AI as Public Infrastructure: A Critical Review of the Transition from Tool to Societal Necessity

Year 2025, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 40 - 61, 31.12.2025

Ogtay Ibrahimov

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has ceased to be a collection of discrete tools. It has evolved into a general-purpose cognitive infrastructure that mediates learning, resource allocation, decision-making, and power across economies and polities. AI systems now shape both productivity and institutional legitimacy across finance, healthcare, education, defense, and public administration. This paper conceptualizes AI as Public Infrastructure (AIPI), a governance framework for managing the interface between globally produced AI systems and domestic institutions. AIPI operates as a filter-translation membrane. It channels the inflow of capabilities through cultural, legal, ethical, economic, and contractual layers before embedding them in critical national workflows. Drawing on real-world governance practice, we identify three dominant styles: market-led, state-led, and hybrid. These styles are defined by how authority, accountability, and coordination are distributed across public and private actors. Using country cases, we show the conditions under which AI capabilities cross into public-infrastructure status and warrant infrastructure-grade obligations. For small and mid-tier states, the realistic strategic aim is governed dependence rather than unattainable autonomy. Governed dependence involves the deliberate alignment of imported frontier systems with national priorities and assurance capacity. To operationalize this perspective, we introduce the Infrastructure Status Index (ISI) as a jurisdiction and domain-specific metric. ISI scores a given country-sector pairing on four dimensions: Essentiality, Embeddedness, Legitimacy, and Governance. It answers two questions: (1) has the national capability crossed public-infrastructure thresholds? and (2) where does governance lag adoption? Taken together, the AIPI-ISI frameworks form a national and sectoral design and oversight architecture. They translate diagnosis into clear obligations and pathways for implementation. This enables imported AI to be embedded purposefully and accountably.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence , AI as Public Infrastructure , AI governance , AI-human collaboration , AI Infrastructure Status Index

Ethical Statement

Not applicable. This research does not involve human subjects or primary data collection from individuals.

Supporting Institution

n/a

Project Number

n/a

Thanks

To everybody who encouraged me morally to conduct research and write this paper

References

• S. L. Star, K. Ruhleder, Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces, Information Systems Research 7 (1) (1996) 111–134.
• J. Burrell, How the machine ’thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms, Big Data & Society 3 (1) (2016) 1–12.
• S. U. Noble, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, NYU Press, New York, 2018.
• R. Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2019.
• J. Zittrain, The generative internet, Harvard Law Review 119 (2006) 1974–2040.
• P. Kalluri, Don’t ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair—ask how it shifts power, Nature 583 (2020) 169. 21
• N. Srnicek, Platform Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017.
• Gartner, Ai adoption survey: Enterprise trends and priorities (2024).
• McKinsey & Company, The state of ai in 2024: Global survey results (2024).
• MIT Technology Review, Ai adoption in the enterprise: 2024 benchmarking survey (2024).
• Stack Overflow, Developer survey 2024, https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2024/, accessed December 10, 2025.
• F. Research, The forrester wave: Ai infrastructure platforms, q1 2024 (2024).
• IDC, Worldwide artificial intelligence infrastructure forecast, 2024–2028 (2024).
• Society for Human Resource Management, 2024 talent trends survey: Artificial intelligence in hr (2024).
• European Union, Regulation (eu) 2024/1689 of the european parliament and of the council on artificial intelligence (ai act), Official Journal of the European Union (2024).
• Pew Research Center, Americans’ use of and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (2024).
• European Commission, Europeans’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence (2024).
• C. V´eliz, Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data, Bantam Press, London, 2020.
• S. Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, PublicAffairs, New York, 2019.
• Republic of Azerbaijan, Strategy for the development of the digital economy in the republic of azerbaijan for 2026–2029, https://president.az/az/articles/view/70750, accessed December 19, 2025 (2025).