Türkiye'de Gençlerin ve Yetişkinlerin İnsana Yakışır ve İnsana Yakışmayan İşgücü Piyasası Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması: Pandemi Öncesi ve Pandemi Sonrası Dönemlerin Ampirik Bir Analizi

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 85

Taylan Akgül

https://doi.org/10.54752/ct.1598585

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de gençler ve yetişkinler arasında, pandemi öncesi ve sonrası dönemlerde "insana yakışır" ve "insana yakışmayan" istihdam arasındaki farklılıklara odaklanmaktadır. 2018-2022 yıllarını kapsayan Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi mikro verilerinden yararlanan araştırma, iş güvenliği, sosyal koruma ve eşit fırsatlar gibi insana yakışır işin temel boyutlarını değerlendirmektedir. 15-24 yaş arası bireyler olarak tanımlanan gençler, işsizlik, güvencesiz işler ve beceri uyumsuzluklarından orantısız bir şekilde etkilenmekte ve bu durum Türkiye'nin işgücü piyasasındaki kritik kırılganlıkları ortaya koymaktadır.
Araştırma sonuçları, gençler ve yetişkinler arasında belirgin eşitsizlikler olduğunu göstermektedir. Gençler, özellikle tarım ve ticaret gibi sektörlerde insana yakışmayan istihdamda aşırı temsil edilmekte ve yetişkinlere kıyasla önemli ücret farklılıkları ile karşılaşmaktadır. COVID-19 pandemisi, bu sorunları daha da kötüleştirmiş, gençler arasında istihdam istikrarsızlığını artırmış ve insana yakışır iş fırsatlarına erişimde daha yavaş bir iyileşme süreci yaşanmasına neden olmuştur. Eğitim düzeyi, insana yakışır istihdama erişimle güçlü bir şekilde ilişkili kritik bir faktör olarak öne çıkmıştır. Ancak, sistematik beceri uyumsuzlukları devam etmekte ve işgücü piyasasına entegrasyonu engellemektedir.
Çalışma, eğitimi iyileştirmeye, becerileri piyasa talepleriyle uyumlu hale getirmeye ve kapsayıcı iş yaratmayı teşvik etmeye yönelik hedefe odaklı politikaların önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu sorunların ele alınması, Türkiye'nin demografik fırsat penceresinden yararlanması, sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyüme sağlaması ve genç iş gücü için daha iyi işgücü piyasası sonuçları elde etmesi açısından hayati öneme sahiptir.

Keywords

İnsana yakışır iş, Ücret farkları, Mikroekonometri, Genç işgücü, COVID-19, Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi

A Comparison of Decent and Non-Decent Labor Market Outcomes of Youth and Adults in Türkiye: An Empirical Analysis of Pre-pandemic and Post-pandemic Periods

Abstract

This study explores the labor market outcomes of youth and adults in Türkiye, focusing on the distinction between decent and non-decent employment during the pre- and post-pandemic periods. Drawing on microdata from the Household Labor Force Survey (2018–2022), the research examines key dimensions of decent work, including job security, social protection, and equal opportunities. Youth, defined as individuals aged 15–24, are disproportionately affected by unemployment, precarious jobs, and skill mismatches, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in Türkiye’s labor market.
The findings reveal stark disparities between youth and adults. Youth are overrepresented in non-decent employment, particularly in sectors like agriculture and trade, and face significant wage disparities compared to adults. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated these challenges, with youth experiencing greater employment instability and slower recovery in decent job opportunities. Educational attainment emerged as a pivotal factor, with higher levels correlating strongly with access to decent employment. However, systemic skill mismatches persist, impeding labor market integration.

Keywords

Decent work, Wage gap, Microeconometrics, Young workforce, COVID-19, Household Labor Force Survey

