“Reel” Küreselleşme veya Küreselleşmenin Realitesi

Abstract

Abstract

In the paper, after it is stated that there is no doubt about the reality of globalization process, it is examined with a critical point of view by drawing attention to the fact of the problem of how to explain this process is stil so controversial. The discussion is aimed to be put into consideration with two basic arguments: The first one is based on the reality of despite globalization has various dimensions, the dimension of “market globalization” leads among them in terms of the problems it causes; but this argument doesn’t see enough any explainings such as market or even capital globalization to reflect the reality. Therefore, the market globalization is discussed, just like the other concepts being used in our life, as a conceptualization reflecting both the reality and also hiding it and the necessity of questioning the ideology that it is based on as much as the concept of globalization itself and the rethoric it uses. The second discussion is about defining the basic characteristics of “market” globalization

References

1. Akyüz, Y.; Flassbeck, H.; Wright, R.K. (2003), “Küreselleşme, Eşitsizlik ve İşgücü Piyasası”, İktisat Üzerine Yazılar 1-Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar,der. A.H.Köse; F. Şenses; E. Yeldan, İletişim Yay. İstanbul.
2. Bauman, Z. (1998), Globalization, Cambridge
3. Braudel, F. (1996), Medeniyet ve Kapitalizm, İz Yay. İstanbul.
4. Beck, U. (1997), What is Globalization?, Polity Pres, Cambridge.
5. Boratav, K.(2003), Türkiye İktisat Tarihi, 7. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara
6. Chomsky, N. (2000), Dünya Düzeni: Eskisi Yenisi, Metis Yay. İstanbul.
7. Clark, I. (2000), Globalization and Fragmentation, Oxford University Pres.
8. Falk, R. (2001), Yırtıcı Küreselleşme, Küre Yayınları, İstanbul.

