Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity

Tuğba Ağbaba; H. Hale Kozlu

doi:10.58598/cuhes.1621013

Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity

Öz

Within the scope of the plans made for the protection of rural architectural heritage areas, especially the concepts of vernacular architecture, spirit of the place and local identity should be carefully considered. As a result of interventions made without considering these concepts, it is possible to lose the local identity and the spirit of the settlement area in heritage areas. There are many declarations prepared by international institutions and organizations on this subject. In particular, the studies carried out by ICOMOS on this subject include important determinations that should find their counterparts not only in international platforms but also in national legislation. This study aims to determine the local identity components specific to the settlements that can be defined as rural architectural heritage areas through the definitions of vernacular architecture and spirit of the place defined by ICOMOS and to integrate these three concepts. For this purpose, Ayvalı village in the Cappadocia Region, which is on the World Cultural Heritage List, was selected as the sample research area. The fact that Ayvalı is a rural settlement area where the natural and built environment can be observed together, its ability to carry examples of construction traditions from different periods to the present day without deterioration and the rapid change and transformation capacity of the region are the main reasons for considering this settlement. In this context, firstly the general settlement characteristics and structural character in the area were determined, typology studies were carried out and eight components defining the local identity were defined. These components were compared and matched with ICOMOS's vernacular architecture and spirit of place indicators. Thus, it is aimed that the determined components have high value at national and international levels and that these components can be used as local identity indicators in different rural settlements

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Erciyes University

Kaynakça

Binan, D. (1994). Güzelyurt örneğinde Kapadokya Bölgesi yığma taş konut mimarisinin korunması için bir yöntem araştırması. Doktora Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 359s (Doctoral Thesis)
Berkmen, H. (2015). Cultural heritage study of Avanos, Cappadocia in relation to its waterfront. Megaron, 10 (4), 595-609.
Ertürk, S., & Kaderli, L. (2023). Conservation Initiatives/Assessments in Rock-Carved Churches Specific to the Göreme Saklı Church. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(2), 682-695.
Tuncel, M. (1998). Oluşum çağları. In: Kapadokya (Eds. M. Sözen, M. Tuncel, V. Sevin, U. Esin,M. Darga,O. Tekin, E. Akyürek,S. Rıfat,M. Gülmez,B. Alper, R. Ozil), 16-43. İstanbul: Ayhan Şahenk Vakfı.
Kaderli, L. (2014). Kültürel miras koruma yaklaşımlarının tarihsel gelişimi. TÜBA-KED Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Kültür Envanteri Dergisi, 12, 29-41.
Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, (1983).
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminof, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical world socialization of the self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
Norberg-Schulz, C., (2001). Yer kavramı bağlamında eski yapılarda yapılaşma, Mimarlık Dergisi, 297, 42-43

