Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics.

Hamdi Uluca; Leyla Tarhan Çelebi; Bekir Çakıcı; Ömer Ekşi; Ertugrul Osman Bursalıoğlu; İsmail Bayır; Ahmet Arif Kurt; İsmail Aslan

doi:10.38093/cupmap.1667482

Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the efficacy of two cultivation methods for curly crops: one involving the use of a probiotic-derived ATAGREEEN postbiotic-added nutrient solution, and the other relying on a nutrient solution without postbiotic. The analysis is supported by a comprehensive presentation of the experimental design, methodology, and results, as well as illustrative images. This study is discussed in detail under the following headings: basic principles of hydroponic agriculture, curly growing and its characteristics, the role of postbiotics in agriculture, the use of postbiotics in hydroponic agriculture, experimental design and methods, results and findings, analysis and interpretation of results, presentation of methods and results, discussion and recommendations. The experimental design is centred on the cultivation of curly plants in a hydroponic environment, with and without the addition of ATAGREEN postbiotic nutrient solutions. The methodology employed in the experiment, the cultivation conditions for the plants, the preparation of the nutrient solutions and the care of the plants were all determined in great detail. Furthermore, the experiment was designed to include a defined duration, measurement intervals, and data collection techniques. The results of the experiment demonstrated that the ATAGREEN postbiotic-supplemented nutrient solution exhibited notable advantages in curly growth. Plants treated with the ATAGREEN postbiotic solution exhibited accelerated growth, an increased number of leaves, and enhanced root systems. Additionally, plants treated with the ATAGREEN postbiotic solution demonstrated elevated resistance levels and greater resilience to detrimental organisms.

Keywords

References

References 1. Al Ajmi, A., Salih, A. A., Kadim, I., & Othman, Y. (2009). Yield and water use efficiency of barley fodder produced under hydroponic system in GCC countries using tertiary treated sewage effluents. Journal of Phytology, 1(5), 342-348.
2. AlShrouf, A. (2017). Hydroponics, aeroponic and aquaponic as compared with conventional farming. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 27(1), 247-255.
3. Aslan, İ., Çelebi, L. T., Çakıcı, B., & Bursalıoğlu, E. O. (2025). Oil-soluble novel skin microbiota friendly purifying oil cleanser formulation with postbiotics. Journal of Immunology and Clinical Microbiology, 9(4), 138-143.
4. Aslan, İ., Tarhan Celebi, L., Kayhan, H., Kizilay, E., Gulbahar, M. Y., Kurt, H., & Cakici, B. (2023). Probiotic formulations containing fixed and essential oils ameliorates SIBO-Induced gut dysbiosis in rats. Pharmaceuticals, 16(7), 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16071041
5. Aslan, İ., & Çelebi, L. T. (2023). Postbiotics cosmetic formulation: In vitro efficacy studies on a microbiome friendly antiperspirant. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 27, 2095-2105.
6. De Rijck, G., & Schrevens, E. (1999). Chemical feasibility region for nutrient solutions in hydroponic plant nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22(2), 259-268.
7. Despommier, D. (2013). Farming up the city: The rise of urban vertical farms. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(7), 388-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.009
8. Doğanay, D., Aydin, M., Aslan, N., Çelik, İ., Doğanay A, Çelik Y. (2025). Parents’ habits of using food supplements for their children: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic process use of nutritional supplements in children during COVID-19. Journal of Research in Pharmacy, 29(1), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.12991/jrespharm.1644375

