Yeni Tip Koronavirüs Salgınının İnşaat Sektörü ve Sektör Profesyonelleri Üzerindeki Sosyal ve Ekonomik Etkileri

Year 2021, Volume: 36 Issue: 2, 317 - 329, 16.08.2021

Olcay Genç

https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaumfd.982762

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Covid-19 salgını gibi beklenmedik bir durumda, durumun anlaşılma derecesinin ve bunun inşaat sektörü ve uygulayıcıları üzerindeki sosyal ve ekonomik etkisinin nasıl tanımlanıp ortaya çıkarılabileceğini göstermektir. Bu nedenle, sektörü ve profesyonellerini bir sonraki olağanüstü duruma hazırlamak için uygulayıcılara öngörü sağlamaktır. Kamu veya özel sektörde çalışan inşaat mühendislerine anket çalışması hazırlanarak bizzat ve İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası aracılığı ile ulaştırılmakta ve ardından karşılaştırmalı bir analiz yapılmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, inşaat mühendislerinin Covid-19'a karşı önlem kurallarına uyduğunu, zorunlu olmadıkça evde kaldıklarını, koronavirüs pandemisinden sonra küresel, ulusal ve aile ekonomileri konusunda son derece endişelendiklerini ve inşaat mühendislerinin büyük çoğunluğunun bir şekilde pandemi sırasında çalışmaya devam ettiklerini ve özel sektör şirketlerinin sadece çok küçük bir kısmının iflas ettiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Ekonomi, Covid-19, Koronavirüs, İnşaat sektörü, Pandemi

The Social and Economic Impacts of Novel Coronavirus Pandemic on Construction Sector and its Professionals

Abstract

The goal of this study is, in an unexpected exceptional situation such as Covid-19 outbreak, to demonstrate how the extent of understanding of the situation and its social and economic impact on the construction sector and on its practitioners can be defined and exposed. Hence, to provide insights to the practitioners to prepare the sector and its professionals for the next extraordinary situation. A questionnaire survey is prepared and delivered personally and via the Chamber of Civil Engineers to the civil engineers who work for public or private sectors, and then a comparative analysis is carried out. The exploratory results of the study show that the civil engineers follow precaution rules against Covid-19, they stay home unless compulsory matters, they are highly concerned about global, national and family economies after coronavirus pandemic and, while the majority of the civil engineers somehow continue working during the pandemic, only a very small portion of the private sector companies bankrupt.

Keywords

Economy, Construction sector, Coronavirus, Covid-19, Pandemic

References

• 1. Richman, D.D., Whitley, R.J., Hayden, F.J., 2016. Clinical Virology, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA.
• 2. WHO, 2015. Summary of Probable SARS Cases with Onset of Illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003, https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/ (accessed April 20, 2020).
• 3. WHO, 2020. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/ (accessed April 20, 2020).
• 4. Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., Cheng, Z., Yu, T., Xia, J., Wei, Y., Wu, W., Xie, X., Yin, W., Li, H., Liu, M., Xiao, Y., Gao, H., Guo, L., Xie, J., Wang, G., Jiang, R., Gao, Z., Jin, Q., Wang, J., Cao, B., 2020. Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China, Lancet, 497-506.
• 5. World Health Organization (WHO), 2020. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report - 1, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 6. Zhang, D., Hu, M., Ji, Q., 2020. Financial Markets Under the Global Pandemic of COVID- 19, Financ. Res. Lett. 101528.
• 7. WHO, 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/nov el-coronavirus-2019 (accessed December 31, 2020).
• 8. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2020. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/ (Accessed December 31, 2020).
• 9. Yu, K.D.S., Aviso, K.B., 2020. Modelling the Economic Impact and Ripple Effects of Disease Outbreaks, Process Integr. Optim. Sustain.
• 10. Şafakli, O.V., 2011. An Overview of the Construction Sector in Northern Cyprus, African Journal of Business Management, 5(35), 13383-13387.
• 11. Giang, D.T.H., Sui Pheng, L., 2011. Role of Construction in Economic Development: Review of Key Concepts in the Past 40 Years, Habitat Int. 35 118–125.
• 12. Leeper, E.M., Walker, T.B., Yang, S.C.S., 2010. Government Investment and Fiscal Stimulus, J. Monet. Econ. 57, 1000–1012.
• 13. Erdis, E., Genç, O., Aydınlı, S., 2019. Mobbing on Construction Professionals: Causes, Consequences, and Precautions, Int. J. Constr. Manag.,
• 14. Çelik, G.T., Oral, E.L., 2016. Big Five and Organizational Commitment-the Case of Turkish Construction Professionals, Hum. Resour. Manag. Res. 6, 6–14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Big-
• 15. Schönbrodt, F.D., Perugini, M., 2013. At What Sample Size do Correlations Stabilize?, J. Res. Pers. 47, 609–612.
• 16. Mazlina Zaira, M., Hadikusumo, B.H.W., 2017. Structural Equation Model of Integrated Safety Intervention Practices Affecting the Safety Behaviour of Workers in the Construction Industry, Saf. Sci. 98, 124–135.
• 17. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D.K., 2015. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 7, 396–403.
• 18. Genç, O., Erdiş, E., Çoşkun, H., 2017. İnşaat Mühendisleri Özelinde Eş Zamanlı Mühendislik Yaklaşımının İrdelenmesi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Derg. 31, 31–38.
• 19. Thompson, C.B., 2009. Descriptive Data Analysis, Air Med. J. 28, 56–59.
• 20. Buchli, J., Righetti, L., Ijspeert, A.J., 2008. Frequency Analysis with Coupled Nonlinear Oscillators, Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 237: 1705–1718.
• 21. Assumpção, A., Pagano, T., Matsutani, L.A., Ferreira, E.A.G., Pereira, C.A.B., Marques, A.P., 2010. Quality of Life and Discriminating Power of Two Questionnaires in Fibromyalgia Patients: Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short- Form Health Survey, Brazilian J. Phys. Ther. 14(4), 284-9.
• 22. Kim, T.K., 2015. T Test as a Parametric Statistic., Korean J. Anesthesiol. 68, 540–6.
• 23. Hall, R.A., Daneshmend, L.K., 2003. Reliability Modelling of Surface Mining Equipment: Data Gathering and Analysis Methodologies, Int. J. Surf. Mining, Reclam. Environ. 17, 139–155.
• 24. Paleari, S., 2019. Disaster Risk Insurance: A Comparison of National Schemes in the EU-28, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 35, 101059.