Referee Guidelines

1. Original research articles written in English are published in CUNAS; Scientific studies such as technical notes, letters to the editor, discussions, and case reports are not published.

2. The referees perform the article evaluation process by using the form named "Article Evaluation Form".

3. The names of the referees who evaluated the articles are not reported to the authors (blind peer review).

4. Ethics Committee Approval
With the decision of ULAKBİM dated February 25, 2020, “ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL must be obtained separately for all branches of science, clinical and experimental studies on humans and animals that require an ethics committee decision, this approval must be stated and documented in the article.” condition has been met. Publications that do not meet this requirement will not be accepted.

5. Statement of Ethics
Articles sent to the journal for evaluation must comply with all the rules that must be followed within the scope of the "Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive". None of the actions specified under the title of "Actions Contrary to Scientific Research and Publication Ethics" of the aforementioned directive should be taken.
Within the scope of "TR Index Journal Evaluation Criteria", in accordance with the ethical rules, the responsibilities regarding the required permission documents and submitting them to the journal belong to the responsible author.

Last Update Time: 2/8/24, 11:21:29 AM