BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1739 - 1746, 13.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • Sharifi Rad GR, Fathian Z, Tirani M, Mahakهﻩ B.,(2007),”Study on Behavioral Intention Model (BIM) to the attitude of pregnant women toward normal delivery and cesarean section in province of Esfahan –Khomeiny shahr-1385”, J Ilam Univ Med Sci, 15(1), 19- 23. (Persian)
  • Cunningham FG. (2001),” Cesarean section and postpartum hysterectomy. In:cunningham FG; Norman FG.;larry CG, Williams”, Text book of Obstetrics: From Appleton & lange Asimond Schusler company, pp 537-64.
  • Decherncy, P. M.,(1999),” Current Obstetric and Gynecologic Diagnosis and Treatment”, lange Medical Book,pp703- 709.
  • Fabri RH. and Murta. E F.(2002),”Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates “,International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 76(1),pp 87-88.
  • Cunningham F, M. P. and Leveno K,( 1993),” Cesarean section and cesarean hysterectomy. Williams’ Obstetrics”, 19th ed texa Prentice Hail International, INC,pp 591-594.
  • Gorrie TM. McKinney ES, and Murray SS.,(1998),” Foundations of maternal newborn nursing”3rd ed. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders Co,pp 466.
  • Garmarudy GH, Efteghar H, Batebi A.,(2002),” Factors underlying action Caesarean section in pregnant women,” Journal of Monitor, 2, pp45-49. (Persian)
  • Matias JP, Parpinelli MA, and Cecatti JG, (2007),.” Factors associated with mode of delivery among prim Para women with one previous cesarean section and undergoing a trial of labor”, Rev Assoc Med Bras,53(2),pp109-115.
  • Moreno MJ, Bartual E, Carmona M, Araico F, Miranda YA, Herruzo,(2002),”AJ. changes in the rate of tubal Ligation done after cesarean section”. Eur J obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,97,pp147-151
  • Ghosori M, Rahmanian V, Rahmanian K.,(2012).”Knowledge of pregnant women in the southwest Iran about complications of cesarean section, 2009 “,Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences,10(20),pp37-42. (Persian)
  • Alehagen S, Wijma K, and Wijma,(2001),” Fear during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand “, 80(4),pp 315-2
  • Saisto T, Halmesmaki E.(2003),” Fear ofchildbirth: a neglected dilemma”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,82(3),pp201-8
  • Marx J. Wiener N. and Davies H.,(2001),” A survey of the influence of patients' choice on the increase in the caesarean section rate”, J Obstet Gynaeco, 21(2),pp 124-127
  • Khani S., B. Shabankhani.,(2004),” Can rate of decrease in Mazandaran province? ”, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences,14(,2),pp45-49. (Persian)
  • Schneider, F. G., and Winn HN.,(2000),”Cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. In: Clinical maternal”, New York, Parthenon Press, pp15-18.
  • Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, and Schmahl FW.,(2005)“Association between method of delivery and puerperal infectious complications in the perinatal database of Baden-Wurttemberg 1998”Gynecol Obstett Inves, 60(4),pp 213-217
  • Cunningham FG. Prenatal Care.In Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hanth JC, Gilstrop LC,Wenstrom KD,(2005),”William obstetrics” New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Company,pp87-607
  • Hadi zadeh F, Bahrain N., M. Tavakoli J.,(2004),” Comparison of postpartum depression natural and emergency cesarean woman the first Pregnant”, Journal of improve.8(23),PP21-30. (Persian)
  • Gamble JA,and Creedy DK.,(2000),” Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature, Birth, 27(4),pp 256-63
  • Movahhed M, Enayat H, Ghaffarinasab E, Alborzi S, Mozafari R,(20012),“Related Factors to Choose Cesarean Rather than Normal Delivery among Shirazian Pregnant Women”, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, 2(13),pp78-83. (Persian)
  • Khosravi M, Armat M, Khadem N. (2008),”Prevalence of cesarean and factors related to cesarean ”,Journal of Faculty of Nursing Midwifery Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,16(58),pp11. (Persian)
  • Goulld JB,Davey BS,tafford R S., (1989),” Socio-economic differences in rates of cesarean section ”,The New England Journal of Medicine, 321(4),pp 223-290.
  • Ryding EL,( 1993),” Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean for personal reasons”, Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 72(4),pp 280-285.
  • Alehagen S, Wijma K, and Wijma B.,(2001),” Fear during labor”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,80(4),pp315-20.
  • Weaver JJ, Statham H, and Richards M.,(2007),”Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean section for nonclinical Indications”. Birth,34(1),pp32-41.
  • Shahavi F. Rostami F, Khosravi F, Rnayi F, Hashemi nasab L., (2014),”Women Lived Experience of Choice of Cesarean Delivery: A Phenomenology Stud “, The Iranian Obstetrics,Gynecology and Infertility,17,pp1-10. (Persian)
  • Seyed Nouri T, Jamshidi Avanaki F.,(2006),”Survey the relationship between knowledge and attitude of pregnant women requesting cesarean section referred to Rasht health centers and their choice reasons”, J Gilan Univ Med Sci,15(59):pp75-84. (Persian)
  • Vafaei R, Hosseini F, Ghobadi Dashdebi K, Momen bellah fard M J, Ghalandari M, Gharlipour Z, Tavassoli E,(2013), “Assessing the factors influencing delivery method selection in pregnant women referred to Public hospitals in Shirazr”,Journal of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,23,pp 13-18. (Persian)
  • Rice PL,and Nakzook C, (1998),”Cesarean or vaginal birth: perception sand experience of Thai women in Australian hospital”, Australian and New zeland Journal of Public Health,22(5),pp 604-680
  • Fardi A, Jafari Z.,(2003),”women toward vaginal delivery and cesarean”, Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Science, 59,pp66- 69. (Persian)
  • Mohammadbeigi A, Tabatabayi H, Mohammadsalehi N.,(2008),” Determination of effective factors on cesarean in shiraz”, Journal of Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery Iran University Medical Science, 21(56),pp37-45. (Persian)
  • Arjmandi B, Farzinmoqadam S.,(2007), “Study of knowledge pregnant women toward vaginal delivery and cesarean in Tehran”, Iran University of Medical Sciences Journal,14(55),pp1. (Persian)
  • Sercekus P, and Okumus H.,(2009),”Fears associated with childbirth among nuliparous women in Turkey”, Midwifery,25(2),pp155-62
  • Nichols F,and Humenick S.,(200),”Childbirth education. 2nd ed. Philadelphia”, Saunders Co,pp 67-68
  • Anderson ET.,(1996),” Health and disease prevention.”, Out look,165,pp 105-12.

Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1739 - 1746, 13.05.2015

Abstract

Abstract. Delivery is a multidimensional process considered as a critical experience in women’s lives. According to previously conducted studies, cesarean section rate, over the past two decades, has increased in both developed and developing countries. This is under the influence of many factors. One of the methods of reducing this rate is to identify the causes and factors affecting women’s choice. 271 pregnant women, admitted to Social Security Hospital in Zahdean, participated in this study. The results indicated that fear of labor pain, age, place of residence and previous delivery experience had significant correlation with behavioral intention (p<0.05) and fear of pain (91.1%) and fear of harming the fetus (89.3%) were the most important factors affecting women’s choice. Therefore, pregnant women referred to health centers should be informed about disadvantages of a cesarean section and preference for natural childbirth.

References

  • Sharifi Rad GR, Fathian Z, Tirani M, Mahakهﻩ B.,(2007),”Study on Behavioral Intention Model (BIM) to the attitude of pregnant women toward normal delivery and cesarean section in province of Esfahan –Khomeiny shahr-1385”, J Ilam Univ Med Sci, 15(1), 19- 23. (Persian)
  • Cunningham FG. (2001),” Cesarean section and postpartum hysterectomy. In:cunningham FG; Norman FG.;larry CG, Williams”, Text book of Obstetrics: From Appleton & lange Asimond Schusler company, pp 537-64.
  • Decherncy, P. M.,(1999),” Current Obstetric and Gynecologic Diagnosis and Treatment”, lange Medical Book,pp703- 709.
  • Fabri RH. and Murta. E F.(2002),”Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates “,International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 76(1),pp 87-88.
  • Cunningham F, M. P. and Leveno K,( 1993),” Cesarean section and cesarean hysterectomy. Williams’ Obstetrics”, 19th ed texa Prentice Hail International, INC,pp 591-594.
  • Gorrie TM. McKinney ES, and Murray SS.,(1998),” Foundations of maternal newborn nursing”3rd ed. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders Co,pp 466.
  • Garmarudy GH, Efteghar H, Batebi A.,(2002),” Factors underlying action Caesarean section in pregnant women,” Journal of Monitor, 2, pp45-49. (Persian)
  • Matias JP, Parpinelli MA, and Cecatti JG, (2007),.” Factors associated with mode of delivery among prim Para women with one previous cesarean section and undergoing a trial of labor”, Rev Assoc Med Bras,53(2),pp109-115.
  • Moreno MJ, Bartual E, Carmona M, Araico F, Miranda YA, Herruzo,(2002),”AJ. changes in the rate of tubal Ligation done after cesarean section”. Eur J obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,97,pp147-151
  • Ghosori M, Rahmanian V, Rahmanian K.,(2012).”Knowledge of pregnant women in the southwest Iran about complications of cesarean section, 2009 “,Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences,10(20),pp37-42. (Persian)
  • Alehagen S, Wijma K, and Wijma,(2001),” Fear during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand “, 80(4),pp 315-2
  • Saisto T, Halmesmaki E.(2003),” Fear ofchildbirth: a neglected dilemma”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,82(3),pp201-8
  • Marx J. Wiener N. and Davies H.,(2001),” A survey of the influence of patients' choice on the increase in the caesarean section rate”, J Obstet Gynaeco, 21(2),pp 124-127
  • Khani S., B. Shabankhani.,(2004),” Can rate of decrease in Mazandaran province? ”, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences,14(,2),pp45-49. (Persian)
  • Schneider, F. G., and Winn HN.,(2000),”Cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. In: Clinical maternal”, New York, Parthenon Press, pp15-18.
  • Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, and Schmahl FW.,(2005)“Association between method of delivery and puerperal infectious complications in the perinatal database of Baden-Wurttemberg 1998”Gynecol Obstett Inves, 60(4),pp 213-217
  • Cunningham FG. Prenatal Care.In Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hanth JC, Gilstrop LC,Wenstrom KD,(2005),”William obstetrics” New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Company,pp87-607
  • Hadi zadeh F, Bahrain N., M. Tavakoli J.,(2004),” Comparison of postpartum depression natural and emergency cesarean woman the first Pregnant”, Journal of improve.8(23),PP21-30. (Persian)