9. Dkhar, M. J., & Bahadur, V. (2017). Effect of different nutrient formulations on growth, yield and quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cv. lollo rosso in a hydroponic system. The Allahabad Farmer, 73(1), 40-42.
10. Emani, D. S. K. R. (2018). A study on water use efficiency and pollution control by hydroponic technology. In International Conference on New Horizons in Green Chemistry & Technology (ICGCT).
11. 1Goddek, S., Joyce, A., & Kotzen, B. (2019). Aquaponics food production systems. Springer Open.
12. Gómez, C., Currey, C. J., Dickson, R. W., Kim, H. J., Hernández, R., Sabeh, N. C., ... Burnett, S. E. (2019). Controlled environment food production for urban agriculture. HortScience, 54(9), 1448-1458. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14073-19
13. Gökçe, H. B., & Aslan, İ. (2024). Novel liposome–gel formulations containing a next generation postbiotic: Characterization, rheological, stability, release kinetic, and in vitro antimicrobial activity studies. Gels, 10(11), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels10110746
14. Hamidon, M. H., Abd Aziz, S., Ahamed, T., & Mahadi, M. R. (2020). Design and development of smart vertical garden system for urban agriculture initiative in Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 82(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.14324
15. Hossain, M. I., Sadekuzzaman, M., & Ha, S. D. (2017). Probiotics as potential alternative biocontrol agents in the agriculture and food industries: A review. Food Research International, 100, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.066
16. Hu, J., Wei, Z., Friman, V. P., Gu, S. H., Wang, X. F., Eisenhauer, N., ... Jousset, A. (2016). Probiotic diversity enhances rhizosphere microbiome function and plant disease suppression. mBio, 7(6), e01790-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01790-16
17. Jafari, M., Asadi, E., & Fakheri Fard, A. (2024). Operational management of water quality to prevent physical, chemical, and microbial contaminations in hydroponic cultivation. Water Supply, 24(9), 3046-3060. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.081
18. John, C. J., Kumar, S., & Ge, M. (2020). Probiotic prospects of PGPR for green and sustainable agriculture. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 53(19-20), 899-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2020.1843412
19. Jones Jr, J. B. (2016). Hydroponics: A practical guide for the soilless grower (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
20. Kim, Y. C., & Anderson, A. J. (2018). Rhizosphere pseudomonads as probiotics improving plant health. Molecular Plant Pathology, 19(10), 2349-2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12693
21. Kitwetch, B., Rangseekaew, P., Chromkaew, Y., Pathom-Aree, W., & Srinuanpan, S. (2023). Employing a plant probiotic actinomycete for growth promotion of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. longifolia) cultivated in a hydroponic system under nutrient limitation. Plants, 12(22), 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12223793
22. Kowalczyk, K., Mirgos, M., Bączek, K., Niedzińska, M., & Gajewski, M. (2014). Effect of different growing media in hydroponic culture on the yield and biological quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata). Acta Horticulturae, 1142, 105-110. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.17
23. Kumar, S., Singh, R. P., & Singh, N. K. (2023). Modern techniques for soilless cultivation. Springer. 24. Kumar, S., Kumar, S., & Mohapatra, T. (2021). Interaction between macro- and micro-nutrients in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 665583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.665583
25. Li, C., Adhikari, R., Yao, Y., Miller, A. G., Kalbaugh, K., Li, D., & Nemali, K. (2020). Measuring plant growth characteristics using smartphone based image analysis technique in controlled environment agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 168, 105123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105123
26. Lopez-Galvez, F., Allende, A., Pedrero-Salcedo, F., Alarcon, J. J., & Gil, M. I. (2014). Safety assessment of greenhouse hydroponic tomatoes irrigated with reclaimed and surface water. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 191, 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.09.004
27. Maharana, L., & Koul, D. N. (2011). The emergence of Hydroponics. Yojana, 55, 39-40.
28. Mamatha, V., & Kavitha, J. C. (2023). Machine learning based crop growth management in greenhouse environment using hydroponics farming techniques. Measurement: Sensors, 25, 100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100665
