Survey the counterproductive behavior with excitement adjustment and personality traits (Case study: National Oil Company of South Oil)

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1332 - 1339, 13.05.2015

Sahar Shahbazi , Mohammad Feizi

Abstract

Abstract. The present study is to survey the role of excitement cognitive adjustment and identification categories on emerging the counterproductive behavior. For this purpose, 306 samples of engineering management employees and the drilling national company building of Iran South Oil areas were selected using random sampling in order to exploit Corcoran formula. Used data by 3 questionnaires of Bent and Robison's (2003) counterproductive behavior, Persian questionnaire BFI (Oliver and Gohen, 1991) for identity categories, and questionnaire Persian form of cognitive excitement adjustment (2012) was collected and tested by Pearson-correlation test. The study results showed that there has been a meaningful relation in neurosis, empiricism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, blame  himself, coping, positive thinking, blame others, cognitive excitement adjustment except extrovert, but there is a negative relation among empiricism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, blame  himself, coping, positive thinking, blame others, cognitive excitement adjustment and extrovert except neurosis. 

Keywords

counterproductive behavior, cognitive excitement, identity categories

References

• Appelbaum SH, Iaconi GD, Matousek A. 2007. Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: Causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance, 7: 586 -598.
• Aminabadi Z, Khodapanahi M, Dehghani M. 2012. Survey factor structure and validity issue of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Sciences., 117- 109:2.
• Avatifimonfared A, Mehdad A, Mirjafari a, Rezai T. 2012. Relationship of mental health component in workplace with organizational trust and anti-product behavior. Journal of Behavioral Sciences :73-63 :9.
• Arshadi N, Piryai S, Zare R. 2012. The role of moderating role of personality traits in the relationship between perceived ostracism at work and deviant behaviors in workplace. . Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 221-230:3.
• Baghebaniyan A, Khamrnya M. 2013. Survey Deviant behaviors Emam Ali hospital staff job of Zahedan. Medical university journal of Rafsanjan: 408-399:12.
• Costa PT,MacCrae RR.1992.Professional manual: Revised NEO. Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
• Fine S, Horowtiz, I. Weigler, H. Basis L.2010. Is good character good enough? The effect of situational variables on the relationship between integrity and counterproductive work behaviors, Human resource Management Review, 20:73-84
• Gross, J. J., & Munoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical: Science and Practice, 2, 151-164.
• Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and individual differences, , 30, 1311-1327. .
• Garnefski, N., Legerstee, J. Kraaij, V., Kommer T., & Teers; J. (2002). Cognitive coping strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A comparison between adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 603-611.
• Garnefkski, N., Teerds, J. Kraaij,V., Legerstee, J., & Kommer, T. (2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 267-276.
• Golparvar M, Semsar A, Atashpour H. 2012. Big factor role of personality in link between perceived organizational judgments with anti-product behaviors. Contemporary psychology, 14- 1:6.
• Haaland SA. 2002. Understanding organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors: examining interactions utilizing an organizational versus interpersonal categorization strategy. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, the Central Michigan University.
• Khaksar S. 2005. Clustering the anti-product behaviors from the dimension of importance in industrials and organizations employees' view to "corporate crime role". Scientific journal of gradual management: 35-4:21.
• Mount M,Ilies R,Johnson E. 2006. Relationship of personality and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59:591-623.
• Maclane CN,Walmsley PT.2010.Reducing counterproductive work behavior through employee selection. Human Resource Management Review, 20:62-72.
• Mehdad A. 2011. Organizational and industrial psychology, Tehran: Jangal publication.
• Nasresfehani N, Eatemedi A.2012. Character and quality of life in relation to spiritual intelligence Allameh Tabatabai University, 235-226(2) 2.
• Robinson SL,Bennett RJ. 1995. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 555-572.
• Sackett PR, Devore CT .2001. Counterproductive behavior at work. In N Anderson, DS Ones, H K Sinangil, C Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (v.1: Personnel Psychology . London, Sage Publication.
• Salehi A, Bagheban A, Bahrami F, Amadi A. 2012. The relationship between cognitive process of excitement adjustment and emotional problems by considering to personal and family factors. Journal of Family Psychotherapy: 18-1:1.