  • Gamble JA,and Creedy DK.,(2000),” Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature, Birth, 27(4),pp 256-63
  • Movahhed M, Enayat H, Ghaffarinasab E, Alborzi S, Mozafari R,(20012),“Related Factors to Choose Cesarean Rather than Normal Delivery among Shirazian Pregnant Women”, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, 2(13),pp78-83. (Persian)
  • Khosravi M, Armat M, Khadem N. (2008),”Prevalence of cesarean and factors related to cesarean ”,Journal of Faculty of Nursing Midwifery Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,16(58),pp11. (Persian)
  • Goulld JB,Davey BS,tafford R S., (1989),” Socio-economic differences in rates of cesarean section ”,The New England Journal of Medicine, 321(4),pp 223-290.
  • Ryding EL,( 1993),” Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean for personal reasons”, Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 72(4),pp 280-285.
  • Alehagen S, Wijma K, and Wijma B.,(2001),” Fear during labor”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,80(4),pp315-20.
  • Weaver JJ, Statham H, and Richards M.,(2007),”Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean section for nonclinical Indications”. Birth,34(1),pp32-41.
  • Shahavi F. Rostami F, Khosravi F, Rnayi F, Hashemi nasab L., (2014),”Women Lived Experience of Choice of Cesarean Delivery: A Phenomenology Stud “, The Iranian Obstetrics,Gynecology and Infertility,17,pp1-10. (Persian)
  • Seyed Nouri T, Jamshidi Avanaki F.,(2006),”Survey the relationship between knowledge and attitude of pregnant women requesting cesarean section referred to Rasht health centers and their choice reasons”, J Gilan Univ Med Sci,15(59):pp75-84. (Persian)
  • Vafaei R, Hosseini F, Ghobadi Dashdebi K, Momen bellah fard M J, Ghalandari M, Gharlipour Z, Tavassoli E,(2013), “Assessing the factors influencing delivery method selection in pregnant women referred to Public hospitals in Shirazr”,Journal of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,23,pp 13-18. (Persian)
  • Rice PL,and Nakzook C, (1998),”Cesarean or vaginal birth: perception sand experience of Thai women in Australian hospital”, Australian and New zeland Journal of Public Health,22(5),pp 604-680
  • Fardi A, Jafari Z.,(2003),”women toward vaginal delivery and cesarean”, Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Science, 59,pp66- 69. (Persian)
  • Mohammadbeigi A, Tabatabayi H, Mohammadsalehi N.,(2008),” Determination of effective factors on cesarean in shiraz”, Journal of Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery Iran University Medical Science, 21(56),pp37-45. (Persian)
  • Arjmandi B, Farzinmoqadam S.,(2007), “Study of knowledge pregnant women toward vaginal delivery and cesarean in Tehran”, Iran University of Medical Sciences Journal,14(55),pp1. (Persian)
  • Sercekus P, and Okumus H.,(2009),”Fears associated with childbirth among nuliparous women in Turkey”, Midwifery,25(2),pp155-62
  • Nichols F,and Humenick S.,(200),”Childbirth education. 2nd ed. Philadelphia”, Saunders Co,pp 67-68
  • Anderson ET.,(1996),” Health and disease prevention.”, Out look,165,pp 105-12.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Special
Authors

Hamid Momeni

Nasim Naeimi This is me

Publication Date May 13, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 36 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Momeni, H., & Naeimi, N. (2015). Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 1739-1746.
AMA Momeni H, Naeimi N. Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. May 2015;36(3):1739-1746.
Chicago Momeni, Hamid, and Nasim Naeimi. “Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36, no. 3 (May 2015): 1739-46.
EndNote Momeni H, Naeimi N (May 1, 2015) Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36 3 1739–1746.
IEEE H. Momeni and N. Naeimi, “Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1739–1746, 2015.
ISNAD Momeni, Hamid - Naeimi, Nasim. “Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36/3 (May 2015), 1739-1746.
JAMA Momeni H, Naeimi N. Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36:1739–1746.
MLA Momeni, Hamid and Nasim Naeimi. “Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 3, 2015, pp. 1739-46.
Vancouver Momeni H, Naeimi N. Study of Some Factors Contributing to Pregnant Women’s Tendency to Choose a Delivery Method. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36(3):1739-46.