and Sakariah K (2003). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of grape Vitis vinifera seed extracts. Food Research International 36(2): 117-122.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Structural Biology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 15, 2019

Submission Date

October 14, 2019

Acceptance Date

December 9, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 28 Number: 2

Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License