BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1695 - 1700, 13.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • Avalbaev, A.M; Bezhorkov,M.V; Kildibekova,A.R. and Fatkutdinova, R.A.Wheat Germagglutinin Restores Cell Division and Growth Of Wheat Seedlings Under Salinity. Bulb. J. Plant Physiol, Special Issue, 257-263(2009).
  • Bhatti, M. A; Zulfiqar, A; Bakhsh, A; Razaq, A. and Jamali, A. R. Screening of wheat lines for salinity tolerance. International J of Agriculture and Biology, 6, 627-628(2004).
  • Bray, E. A. Plant response to water deficit trends. Plant Sci, 2, 48-54(2001).
  • Caramer, S.G; Nyquist, W.E. and Walker, W.M. Least significant differencesfor combining analysis of experiments whit two or three factor treatment. Agronomy Journal, 81,665- 672(1989).
  • Condom,A.G;Richards,R.A;Rebetzke,G.g.and Faraquhar,G.D.Improving intrinsic water Use efficencey and crop yield. Crop Sci, 42,122-131(2002).
  • De, F. and kar,K. R. Seed germination and seeding growth of mung been under water stress induced by PEG 6000. Seed seince and technology,23, 301-304(1994).
  • Ellis, R.A. and Roberts, E.H. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Sci. Technol, 9,373-409(1981).
  • Geravand, M. Grain evaluate drought tolerance of cultivars developed in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Plant breeding and seed(2006).
  • Hagighi, R.S. and Milani, M.S. Osmotic and specific ion effects on the seed germination of Isabgol and Psyllium. Journal of Iranian Field Crop Research. 7(1), 97-104(2009).
  • Higgs, K.H. and Jones, H.G. Response of apple rootstocks to irrigation in south–east England. Journal Of Horticultural Science, 65, 129-141(1990).
  • Hoogenbom, G Huck, M. G. and Peterson, C. M., Agron J, 79, 607 (1987).
  • Jaafarzade, M. Four genotypes evaluate drought tolerance in wheat seedling stage. Environmental stress in the second year of Agricultural Sciences, 1( 2006).
  • kaffe, M; Stuart, D.A.Effects of salinity on growth and yield of wheat is not. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,12, 1(2001).
  • Larcher, W. Physiological plant ecology.Third edition( Berlin springer – verlag,1995).
  • Lawlor, D.W. Limitation to photosynthesis in water stressed Leaves: Stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Ann. Bot, 8, 1 (2002)
  • Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R.The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol (1973).
  • Munns, R.Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 25, 659- 671(2002).
  • Okcu,G; Kaya, M.D. and Atak, M. Effect of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum Sativum L.), Turk. J. Agric(2005).
  • Rieger, M. Offsetting effects of reduced root hydraulic conductivity and osmotic adjustment following drought.Tree Physiology, 15, 379-385(1995).
  • Saidi, M. Effect of planting depth and short-term drought on wheat seedling emergence rate of repair and its relationship with germination vigor and drought resistance. Research producers,( 1384).
  • Salehifar, M.Comparison of the effects of water stress on germination and seedling growth of 8 bean genetics. Agronomy and Crop Science Congress eleventh Iran - Shahid Beheshti University(1389).
  • Tanji, K. K. Agricultural salinity assessment and management. Scientific Publisher (Jodhpur,1995).
  • Zeid, I.M., El-Semary, N.A. Response of two differentially drought tolerant varieties of maize to drought stress. Paki-stan J Biologic Sci, 4 (7), 779-784(2001).

The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1695 - 1700, 13.05.2015

Abstract

Abstract. Present study was conducted to investigation the influence of salinity and drought stresses on germination and growing parameters in the wheat (T. aestivum L.) Cultivar (chamran). This experiment was carried out in completely randomized factorial form with three replications in laboratory condition at the initial stage of growing. Treatments were supplied to use of sodium chloride(Na+Cl-) and polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG) solutions in order to impose the salinity and drought stress, which were including control (without sodium chloride) osmotic potentials 75, 150 and 200 mmol/l and control ( without polyethylene glycol) osmotic potentials -0.4, -0.8 and -1.2 bar, respectively. Results indicated that the influence of salinity and drought DOP (different osmotic potential) on the root length, Shoot length, fresh root mass and fresh shoot mass, root dry mass, shoot dry mass, compared to the control were not significant (P≥0.05).the influence of the salinity and drought DOP on germination percentage were not significant. Both of OP (osmotic potential) had no influence on germination rate.

