Year 2015,
Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1239 - 1246, 13.05.2015
Mohammad Taghi Hasanı
,
Mehdi Rasoulı
References
- Beatty, K. (2010).Teaching and researching computer assisted language learning. New York: Longman.
- Box, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. Science Direct Journal, 1 (2), 14-24.
- Fore, M., & Corely, P. (2013). Inclusion Tools: Rosetta stone - a Visual Way to Teach
- Language. Language Learning and Technology, 1 (1), 1-7. Hubbard, Ph. (2006). Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in
- Foreign Language Teaching. Evaluating CALL Software, 1 (1), 1-26. Hubbard, Ph. (2009). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in
- Linguistics. Foundations of CALL, 1 (1). New York: Routledge. Healey, D., & Johnson, N. (Eds.) (2005). TESOL CALL Interest Section software list.
- Retrieved July 16, 2013, from: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/eli/softlist
- Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization.
- Oxford Clarendon Press. Neilson, K. B. (2011). Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: what happens? Language Learning and Technology, 15 (3), 110-129.
- Rosetta Stone [computer software]. available at http://www2.rosettastone.com/en/?a=b Tell Me More [computer software]. Available at http://www.auralog.com/us/tellmemore6_GB.html Ware, J. (2011).The Effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning Programs on Student
- Achievement Scores. Educational Technology &Society, 15 (4), 159-162.
Comparison of Rosetta stone English software vs. Tell Me More English software on Iranian EFL Student Achievement toward English learning
Year 2015,
Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1239 - 1246, 13.05.2015
Mohammad Taghi Hasanı
,
Mehdi Rasoulı
Abstract
Abstract. Tell Me More and Rosetta Stone are considered as two famous language learning soft-wares for learning English. To investigate the significant differences between the effects of Tell Me More and Rosetta Stone on the achievement of the Iranian EFL learners, a sample of 30 Iranian Intermediate level EFL students in Emam Ali Institute of Higher Technical Education Center of Kordkouy in Iran was selected. Then, the participants were randomly assigned to two different treatment conditions. One class received the Rosetta stone English software and the other one received the Tell Me More English software. Two separate Independent-Samples T-test procedures were employed to analyze the obtained data. The results showed that neither of the two groups significantly outperformed the other one in their reading and writing performance. The results also showed no significant difference between the members of the two groups regarding their speaking and listening performance. Thus, in this research study, none of the results could be claimed as significant.
References
- Beatty, K. (2010).Teaching and researching computer assisted language learning. New York: Longman.
- Box, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. Science Direct Journal, 1 (2), 14-24.
- Fore, M., & Corely, P. (2013). Inclusion Tools: Rosetta stone - a Visual Way to Teach
- Language. Language Learning and Technology, 1 (1), 1-7. Hubbard, Ph. (2006). Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in
- Foreign Language Teaching. Evaluating CALL Software, 1 (1), 1-26. Hubbard, Ph. (2009). Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in
- Linguistics. Foundations of CALL, 1 (1). New York: Routledge. Healey, D., & Johnson, N. (Eds.) (2005). TESOL CALL Interest Section software list.
- Retrieved July 16, 2013, from: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/eli/softlist
- Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization.
- Oxford Clarendon Press. Neilson, K. B. (2011). Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: what happens? Language Learning and Technology, 15 (3), 110-129.
- Rosetta Stone [computer software]. available at http://www2.rosettastone.com/en/?a=b Tell Me More [computer software]. Available at http://www.auralog.com/us/tellmemore6_GB.html Ware, J. (2011).The Effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning Programs on Student
- Achievement Scores. Educational Technology &Society, 15 (4), 159-162.