29. Mateus-Rodriguez, J. R., de Haan, S., Andrade-Piedra, J. L., Maldonado, L., Hareau, G., Barker, I., ... Benítez, J. (2013). Technical and economic analysis of aeroponics and other systems for potato mini-tuber production in Latin America. American Journal of Potato Research, 90, 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9311-6
30. Michelon, N., Pistillo, A., Paucek, I., Pennisi, G., Bazzocchi, G., Gianquinto, G., ... Orsini, F. (2019). From microgarden technologies to vertical farms: Innovative growing solutions for multifunctional urban agriculture. Acta Horticulturae, 1298, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1298.9
31. Moraru, C., Logendra, L., Lee, T. C., & Janes, H. (2004). Characteristics of 10 processing tomato cultivars grown hydroponically for the NASA Advanced Life Support (ALS) Program. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 17(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2003.08.005
32. Pandey, R., Jain, V., & Singh, K. P. (2009). Hydroponics Agriculture: Its status, scope and limitations. Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
33. Patel, A. K., Michaud, P., Singhania, R. R., Soccol, C. R., & Pandey, A. (2010). Polysaccharides from probiotics: New developments as food additives. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 48(4), 451-463.
34. Pomoni, D. I., Koukou, M. K., Vrachopoulos, M. G., & Vasiliadis, L. (2023). A review of hydroponics and conventional agriculture based on energy and water consumption, environmental impact, and land use. Energies, 16(4), 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041690
35. Ragaveena, S., Shirly Edward, A., & Surendran, U. (2021). Smart controlled environment agriculture methods: A holistic review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 20(4), 887-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09591-z
36. Rakesh, J., & Jayakrishna, V. V. S. (2022). Vertical farming: Future of modern agriculture. Vigyan Varta, 3(6), 101-103.
37. Richa, A., Touil, S., Fizir, M., & Martinez, V. (2020). Recent advances and perspectives in the treatment of hydroponic wastewater: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 19(4), 945-966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09550-0
38. Sabry, F. (2021). Vertical farming: How shall we feed the three more billion people by 2050? (Vol. 4). One Billion Knowledgeable.
39. Song, D., Ibrahim, S., & Hayek, S. (2012). Probiotics in food and agricultural science. In E. C. Rigobelo (Ed.), Probiotics (pp. 1-20). IntechOpen.
40. Son, J. E., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, T. I. (2020). Hydroponic systems. In Plant factory (pp. 273–283). Academic Press.
41. Souza Vandenberghe, L. P., Garcia, L. M. B., Rodrigues, C., Camara, M. C., de Melo Pereira, G. V., de Oliveira, J., & Soccol, C. R. (2017). Potential applications of plant probiotic microorganisms in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Microbiology, 3(3), 629. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.629
42. Tarhan, L., Bursalıoğlu, E.O., Çakıcı, B., Genel, N., Kalbişen, H. T., & Aslan, İ. (2024). Can buttermilk (ayran) with its postbiotic content be used in the protection of colon health? Journal of Immunology and Clinical Microbiology, 9(4), 130-140.
43. Thomas, B. O., Lechner, S. L., Ross, H. C., Joris, B. R., Glick, B. R., & Stegelmeier, A. A. (2024). Friends and foes: Bacteria of the hydroponic plant microbiome. Plants, 13(21), 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213069
44. Trejo-Téllez, L. I., & Gómez-Merino, F. C. (2012). Nutrient solutions for hydroponic systems. In T. Asao (Ed.), Hydroponics: A standard methodology for plant biological researches (pp. 1-22). IntechOpen.
45. Tripp, T. (2014). Hydroponics advantages and disadvantages: Pros and cons of having a hydroponic garden. Speedy Publishing LLC.
46. Vanipriya, C. H., Malladi, S., & Gupta, G. (2021). Artificial intelligence enabled plant emotion expresser in the development hydroponics system. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 5034-5040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.640
47. Woo, S. L., & Pepe, O. (2018). Microbial consortia: Promising probiotics as plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01801
48. Zhong, J., Zhang, F., Peng, Y., Ji, Z., Li, H., Li, S., ... Zhang, J. (2017). Mixed culture of probiotics on a solid-state medium: An efficient method to produce an affordable probiotic feed additive. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 22, 758-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-017-0210-2

