Kamu Destekleri ve İşgücünün Niteliği Üzerine Girişimcilerin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Güney Marmara Örneği

Abstract

Yeni işletme kurma süreci olarak nitelendirilen çağdaş girişimcilik anlayışı ekonomilere dinamizm kazandıran önemli bir faktördür. Dolayısıyla ekonomilerde girişimciliğin bir ölçütünü de yeni işletmeler oluşturmaktadır. Güney Marmara, sahip olduğu sosyoekonomik yapısı ile gelişim potansiyeli yüksek bir bölge olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Çanakkale ve Balıkesir İllerini kapsayan Güney Marmara Bölgesi’nde girişimciler ekonomik faaliyetlerde bulunarak ülke ekonomisine katkıda bulunmaktadırlar. Çalışmada Güney Marmara’da faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin yapısı, girişimcilerin işgücünün niteliği ve kamunun sağladığı girişimcilik destekleri ile ilgili görüşleri üzerine bir alan araştırması yürütülmüştür. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre Güney Marmara’da faaliyet gösteren girişimcilerin istihdam yaratma yönelimleri yüksek ve kamunun sağladığı desteklerden memnun oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır

Keywords

• Girişimcilik, Güney Marmara, İstihdam, Girişimcilik Destekleri…

Abstract

Contemporary entrepreneurship concept is described as the process of creating new businesses and this is an important factor that gives economies dynamism. Therefore, entrepreneurship activites of an economy can be inferred from the existing new businesses. South Marmara Region comes fore with its socio-economical structure that has high potential of development. Entrepreneurs in the region that consists of Balıkesir and Canakkale provinces conduct entrepreneurship activities and contribute greatly to the national economy. The study aims to explore business formation, opinions of entrepreneurs about labor force characteristics and state support for entrepreneurship in South Marmara Region by conducting a field study. The study reveals that entrepreneurs in the region have high levels of employment orientation and satisfied with the support given by the state.

Keywords

• Entrepreneurship, South Marmara Region, Employment, Entrepreneurship Support…

References

1. Audretsch, David B. (2013) “Entrepreneurship and Competition Policy”, The International Handbook of Competition Second Edition, (Ed. Manfred Neumann, Jürgen Veigand), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 88-107.
2. Audretsch, David B. et. al., (2012) “Local Entreprenurship in Context”, Regional Studies, 46:3, pp. 379-389.
3. Audretsch, David B., (2012) “Entrepreneurship Research”, Management Decision, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 755-764.
4. Bednarova, Dagmar (2011) “Managers of Small and Medium Enterprises Experience and Approaches to Business Conditions in South Bohemian Region”, Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, The Scientific Journal For Economics, Management and Trade, Ceske Budejovice, XIV., (1), pp. 63-68.
5. Bruyat, Chirstian, Pierre-Andre Julien, (2000) “Defining the Field of Research in Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, Elsevier, 2000, pp. 165-180.
6. Chatterji Aaron, Edward L. Glaeser, William R. Kerr, (2013) “Clusters of Entrepreneurship and Innovation”, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 19013, May, pp. 1-37.
7. Clayton, Richard L. et al., (2013) “High-Employment Growth Firms: Defining and Counting Them”, Monthly Labor Review, June, pp. 1-13.
8. Cullen, John B., Jean L. Johnson and K. Praveen Parboteeah, (2013) “National Rates of Opportunity Entrepreneurship Activity: Insights From Institutional Anomie Theory”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Baylor Universtiy, DOI:10.1111/etap.12018, January, pp. 1-32.

9. GMKA, (2012) “Güney Marmara’nın Kalkınmasında İtici Güç: İhracat”, GM Dergi, Yıl 1, Sayı 1, Şubat, s.4.
10. Haltiwanger, John C., Ron S. Jarmin and Javier Miranda, (2010) “Who Creates Jobs? Small Vs. Large Vs. Young”, National Bureau of Research, Working Paper 16300, pp. 1-51.
11. Klapper, Leora, Raphael Amit and Mauro F. Guillen, (2008) “Entrepreneurship and Firm Formation across Countries”, International Differences in Entrepreneurship, (Ed. Josh Lerner and Antoinette Schoar ), University of Chicago Press, National Bureau of Research, pp. 129-158.
12. Klein, Jordan (2010) “Assessing the Needs of Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs in San Francisco”, San Francisco, Office of Economic and Workforce Development Department Report, June, pp. 1-34.
13. Kumar, S. N. Arjun, (2012) “Entrepreneurial Spirit and Motivation in Small Scale Industries: A Study of Mahabubnagar Districts, AP, India”, International Conference on Technology and Business Management, March 26-28, 2012, pp. 171-175.
14. Lichtarski, Jan and Czeslaw Zajac, (2010) “ Opinions of Entrepreneurs and Managers on Management Improvement in Enterprises of Different Size Classes”, Organization Management, No. 1, 2010, 139, pp. 45-57.
15. Low, Sarah A. and Andrew M. Isserman, (2013) “Where Are the Innovative Entrepreneurs? Identifying Innovative Industries and Measuring Innovative Entrepreneurship”, International Regional Science Review, 30 April, pp. 1-31.
16. Lundström, Anders et al., (2013) “Measuring the Costs and Coverage of SME and Entrepreneurship Policy: A Pioneering Study”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Baylor University, Doi: 10.1111/etap.12037, May, 2013, pp. 1-17.
17. Miller, Danny and Cyrille Sardais, (2013) “Bifircation Time: How Entrepreneurs Reconcile the Paradoxical Demands of the Job”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Baylor University, 2013, 1042-2587, June, pp. 1-24.
18. O’Connor, Allan, (2013) “A Conceptual Framework for Entrepreneurship Education Policy: Meeting Government and Economic Purposes”, Journal of Business Venturing 28, pp. 546-563.
19. OECD, (2013) Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2013 An OECD Scoreboard, May, p.23.
20. Qian, Haifeng, Zoltan J. Acs and Roger R. Stough, (2013) “Regional Systems of Entrepreneurship: the Nexus of Human Capital, Knowledge and New Firm Formation”, Journal of Economic Geography, 13, pp. 559-587.
21. Short, Jeremy C. Short, David J. Ketchen, Jr, Christopher L. Shook and R. Duane Ireland, (2010) “The Concept Opportunity in Entrpreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges”, Journal of Management, 36:40, pp. 40-65.
22. Taşkan, Pınar, (2006) “İstatistiki Bölge Birimleri Sınıflandırması (İBBS)”, TÜİK Sunumu, Ankara, 20-22 Aralık, ss. 1-31. TÜİK, (2013) Adrese Dayalı Nüfus http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/ adnksdagitapp/ adnks.zul, Erişim Tarihi: 25 Mart 2013. Kayıt Sistemi Veritabanı,
23. TUİK, (2010) Bölgesel Göstergeler TR22 Balıkesir, Çanakkale, 2010, Ankara, 2011, s.VI-IX.
24. Vivarelli, Marco (2013) “Is Entrepreneurship Necessarily Good? Microeconomic Evidence From Developed and Developing Countries”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Advance Access Published February 14, 2013, doi: 10.1093/icc/dtt005, pp. 1-43.