The Effect of Personality Traits and Gender on EFL Learner’s choice of Refusal Strategies

Year 2015, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 1914 - 1929, 13.05.2015

Akram Miri , Gholam Reza Rohani Hamdollah Ravand

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the present study was to identify the strategies used by EFL learners while performing the speech act of refusal and to find its relationship with their Big Five personality traits including Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. It was also aimed to investigate the effect of gender on the choice of refusal strategies. Research participants consisted of 162 EFL learners who responded to NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Discourse Completion Task (DCT). The NEO-FFI was piloted to see whether it was valid and reliable for the subjects of the study. Based on the result of the pilot study, some modifications were made and 32 items were removed. The data thus gathered was then analyzed. Standard linear regression analyses indicated personality traits were significantly related to the choice of some refusal strategies by EFL learners. As results revealed personality traits accounted for 34 percent of variance in EFL learner’s choice of refusal strategies and 7 out of 27 used strategies indicating some relationship with personality traits. These strategies were No, Joke, Lack of enthusiasm, Let interlocutor off the hook, Gratitude, Statement of principle, and Swearing. Finally a t-test indicated significant difference between male and female performance on 7 refusal strategies including: Criticize the requester, Hedging, Postponement, Statement of regret, Statement of empathy, Statement of principle, and Unspecific reply.

Keywords

Refusal strategies, personality traits, speech act, NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), Discourse

References

• Abarghoui, M. A. (2012). A Comparative study of refusal strategies used by Iranians and Australian. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2439-2445.
• Al-Kahtani, S. A. W. (2005). Refusals Realizations in Three Different Cultures: A Speech Act Theoretically-based Cross-cultural Study. Language and translation, 18, 35-57.
• Allami, H., & Naeimi, A. (2011). A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Pragmatics, 43, 385-406.
• Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Rossier, J., & Garcia, L. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 591-604.
• Appling, D. S., Briscoe, E. J., Hayes, H., & Mappus, R. L. (2013). Towards Automated Personality Identification using Speech Acts. Paper presented at the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
• Arani, S. S. (2013). The Impact of Age and Sex on the Refusal Strategies Used by Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(4).
• Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundemental Consideration in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In: Scarcella, R., Anderson, E., Krashen, S. (Eds.), Developing Communication Competence in a Second Language (pp. 55-73). Newbury House, New York.
• Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blum-Kulka, S. (1982). Learning to say what you mean in a second language: a study of the speech act performance of Hebrew second language learners. Applied Linguistics, 1, 29-59.
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1-47.
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245-276.
• Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In K. F. (Ed.) (Ed.), Social Communication: Frontiers of Social Psychology (pp. 343-359). New York: Psychology Press.
• Cohen, A. D. (1996). Developing the ability to perform speech acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition(18), 253–267.
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7).
• Craver, C. B. The Impact of Gender on Bargaining Interactions. from http://www.negotiations.com/articles/gender-interaction/
• Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219-236.
• Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English (Vol. 15): Walter de Gruyter.
• Ghazanfari, M., Bonyadi, A., & Malekzadeh, S. (2013). Investigating cross-linguistic differences in refusal speech act among native Persian and English speakers. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(4), 49-63.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
• Hakimi, S., Hejazi, E., & Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Student's Academic Achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 836-845.
• Hazrati-Viari, A., Rad, A. T., & Torabi, S. S. (2012). The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 367-371.
• Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., & Peterson, J. B. . (2009). Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. Journal of Personality 77, 1085-1101.
• Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics: Longman.
• Homayouni, A. (2011). Personality traits and Emotional Intelligence as predictors of learning English and Math. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 839-843.
• Homayouni, A., Porahmad, R., Nikpour, G. A., & Mosavi, S. J. (2009). The study of relationship among personality dimensions and their role in learning English of distance education students. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on learning, Barcelona, Spain.
• Horn, J. L. (1967). On Subjectivity in Factor Analysis. Educatinal and Psychological Measurement, 27, 811-820.
• Hymes, D. (1967). On Communicative Competence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
• Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 215-247.
• Knapp, T. R. (1991). Coefficient alpha: Conceptualizations and anomalies. Research in Nursing & Health, 14, 457-480.
• Kuriscak, L. M. (2010). The effect of individual-level variables on speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor, & Usó-Juan, E. (Ed.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues (Vol. 26): John Benjamins Publishing.
• McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). "Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: data from 50 cultures.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547-561.
• Mckelvie, B. (2000). The effect of hyper femininity on communication patterns in dating couples. Dissertation Abstract International, 60, 63-75.
• Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender‐ as‐ culture hypothesis. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 121-152.
• Nelson, G. L., Batal, M. A., & Bakari, W. E. (2002). Directness vs. indirectness: Egyptian Arabic and Us English communication styles. international journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(1), 39-57.
• Nguyen, T. M. P. (2006). Cross cultural pragmatics: Refusals of requests by Australian native speakers of English and Vietnamese learners of English. The University of Queensland.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Oldham, J. M., & Morris, L.B. (1995). The New Personality Self-portrait: Why You Think, Work, Love, and Act the Way You Do: Bantam Books.
• Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Australia: Gold Coast.
• Parvaresh, H. R., Bidaki, T., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2014). Refusal Strategies of Iranian EFL Learners: the role of sex, age, education levels and politeness. International Journal of Education and Applied Sciences, 1(3), 121-128.
• Petrides, K. V., Vernon, P. A., Schermer, J. A., Ligthart, L., Boomsma, D. I., & Veselka, L. (2010). Relationships between trait emotional intelligence and the Big Five in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 906-910.
• Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An Item Selection Procedure to Maximise Scale Reliability and Validity. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.
• Reynolds, D. K. (2002). A handbook for constructive living: University of Hawaii Press.
• Rintell, E. (1997). Getting your speech act together: The pragmatic ability of second language Learners. Working Papers on Bilingualism Toronto, 17, 96-106.
• Rubin, J. (1981). How to tell when someone is saying ‘‘no’’ revisited: National Center for Bilingual Research.
• Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable Item-Cluster Subcomponents in the NEO Five Factor Inventory. Personality Assessment, 70(2), 263-276.
• Shams, R., & Afghari, A. (2011). Effects of Culture and Gender in Comprehension of Speech Acts of Indirect Request. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 4(4), 279- 287.
• Smith, C. J. (1998). Can Adults "Just Say No?": How Gender, Status and Social Goals Affect Refusals: University of South Florida.
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54.
• Travers, N. (2012). 10 Ways Men and Women Communicate Differently. Retrived from http://www.nancyscounselingcorner.com/10-ways-men-and-women-communicate- differently/
• Wikipedia. (2014, August 26). Extraversion and introversion.
• Wille, G. W. (1996). A stepwise procedure for the empirical assessment of latent variable models. Unpublished master’s thesis. Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth.
• Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L.(1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.