BibTex RIS Cite

Eşitlik mi Ayrımcılık mı? Türkiye’de Sosyal Devlet, Cinsiyet Eşitliği Politikaları ve Kadın İstihdamı

Year 2009, Volume: 2 Issue: 21, 41 - 54, 01.01.2009

Saniye Dedeoğlu

Abstract

References

  • Bonoli, G. (1997) Classifying Welfare States: a Two Dimensional Approach Journal of Social Policy .26 (3):351-372
  • Booth, Christine ve Cinnamon Bennett (2002) ‘Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a New Conception and Practice of Equal Opportunities?’ European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, 430-446
  • Buğra, Ayşe ve Çağlar Keyder (2003) New Poverty and Changing Welfare Regime of Turkey, Report Prepared for United Nations Development Programme, UNDP, Ankara
  • Buğra, Ayşe ve Çağlar Keyder (2006) ‘The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation’, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 3, 211-228
  • Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (2007) Aile ve İş Yaşamının Uyumlaştırılması Çalışma Grubu Raporu, Yenileşme ve Değişim için Türkiye’de Sosyal Diyaloğu Güçlendirme Projesi, Avrupa Birliği Koordinasyon Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Hantrais, Linda (2000) ‘From Equal Pay to Reconciliation of Employment and Family Life’ Linda Hantaris (ed) Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life, Palgrave: New York.
  • Hobson, Barbara (1994) ‘Solo mothers, social policy regimes, and the logics of gender’ in Diane Sainsbury (ed) Gendering Welfare States. (London: Sage).
  • Jensen, Jane (1997) ‘Who cares? Gender and welfare regimes’, Social Politics, 4, 2, 182-187.
  • Kadın Örgütleri Basın Açıklaması (2006)
  • Lewis, Jane (1992) 'Gender and the development of welfare regimes' Journal of European Social Policy, 3, 159-73.
  • Orloff, Ann Shola (1993) ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: State policies and gender relations in comparative perspective’, American Sociological Review, 58, 3, 303-328.
  • Rees, Teresa (1998) Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training and Labour Market Policies. (London: Routledge).
  • Ruggie, Mary (1984). The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press.
  • Sainsbury, Diane (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Toksöz, Gülay (2007) Türkiye’de Kadın İstihdam Durumu Raporu, ILO, Ankara.
  • Uçan Süpürge (2005)Dördüncü ve Beşinci Dönem Birleştirilmiş Periyodik Ülke Raporu’na İlişkin CEDAW- Türkiye Gölge Raporu, 20 Ocak 2005.
  • Verloo, Mieke (2005) ‘Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality’, Social Politics, 12, 3, 344-365.
  • Walby, Sylvia (2001) ‘From gendered welfare state to gender regimes: National differences, convergence or re-structuring?’ Paper presented to to Gender and Society Group, Stockholm University.
  • Walby, Sylvia (2005) ‘Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice’, Social Politics, 12, 3, 1-25.

Year 2009, Volume: 2 Issue: 21, 41 - 54, 01.01.2009

Saniye Dedeoğlu

Abstract

The rate of female employment has disproportionately been low in Turkey with comparison to EU countries while the rate of female inactivity has again been disproportionately high. The joint of effect of the rural-urban migration since the 1950s and the limited employment creation capacity of the Turkish economy are seen as reasons for the withdrawal of women from the labour force and the resultant high female inactivity. Within this structure there are neither gender sensitive macro-economic policies nor government initiative to stimulate the demand for women’s labour and to generate gender equality in the labour market. In Turkey, the Labour Law enacted in 2003, despite some remaining problems, operates parallel with the gender equality directives of the EU. Yet, in such areas as maternity leave, pension and benefit systems implementation lags behind and concrete policies have, so far, hardly been effective in bringing gender equality at the workplace and in the labour market. Thus, this article aims to provide a critical discussion of the implications of gender equality policies on women’s employment in Turkey and to assess whether these policies will positively affect and bring those inactive women into the labour market.

References

  • Bonoli, G. (1997) Classifying Welfare States: a Two Dimensional Approach Journal of Social Policy .26 (3):351-372
  • Booth, Christine ve Cinnamon Bennett (2002) ‘Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a New Conception and Practice of Equal Opportunities?’ European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, 430-446
  • Buğra, Ayşe ve Çağlar Keyder (2003) New Poverty and Changing Welfare Regime of Turkey, Report Prepared for United Nations Development Programme, UNDP, Ankara
  • Buğra, Ayşe ve Çağlar Keyder (2006) ‘The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation’, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 3, 211-228
  • Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (2007) Aile ve İş Yaşamının Uyumlaştırılması Çalışma Grubu Raporu, Yenileşme ve Değişim için Türkiye’de Sosyal Diyaloğu Güçlendirme Projesi, Avrupa Birliği Koordinasyon Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Hantrais, Linda (2000) ‘From Equal Pay to Reconciliation of Employment and Family Life’ Linda Hantaris (ed) Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life, Palgrave: New York.
  • Hobson, Barbara (1994) ‘Solo mothers, social policy regimes, and the logics of gender’ in Diane Sainsbury (ed) Gendering Welfare States. (London: Sage).
  • Jensen, Jane (1997) ‘Who cares? Gender and welfare regimes’, Social Politics, 4, 2, 182-187.
  • Kadın Örgütleri Basın Açıklaması (2006)
  • Lewis, Jane (1992) 'Gender and the development of welfare regimes' Journal of European Social Policy, 3, 159-73.
  • Orloff, Ann Shola (1993) ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: State policies and gender relations in comparative perspective’, American Sociological Review, 58, 3, 303-328.
  • Rees, Teresa (1998) Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training and Labour Market Policies. (London: Routledge).
  • Ruggie, Mary (1984). The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press.
  • Sainsbury, Diane (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Toksöz, Gülay (2007) Türkiye’de Kadın İstihdam Durumu Raporu, ILO, Ankara.
  • Uçan Süpürge (2005)Dördüncü ve Beşinci Dönem Birleştirilmiş Periyodik Ülke Raporu’na İlişkin CEDAW- Türkiye Gölge Raporu, 20 Ocak 2005.
  • Verloo, Mieke (2005) ‘Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality’, Social Politics, 12, 3, 344-365.
  • Walby, Sylvia (2001) ‘From gendered welfare state to gender regimes: National differences, convergence or re-structuring?’ Paper presented to to Gender and Society Group, Stockholm University.
  • Walby, Sylvia (2005) ‘Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice’, Social Politics, 12, 3, 1-25.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Saniye Dedeoğlu This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 2 Issue: 21

Cite

APA Dedeoğlu, S. (2009). Eşitlik mi Ayrımcılık mı? Türkiye’de Sosyal Devlet, Cinsiyet Eşitliği Politikaları ve Kadın İstihdamı. Çalışma Ve Toplum, 2(21), 41-54.
muratozverister@gmail.com
dergicalismavetoplum@gmail.com
www.calismatoplum.org