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Plant Biochemistry, Field Crops and Pasture Production (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hamdi Uluca
0009-0000-6669-3194
Türkiye

Leyla Tarhan Çelebi
0009-0008-6861-1103
Türkiye

Bekir Çakıcı
0009-0007-8040-7001
Türkiye

Ömer Ekşi
0009-0008-2173-4755
Türkiye

Ertugrul Osman Bursalıoğlu
0000-0002-2882-7435
Türkiye

İsmail Bayır
0000-0002-7273-3874
Türkiye

Ahmet Arif Kurt
0000-0002-3490-0192
Türkiye

İsmail Aslan ^*
0000-0001-7075-7103
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 30, 2025

Publication Date

July 1, 2025

Submission Date

March 28, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 29, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.38093/cupmap.1667482

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25AX22HX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Uluca, H., Tarhan Çelebi, L., Çakıcı, B., Ekşi, Ö., Bursalıoğlu, E. O., Bayır, İ., Kurt, A. A., & Aslan, İ. (2025). Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics. Current Perspectives on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 8(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.38093/cupmap.1667482

AMA

1.Uluca H, Tarhan Çelebi L, Çakıcı B, et al. Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics. CUPMAP. 2025;8(1):13-23. doi:10.38093/cupmap.1667482

Chicago

Uluca, Hamdi, Leyla Tarhan Çelebi, Bekir Çakıcı, et al. 2025. “Differences Between the Feeding of Hydroponically Grown Curly Vegetables With Postbiotic Free Nutrient Solution and ATAGREEN Postbiotic Supplemented Nutrient Solution With Probiotics”. Current Perspectives on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 8 (1): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.38093/cupmap.1667482.

EndNote

Uluca H, Tarhan Çelebi L, Çakıcı B, Ekşi Ö, Bursalıoğlu EO, Bayır İ, Kurt AA, Aslan İ (July 1, 2025) Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics. Current Perspectives on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 8 1 13–23.

IEEE

[1]H. Uluca et al., “Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics”., CUPMAP, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–23, July 2025, doi: 10.38093/cupmap.1667482.

ISNAD

Uluca, Hamdi - Tarhan Çelebi, Leyla - Çakıcı, Bekir - Ekşi, Ömer - Bursalıoğlu, Ertugrul Osman - Bayır, İsmail - Kurt, Ahmet Arif - Aslan, İsmail. “Differences Between the Feeding of Hydroponically Grown Curly Vegetables With Postbiotic Free Nutrient Solution and ATAGREEN Postbiotic Supplemented Nutrient Solution With Probiotics”. Current Perspectives on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 8/1 (July 1, 2025): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.38093/cupmap.1667482.

JAMA

1.Uluca H, Tarhan Çelebi L, Çakıcı B, Ekşi Ö, Bursalıoğlu EO, Bayır İ, Kurt AA, Aslan İ. Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics. CUPMAP. 2025;8:13–23.

MLA

Uluca, Hamdi, et al. “Differences Between the Feeding of Hydroponically Grown Curly Vegetables With Postbiotic Free Nutrient Solution and ATAGREEN Postbiotic Supplemented Nutrient Solution With Probiotics”. Current Perspectives on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, vol. 8, no. 1, July 2025, pp. 13-23, doi:10.38093/cupmap.1667482.

Vancouver

1.Hamdi Uluca, Leyla Tarhan Çelebi, Bekir Çakıcı, Ömer Ekşi, Ertugrul Osman Bursalıoğlu, İsmail Bayır, Ahmet Arif Kurt, İsmail Aslan. Differences between the feeding of hydroponically grown curly vegetables with postbiotic free nutrient solution and ATAGREEN postbiotic supplemented nutrient solution with probiotics. CUPMAP. 2025 Jul. 1;8(1):13-2. doi:10.38093/cupmap.1667482