References

• Abdullah Basit and Mansoor Kashif (2024). Employment crisis and decent work deficits for youth in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development (2024) 26:734–758.
• Acar Ahmet Cevat (2020). Effects of COVID-19 Crisis on Employment and Working Arrangements. In Reflections on the Pandemic in the Future of the World. (Ed) Muzaffer Şeker, Ali Özer, Cem Korkut. Turkish Academy of Sciences. Ankara.
• Aldan Altan, Çıraklı Muhammet Enes, Torun Huzeyfe (2021). Covid 19 and the Turkish labor market: Heterogeneous effects across demographic groups. Central Bank Review, 21, 155-163.
• Alkan, I. (2015). “The problematic of youth unemployment in Turkey.” Paper presented at the EY International Congress on Economics II “Growth, Inequality and Poverty” Ankara, Turkey.
• Aisenso Gabriela, Leandro Legaspi, Renée Czerniuk, Viviana Violeta Vicente Miguelez, and Natalia Virgili (2022). Decent Work: Representations and Prospects of Work Among Vulnerable Young Argentine Workers. Emerging AdulthoodVolume 10, Issue 1, February 2022, Pages 42-53.
• Attar M. Aykut (2013). Tackling Youth Unemployment: The Turkish Experience. Working Paper. Legatum Institute’s workshop on Economic Reform. The Future of Iran Series.
• Barford Anna Rachel Coombe, Rachel Proefke (2021). Against the odds: Young people’s high aspirations and societal contributions amid a decent work shortage. Geoforum 121, 162–172.
• Baş Halim, Ersin İrfan & Kalkavan Hakan (2024). Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics.
• Bayırbağ Mustafa Kemal, Asuman Göksel, and Coşku Çelik (2018). Child Poverty and Youth Unemployment in Turkey. Poverty & Public Policy, 10:3.
• Belot, M., Choi, S., Tripodi, E., Broek-Altenburg, E. v. d., Jamison, J. C., & Papageorge, N. W. (2021). Unequal consequences of COVID-9: Representative evidence from six countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(3), 769–783.
• Bloom, D., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009). Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(2), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-009-9039-9
• Christie, Fiona and Swingewood, Adele (2022) The impact of Covid-19 on Young Workers in England: young people navigating insecure work in Greater Manchester during the Covid-19 pandemic. Project Report. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
• Çelik Kezban (2006). Unemployment Experience of Youth in Ankara and Şanlıurfa. PHd Thesis. Middle East Technical University.
• Çelik Kezban and G. Demet Lüküslü (2018) ’Unemployment as a chronic problem facing young people in Turkey’, Research & Policy on Turkey, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–172.
• Dowd, J. B., Ding, X., Akimova, E. T., & Mills, M. C. (2020). Health and inequality: The implications of the COVID 19 pandemic. The British Academy, 1–40.
• Durotoye Adeolu (2014). The Crisis of Youth Unemployment in the MINT Countries: Causes, Consequences and Corrections. European Journal of Business and Management, Vol.6, No.24, 123-136.
• Eichhorst Werner, Marx Paul, Rinne Ulf, Brunner Johannes (2022). Promoting Youth Employment During COVID-19: A Review of Policy Responses. IZA Policy Paper No. 188
• Feldt, Heidi, Lisa Kirtz, Manuel Marx, Nora Nebelung, Verena Vad, Johannes von Stamm (2019). Preparing and accessing decent work amongst rural youth in Cambodia: case study. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
• Gonzalez, S. P., Gardiner, D., & Bausch, J. (2020). Youth and COVID-19: Impacts on jobs, education, rights, and mental well-being. Survey report 2020.
• Groth, H., and May, J. F. (Eds.). (2017). Africa’s Population: In Search of a Demographic Dividend (1st ed. 2017). Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46889-1
• Guimarães Nadya Araujo, Leticia Marteleto, Murillo Marschner Alves de Brito. (2018). The School-to-Work Transition in Brazil: Patterns and Determinants of Young People Trajectories. ILO. Decent Work for Youth.
• Helliwell, J. F., Schellenberg, G., & Fonberg, J. (2020). Life satisfaction in Canada before and during the COVID 19 pandemic. Statistics Canada-Statistique Canada. International Labor Organization (ILO) (2013) Decent work indicators: guidelines for producers and users of statistical and legal framework indicators. ILO Manual Second Version, Geneva
• International Labor Office (2017) Global employment trends for youth 2017: paths to a better working future. International Labor Office, Genava
• Izzi Valeria (2020). Promoting Decent Employment for African Youth as A Peacebuilding Strategy. Evidence Synthesis Paper Series.
• Kalkavan Hakan, Halim Baş, Irfan Ersin, Serkan Eti, Serhat Yüksel. Defining appropriate government strategies to reduce unemployment during Covid-19 pandemics. In: Dincer H, Yüksel S, editors. Management strategies to survive in a competitive environment. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 155–172.
• Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination, Biometrika, Volume 78, Issue 3, September 1991, Pages 691–692, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
• O’Higgins N (2001) Youth unemployment and employment policy: a global perspective. ILO, Geneva.
• Özkubat Gökhan, Üçdoğruk Birecikli Şenay, Selim Sibel (2023). Is COVID-19 an Advantage to Disadvantaged Groups? Evidence from Administrative Data on Working Hours in Turkey. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, JECS 2023; 69: 100-121.
• Sparreboom Theo and Staneva Anita. (2014). Is education the solution to decent work for youth in developing economies? Identifying qualifications mismatch from 28 school-to-work transition surveys. ILO. Work for Youth Publicaiton Series. No.23
• Schmid G (2015) Youth unemployment in India: from a European and transitional labour market point of view (No. 95). IZA Policy Paper
• TEPAV (2017). Mesleki Eğitimde Probleme Dayali Eğitim Modeli: İhtiyaç Analizi ve Pilot Uygulama Sonuçları. Ankara.
• WHO (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. World Health Organization: Regional Office for Europe.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Zhang G, Zhou S, Xia X, et al. Strategic mapping of youth unemployment with interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy DEMATEL based on 2-tuple linguistic values. IEEE Access. 2020;8: 25706–25721.