Erzen, J. N. (2015). Üç Habitus-Yeryüzü, Kent, Yapı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Restitution suggestion for Mardin TatlıDede Mansion. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 4, 61-63.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Restitution suggestion for Mardin TatlıDede Mansion. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 4, 61-63
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Material deteriorations occurring on the facades of the Mor Sergios Bakhos Church. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 4, 48-51.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Material deteriorations occurring on the facades of the Mor Sergios Bakhos Church. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 4, 48-51.
Oktay, D. (2011). Kent kimliğine bütüncül bir bakış, İdealKent, 3, 8-19.
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban related ıdentity: Theory, measurement and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 285–303.
Pol, E. (2002). The theoretical background of the city-ıdentity-sustainability network, Environment and Behavior, 34/1, 8-25.
Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R. & Bacon, J. (2005). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2), 213-225.
Twigger-Ross, C. L. & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and ıdentity processes, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205–220.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.
ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) (1999). Charter on the built vernacular heritage. Mexico
ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) (2008). Québec Declaration on the preservation of the spirit of place. Québec.
ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) (2008). Declaracıón de Foz do Iguaçu. Brasil.
Uçar, M. & Rifaioğlu, M. N. (2011). Yerel kimliğin mekânsal temsili ve Québec kentinde korunması, İdealKent, 3, 62-81.
Hershberger, R. G. (1970). A study of meaning and architecture. London: Routledge.
Psarra, S. (2009). Architecture and narrative: The formation of space and cultural meaning. London: Routledge.
Moore, K. D. (2019). Culture-Meaning-Architecture: Critical reflections on the work of Amos Rapoport. New York: Routledge.
Sezgin, H. (2006). Yöresel konut mimarisi ve Türkiye’deki önerileri hakkında. Tasarım Kuram, 4, 1-20.
Rapaport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Englewood:Prentice Hall.
Kuban, D. (1995). Türk ve İslam Sanatı üzerine denemeler. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
Küçükerman, Ö. (1995). Anadolu mirasında Türk evleri, İstanbul: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Asatekin, G. (2005). Understanding traditional residential architecture in Anatolia. Journal of Architecture, 10 (4), 389–414.
Eldem, S. H. (1984). Türk evi-Osmanlı Dönemi I. İstanbul: Taç Vakfı Yayınları.
Greene, D. (1962). Project: Sprayed plastic house. Archigram, 2, 4-5.
Önür, S., Özkan, S. (1974). Kalın duvar örüntüsü ve Kapadokya'da mimarlık, Mimarlık Dergisi, 127/ 5, 10-16
Kaya, A. Y. & Akdemir, İ. O. (2020). Tüketim, yer ve kimlik bağlamında Kapadokya yöresi. In Kapadokya Araştırmaları İnsan ve Mekân (Eds. Ş. Güngör & F. Adıgüzel), 127-140, Konya: Literatür Academia.
Bilgili, B. (2014). Kapadokya kayalık alanları ve kaya oyma kiliselerinde koruma sorunları. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 333s (Master’s Thesis)
Büyükmıhçı, G. (2006). Kayseri’de Yaşam ve Konut Kültürü. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Yayınları.
UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage.
UNESCO-WHC. (1992). Report of 16th session of the World Heritage Committee
Acar Bilgin, E. (2023). KIRSAL mirasın kültürel peyzaj yaklaşımı ile korunması için bir model önerisi: İznik Gölü Havzası örneği. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa, 385s (Doctoral Thesis).
Council of Europe (1995). Recommendation No R (95) 9 on the integrated conservation of cultural landscape areas as part of landscape policies.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 54-63.
Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 54-63.
Fidel, R. (1984). The case study method: A case study. LISR, 6, 273-288.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Zwain, A. & Bahauddin, A. (2020). Identity formation of the traditional courtyard shop houses interiors: Case study in George Town, Penang. Akademika 90(2), 103-114
Malgorzata S. K. (2014). Interviews as a qualitative research method in management and economics sciences. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12 (3), 297-298.
Türkmen, K. T. (1999). Ürgüp, bilinmeyen Kapadokya'dan bir kesit, Ankara: Ürün Yayınları.
Elmacı, O. (2008). Ürgüp tarihi. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları.
Esmer, M. A, (1992), Avanos’un eski Türk evleri. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Büyükmıhçı, G. (2000). Anadolu’da konut; Nevşehir evleri. Arkitekt, 478, 58-72.
Rudofsky, B. (1964). Architecture without architects: An ıntroduction to nonpedigreed architecture. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
Büyükmıhçı, G. (2000b). Anadolu’da konut; Kayseri evleri. Arkitekt, 490, 55-69

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Kent Tarihi, Yapılı Çevrenin Tarihi ve Teorisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Tuğba Ağbaba
0009-0001-8149-9426
Türkiye

H. Hale Kozlu ^*
0000-0001-6711-3139
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Ocak 2025

Kabul Tarihi

30 Nisan 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1621013

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83PL27YL

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ağbaba, T., & Kozlu, H. H. (2025). Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity. Cultural Heritage and Science, 6(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1621013

AMA

1.Ağbaba T, Kozlu HH. Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity. Cultural Heritage and Science. 2025;6(1):29-44. doi:10.58598/cuhes.1621013

Chicago

Ağbaba, Tuğba, ve H. Hale Kozlu. 2025. “Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity”. Cultural Heritage and Science 6 (1): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1621013.

EndNote

Ağbaba T, Kozlu HH (01 Haziran 2025) Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity. Cultural Heritage and Science 6 1 29–44.

IEEE

[1]T. Ağbaba ve H. H. Kozlu, “Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity”, Cultural Heritage and Science, c. 6, sy 1, ss. 29–44, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.58598/cuhes.1621013.

ISNAD

Ağbaba, Tuğba - Kozlu, H. Hale. “Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity”. Cultural Heritage and Science 6/1 (01 Haziran 2025): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1621013.

JAMA

1.Ağbaba T, Kozlu HH. Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity. Cultural Heritage and Science. 2025;6:29–44.

MLA

Ağbaba, Tuğba, ve H. Hale Kozlu. “Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity”. Cultural Heritage and Science, c. 6, sy 1, Haziran 2025, ss. 29-44, doi:10.58598/cuhes.1621013.

Vancouver

1.Tuğba Ağbaba, H. Hale Kozlu. Traditional houses in Ürgüp/Ayvalı rural heritage area: Vernacular architecture, spirit of place and local identity. Cultural Heritage and Science. 01 Haziran 2025;6(1):29-44. doi:10.58598/cuhes.1621013

Cited By

Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Social Structure of Cultural Heritage-Focused Scientific Studies in Recreation Areas (1991-2024)

Cultural Heritage and Science

https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1798626