Temel İhtiyaç Doyumu ve Kendini Bağışlama: Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğünün Aracı Rolü

Abstract

Kendini bağışlama kavramının son zamanlarda görgül araştırmalarda çok dikkat çekmesiyle birlikte, kavramın öncüllerine dair açıklamaların sınırlı kaldığı görülmektedir. Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, kendini bağışlama sürecinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamaktır. Bu çalışmada, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ile kendini bağışlama arasındaki ilişkide duygu düzenleme güçlüğünün aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Bu modelin, Kendini Belirleme Kuramı aracılığıyla kendini bağışlamayı anlamak için yeni bir bakış açısı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Çalışmanın örneklemi, yaşları 19-28 arasında değişen 451 üniversite öğrencisinden (365 kadın ve 86 erkek) oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılardan kendini bağışlama eğilimlerine, temel ihtiyaç doyumuna ve duygu düzenleme güçlüğüne yönelik ölçümler alınmıştır. Sonuçlar, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin temel ihtiyaç doyumu ile kendini bağışlama arasındaki ilişkiye kısmen aracılık ettiğini göstermektedir. Beklendiği şekilde, temel psikolojik ihtiyaç düzeyindeki artış duygu düzenleme güçlüğünün azalmasını ve bu yolla kendini bağışlama eğiliminin artmasını açıklamaktadır.

Keywords

• Kendini Bağışlama
• Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar
• Kendini Belirleme Kuramı
• Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü

Basic Need Satisfaction and Self-Forgiveness: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties

Abstract

Though the concept of self-forgiveness has received much attention within the empirical literature lately, the explanations of the antecedents of the construct still remain limited. The purpose of the current study is to broaden the limits of self-forgiveness and to provide a better understanding regarding of the process. In this study, the relationship between basic psychological needs and self-forgiveness through the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties was examined. The model provides a novel perspective for understanding self-forgiveness through the Self-Determination Theory. The sample consists of 451 university students (365 females and 86 males) between the ages 19 to 28 who completed questionnaires assessing tendencies of self-forgiveness, basic need satisfaction, and emotion regulation difficulties. Results indicate that emotion regulation difficulties partially mediate the relationship between basic need satisfaction and self-forgiveness. Consistent with our model, results reveal that as the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs increases, emotion regulation difficulties diminish, which results in an increase in self-forgiveness.

Keywords

• Self-Forgiveness
• Basic Need Satisfaction
• Self-Determination Theory
• Emotion Regulation Difficulties

References

1. Algan, F.M. (2021). Ortaklaşa yönetişim-uluslarötesi kuruluşların politika yönlendirmesi, Mülkiye Dergisi, 45(3), 793-832.
2. Algan, F.M. (2022). Green standardization in the light of responsible governance, EURAS 2022 Conference Book (pp. 9-24). Glasgow.
3. Boar, A., Bastida, R. & Marimon, F. (2020). A systematic literature review. Relationships between the sharing economy, sustainability and sustainable development goals, Sustainability, 12, 6744.
4. British Standards Institution. (2022). Encouraging trust within the developing sharing economy. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/media-centre/press-releases/2019/april/ encouraging-trust-within-the-developing-sharing-economy/
5. Castka, P. (2020). The role of standards in the development and delivery of sustainable products: A research framework. Sustainability, 12(24), 10461, 11-18.
6. European Commission. (2022). An EU strategy on standardisation setting global standards in support of a resilient, green and digital EU single market. European Commission. Communication From the Commission to The European Parliament, The Council. Brussels.
7. Filho, W. L. (2018). Handbook of sustainability science and research. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
8. Frenken, K. (2017a). Editoral: Sustainability perspectives on the sharing economy, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 1-2.

9. Frenken, K. (2017b). Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy, The Royal Society, 375(2095), 1-15.
10. International Organization for Standardization 42500. (2021). Sharing economy-General principles, ISO, Geneva.
11. International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO search. https://www.iso.org/home.html
12. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Greenhouse gases standard. https://www.iso.org/news/2015/07/Ref1988.html
13. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Green buildings. https://www.iso.org/news/2013/01/Ref1692.html
14. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Clean green fish. https://www.iso.org/news/ref2611.html
15. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Sharing economy gets boost with new ISO international committee. https://www.iso.org/news/ref2404.html
16. İzmir Kalkınma Ajansı. (2022). Paylaşım ekonomisi (Dayanışma ekonomisi, işbirlikçi ekonomi). https://kalkinmasozlugu.izka.org.tr/?p=554
17. Marcus A. A., & Fremeth A. R. (2009). Green management matters regardless, Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26.
18. Rhodes R. A. W., & Wanna J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406-421.
19. Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(8), 5-16.
20. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals, https://sdgs.un.org/goals
21. United Nations Development Programme. (2022a). Environmental Justice-Securing our right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. https://www.undp.org/publications/environmental-justice-securing-our-right-clean-healthy-and-sustainable-environment
22. United Nations Development Programme. (2022b). Promoting environmental justice-Securing our right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment through UNDP programming. https://www.undp.org/publications/environmental-justice-securing-our-right-clean-healthy-and-sustainable-environment
23. World Wildlife Fund. (2022). Climate change. https://www.wwf.org.tr/ne_yapiyoruz/iklim_degisikligi
24. Yakın, V. (2018). Paylaşım ekonomisi: Tanımı ve sınıflandırmaları, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348705454