References

  • Avalbaev, A.M; Bezhorkov,M.V; Kildibekova,A.R. and Fatkutdinova, R.A.Wheat Germagglutinin Restores Cell Division and Growth Of Wheat Seedlings Under Salinity. Bulb. J. Plant Physiol, Special Issue, 257-263(2009).
  • Bhatti, M. A; Zulfiqar, A; Bakhsh, A; Razaq, A. and Jamali, A. R. Screening of wheat lines for salinity tolerance. International J of Agriculture and Biology, 6, 627-628(2004).
  • Bray, E. A. Plant response to water deficit trends. Plant Sci, 2, 48-54(2001).
  • Caramer, S.G; Nyquist, W.E. and Walker, W.M. Least significant differencesfor combining analysis of experiments whit two or three factor treatment. Agronomy Journal, 81,665- 672(1989).
  • Condom,A.G;Richards,R.A;Rebetzke,G.g.and Faraquhar,G.D.Improving intrinsic water Use efficencey and crop yield. Crop Sci, 42,122-131(2002).
  • De, F. and kar,K. R. Seed germination and seeding growth of mung been under water stress induced by PEG 6000. Seed seince and technology,23, 301-304(1994).
  • Ellis, R.A. and Roberts, E.H. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Sci. Technol, 9,373-409(1981).
  • Geravand, M. Grain evaluate drought tolerance of cultivars developed in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Plant breeding and seed(2006).
  • Hagighi, R.S. and Milani, M.S. Osmotic and specific ion effects on the seed germination of Isabgol and Psyllium. Journal of Iranian Field Crop Research. 7(1), 97-104(2009).
  • Higgs, K.H. and Jones, H.G. Response of apple rootstocks to irrigation in south–east England. Journal Of Horticultural Science, 65, 129-141(1990).
  • Hoogenbom, G Huck, M. G. and Peterson, C. M., Agron J, 79, 607 (1987).
  • Jaafarzade, M. Four genotypes evaluate drought tolerance in wheat seedling stage. Environmental stress in the second year of Agricultural Sciences, 1( 2006).
  • kaffe, M; Stuart, D.A.Effects of salinity on growth and yield of wheat is not. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,12, 1(2001).
  • Larcher, W. Physiological plant ecology.Third edition( Berlin springer – verlag,1995).
  • Lawlor, D.W. Limitation to photosynthesis in water stressed Leaves: Stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Ann. Bot, 8, 1 (2002)
  • Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R.The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol (1973).
  • Munns, R.Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 25, 659- 671(2002).
  • Okcu,G; Kaya, M.D. and Atak, M. Effect of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum Sativum L.), Turk. J. Agric(2005).
  • Rieger, M. Offsetting effects of reduced root hydraulic conductivity and osmotic adjustment following drought.Tree Physiology, 15, 379-385(1995).
  • Saidi, M. Effect of planting depth and short-term drought on wheat seedling emergence rate of repair and its relationship with germination vigor and drought resistance. Research producers,( 1384).
  • Salehifar, M.Comparison of the effects of water stress on germination and seedling growth of 8 bean genetics. Agronomy and Crop Science Congress eleventh Iran - Shahid Beheshti University(1389).
  • Tanji, K. K. Agricultural salinity assessment and management. Scientific Publisher (Jodhpur,1995).
  • Zeid, I.M., El-Semary, N.A. Response of two differentially drought tolerant varieties of maize to drought stress. Paki-stan J Biologic Sci, 4 (7), 779-784(2001).
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Special
Authors

Mostafa Mohammadi

Farshad Dargahi This is me

Publication Date May 13, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 36 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Mohammadi, M., & Dargahi, F. (2015). The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 1695-1700.
AMA Mohammadi M, Dargahi F. The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. May 2015;36(3):1695-1700.
Chicago Mohammadi, Mostafa, and Farshad Dargahi. “The Wheat Response to Drought and Salinity Stresses”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36, no. 3 (May 2015): 1695-1700.
EndNote Mohammadi M, Dargahi F (May 1, 2015) The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36 3 1695–1700.
IEEE M. Mohammadi and F. Dargahi, “The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1695–1700, 2015.
ISNAD Mohammadi, Mostafa - Dargahi, Farshad. “The Wheat Response to Drought and Salinity Stresses”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36/3 (May 2015), 1695-1700.
JAMA Mohammadi M, Dargahi F. The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36:1695–1700.
MLA Mohammadi, Mostafa and Farshad Dargahi. “The Wheat Response to Drought and Salinity Stresses”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, 2015, pp. 1695-00.
Vancouver Mohammadi M, Dargahi F. The wheat response to drought and salinity stresses. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36(3):1695-700.