9. Fukayama, F. (tarihsiz), Tarihin Sonu mu?, Rey Yayıncılık, Kayseri.
10. George V.; Wilding, P. ( 2002, Globalization and Human Welfare, Palgrave, London.
11. Giddens, A. (2000), Elimizden Kaçıp Giden Dünya, Alfa, İstanbul.
12. Gilpin, R. ( 2000), The Challenge of The Global Capitalism, Princeton University Pres.
13. Habermas, J. (2001), “Why Europe Needs a Constitution”, The Left Review, 11, September-October
14. Hard M.; Negri A. (2001), İmparatorluk, Ayrıntı Yay. İstanbul.
15. Held, D. (1990), The Contemporary Polarization of Democratic Theory: The Case for a Third Way”, New Developments in Political Science, der. Adrian Leftwich, Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Heilbroner, R., (1996), “Evrensel Bilim Olarak İktisat”, İktisatta Yöntem Tartışmaları, (der) Ömer Demir, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
17. Hirst P ve Thompson G. (1996), Globalization in Question, Polity Pres, Cambridge.
18. Jacobi, O. (2000) “Transnational trade union cooperation at global and European level- opportunities and obstacles”, Transfer, 1.
19. İnsel , A., (1993), İktisat İdeolojisinin Eleştirisi, Birikim yayınları, İstanbul.
20. Köse, A.H.; Öncü, A. (2003), “İktisadın Piyasası, Kapitalizmin Ekonomisi”, ”, İktisat Üzerine Yazılar 1-Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar,der. A.H.Köse; F. Şenses; E. Yeldan, İletişim Yay. İstanbul.
21. Latouche, S. (1993), Dünyanın Batılılaşması, Ayrıntı Yay. İstanbul.
22. Liebfried S.; Pierson P. (2000), “Social Policy”, Policy-Making in the European Union, (der) Wallace H. ve Wallace W. Oxford University Press, Newyork.
23. Lockwood, D. (1999), “Civic Integration and Social Cohesion”, Capitalism and Social Cohesion, Palgrave, Macmillan, London.
24. Marx K.; Engels F. (1976), Seçme Yapıtlar, Sol Yayınları, Ankara.
25. McGrew, A., (2002), “Between Two Worlds: Europe in A Globalizing Era”, Government and Oppostion, Summer cilt 37 (3).
26. Mishra, R. (1998), “Beyond the Nation State: Social Policy in an Age of Globalization”, Social Policy and Administration, 32 (5).
27. Mishra, R. (2001), “Alternatives to Neoliberalism: Change and choice in welfare globalization”, http://www.richis.org/healh/2001/sp091340.pfd.
28. Moore, M. (2003), Sınırların Olmadığı Dünya, CSA Yayın ajansı, İstanbul.
29. Munck, Ronaldo (2003); Marx@2000-Geç Marksist Perspektifler, Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul.
30. Ohmae, K. (1990), The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy, Fontana, London. ,
31. Olofsson, G. (1999), “Embeddedness and Integration”, Capitalism and Social Cohesion, Palgrave, Macmillan, London.
32. Petersmann, E.U. (2003); “Time for a United Nations ‘Global Compact” For Integrating Human Rights into http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol13/No3/art1.html.
33. Petrella, R. (1996), “Globalization and internationalization. The dynamics of emerging world order” State Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization, der. R. Boyer ve D. Drache, London; Routledge.
34. Petras, J. (2003), Küreselleşme ve İmparatorluk, Cosmopolitik Kitaplığı, İstanbul.
35. Pierson, P.; Liebfried, S. (1996), “Welfare state limits to globalization”, Politics and Society, 26 (4).
36. Pieterse, J. N. (1999), “Europe, Travelling Light: Europeanization and Globalization”, The European Legacy, Vol 4, (3).
37. Polanyi, K. (2000), Büyük Dönüşüm, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
38. Patomaki, H. (2001), Democratising Globalisation,The Leverage of the Tobin Tax, Zed Book, London.
39. Rhodes, M. (1996) “Globalization And West European Welfare States: A Critical Review Of Recent Debates”, Journal Of European Social Policy, 6 (4).
40. Rodrik, R.(2000), Yeni Küreselleşen Ekonomi ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler, Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul, 2000.
41. Robertson, R. (1992), Globalization-Social Theory and Global Culture, Sage Publications.
42. Rawls, J., (2001), Collected Papers, (der) Samuel Freeman, Harvard University Press.
43. Sapancalı, F., (2003), Sosyal Dışlanma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİB Fakültesi Yayını, İzmir.
44. Schedler, A. (1997), “Introduction: Antipolitics-Closing and Colonizing The Public Sphere”, The End of Politics, Andreas Schedler (Der), Macmillan Press, UK.
45. Sen, Amartya, (1987), On Ethics and Economics, The Royel Lectures, Blackwell, Oxford.
46. Schedler, A. (1997), “Introduction: Antipolitics-Closing and Colonizing The Public Sphere”, The End of Politics, Andreas Schedler (Der), Macmillan Press, UK.
47. Shaw, M. (2000), Theory of the Global State, Cambridge University Pres.
48. Shutt, H. (2003), Yeni Bir Demokrasi, İflas Etmiş Dünya Düzenine Alternatifler, Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul.
49. Stevenson, T. (2002), “Globalization: Marketization and Power”, Scandanivian Political Studies, 25 (3).
50. Stiglitz J. (2002), Küreselleşme-Büyük Hayal Kırıklığı, Plan B, İstanbul.
51. Sweezy, P. (2004), “Finans kapitalin yükselişiyle güç odağı yer değiştirdi”, İktisat Dergisi, S.451
52. Tobin, J. (1978), “A Proposal for Monetary Reform”, The Eastern Economic Journal, (4).
53. Yeldan, E. (2003), “Neoliberalizmin ideolojik bir söylemi olarak küreselleşme”, İktisat Üzerine Yazılar 1-Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar,der. A.H.Köse; F. Şenses; E. Yeldan, İletişim Yay. İstanbul.
54. Yeates, N. (2002), “Globalization and Social Policy”, Global Social Policy, 2 (1). Yılmaz, Ferudun, (2002/2003), “İktisat ve Sosyoloji, Rakip Kardeşlerin Hakimiyet Kavgası”, Toplum ve Bilim (95).
55. Wallerstein, I. (1992), Tarihsel Kapitalizm, Metis Yay. İstanbul.
56. Wallerstein, I. (1998), Liberalizmden Sonra, Metis Yay. İstanbul.
57. Wivel, A (2004), “The Power Politics of Peace: Exploring the Link Between Globalization and European Integration from a Realist Perspective”, Journal of the Nordic International, Vol 39 (1).
58. Wood, E.M. (2003), Kapitalizm Demokrasiye Karşı, Tarihsel Maddeciliğin Yeniden Yorumu, İletişim, İstanbul.
59. World Bank, (2000), World Development Report 1999/2000, Oxford University Press,.