Exploring the Thermal and Electronic Behavior of Actinide Oxides: A Combined DFT and XAFS Study of UO₂ and PuO₂
Abstract
The electronic structure and thermal behavior of uranium dioxide (UO₂) and plutonium dioxide (PuO₂), two critical actinide oxides with significant applications in contemporary technology and nuclear energy, are investigated in the present study. Density Functional Theory (DFT) and X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) spectroscopy are used in conjunction to examine how their electronic and structural properties change with temperature. DFT calculations are used to elucidate the band structures and density of states (DOS) of UO₂ and PuO₂, highlighting the importance of strong electron interactions in their 5f orbitals. XAFS calculations, which are carried out using the FEFF8.2 code, provide insight into the local atomic environment and thermal stability of these materials. The results demonstrated that UO₂ is more thermally stable than PuO₂ and exhibits less structural degradation up to 1000 K. However, PuO₂ reacts more strongly to heat excitation, showing larger atomic displacements and reduced scattering intensity. These findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the interplay between electronic structure, lattice dynamics, and thermal stability in actinide oxides, which is crucial for their application in demanding environments such as nuclear reactors and high-temperature electronics.
Keywords
Actinide oxides, Uranium dioxide (UO₂), Plutonium dioxide (PuO₂), XAFS, Electronic structure
Ethical Statement
The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- Khot, P. M., Nehete, Y. G., Fulzele, A. K., Baghra, C., Mishra, A. K., Afzal, M., Panakkal, J. P., Kamath, H. S., & Zinkle, S. J. (2012). Radiation effects in nuclear materials. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 420(1–3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.006
- Baliga, B. J. (2010). Fundamentals of power semiconductor devices. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Ozkendir, O. M. (2010). Electronic structure analysis of USiO4. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 53(5), 903–906. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/53/5/21
- Becquerel, H. (1896). Sur les radiations émises par phosphorescence. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 122, 420–421.
- Curie, M., & Curie, P. (1898). Sur une nouvelle substance fortement radioactive contenue dans la pechblende. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 127, 175–178.
- Grønvold, F. (1955). High-temperature X-ray study of uranium oxides in the UO2-U3O8 region. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 1(5–6), 357–370.
- Davies, D. M., & Martin, J. W. (1961). The effect of inclusions on the fracture of uranium. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 3(2), 201–208.
- Seaborg, G. T. (1946). The transuranium elements. Science, 104(2704), 379–386.
- Morss, L. R., Edelstein, N. M., & Fuger, J. (Eds.). (2006). The chemistry of the actinide and transactinide elements (3rd ed.). Springer.
- Zinkle, S. J., & Busby, J. T. (2009). Structural materials for fission & fusion energy. Materials Today, 12(11), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9