Tüketicilerin Elektrikli Araç Satın Alma Niyetlerinin Belirleyicilerini Tahmin Etmek: Türkiye’den Ampirik Kanıtlar

Abstract

Günümüzde hava kirliliği, doğal kaynakların tükenmesi (petrol fiyatlarının artmasıyla sonuçlanan) ve iklim değişikliği gibi çevresel sorunlar, tüketiciler arasında elektrikli araçların tercih edilmesine yol açmıştır. Elektrikli araçlar, fosil yakıtların kullanıldığı karayolu taşımacılığından kaynaklanan sera gazı emisyonlarını azaltan etkili bir teknoloji olarak kabul edilmektedir. Türkiye'de son dönemde birçok küresel marka otomobil pazarına girmiş olsa da, elektrikli araçların gelişmekte olan Türk otomobil pazarındaki payı sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bu nedenle, tüketicilerin elektrikli araç satın alma niyetlerini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çevresel kaygı, çevresel algı, sosyal etki, performans ve kullanım engellerinin Türk tüketicilerin elektrikli araçlara yönelik satın alma niyetleri üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırma modelini ve literatüre dayalı hipotezleri test etmek için 340 katılımcı ile çevrimiçi bir anket gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler kartopu örnekleme yöntemi ile toplandıktan sonra SPSS ve SmartPLS paket programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, tüketicilerin çevresel kaygıları ile çevresel algılarının satın alma niyeti üzerinde önemli etkisi olduğunu doğrulamaktadır. Öte yandan elektrikli araç satın alma niyeti üzerinde sosyal etki ve performans anlamlı ve pozitif etkiye sahipken, kullanım engellerinin önemli bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Elektrikli Araçlar
• Satın Alma Niyeti
• Çevresel Algı
• Kullanım Engelleri
• Performans
• Sosyal Etki

Estimating the Determinants of Consumers' Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: Empirical Evidence from Türkiye

Abstract

In the present era, environmental concerns like air pollution, the decrease of natural resources (which has led to increased oil prices) and climate change have led to a shift in consumer preferences towards electric vehicles (EVs). The use of electric vehicles is regarded as an effective technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from road transportation using fossil fuels. Despite the recent influx of worldwide automotive brands into the Turkish market, the apportion of EV in the developing Turkish automobile market remains limited. It is crucial to identify the variables that influence consumers' intentions to purchase electric vehicles. The objective of this study is investigating the influence of environmental concern, environmental perception, social impact, performance and usage barriers on Turkish individuals' intentions to purchase EV. A survey was conducted online with 340 participants to test the research model and hypotheses derived from the literature. Once the data had been collected using the snowball sampling method, it was analyzed using the SPSS and SmartPLS software packages. The findings of the research indicate that consumers' environmental concerns and environmental perceptions have a significant effect on their purchasing intentions. On the other hand, while social influence and performance had a significant positive impact on the intention to purchase an EV, usage barriers did not have a significant impact.

Keywords

• Electric Vehicles
• Purchase Intention
• Environmental Perception
• Usage Barriers
• Performance
• Social Influence

References

1. Abbasi, H. A., Johl, S. K., Shaari, Z. B. H., Moughal, W., Mazhar, M., Musarat, M. A., ... & Borovkov, A. (2021). Consumer motivation by using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology towards electric vehicles. Sustainability, 13(21), 12177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112177
2. Ackaah, W., Kanton, A. T., & Osei, K. K. (2022). Factors influencing consumers’ intentions to purchase electric vehicles in Ghana. Transportation Letters, 14(9), 1031-1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1990828
3. Adhikari, M., Ghimire, L. P., Kim, Y., Aryal, P., & Khadka, S. B. (2020). Identification and analysis of barriers against electric vehicle use. Sustainability, 12(12), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124850
4. Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Samad, S., Alghamdi, A., ... & Mohd, S. (2022). Drivers and barriers of electric vehicle usage in Malaysia: A DEMATEL approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105965
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
6. Cui, L., Wang, Y., Chen, W., Wen, W., & Han, M. S. (2021). Predicting determinants of consumers' purchase motivation for electric vehicles: An application of Maslow's hierarchy of needs model. Energy Policy, 151, 112167. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112167
7. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
8. Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 250-260. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001

9. Ding, N., Prasad, K., & Lie, T. T. (2017). The electric vehicle: a review. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 9(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2017.082816
10. Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Environmental Sociology, 3(6), 482-524.
11. Durdak, A. (2024). Otomotiv pazarı 1 milyon 232 bin 635 satışla 2023'te rekor kırdı. Anadolu Ajansı, Retrieved April 7, 2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/otomotiv-pazari-1-milyon-232-bin-635-satisla-2023te-rekor-kirdi-/3100584
12. Dutta, B., & Hwang, H. G. (2021). Consumers purchase intentions of green electric vehicles: The influence of consumers technological and environmental considerations. Sustainability, 13(21), 12025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112025
13. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy policy, 48, 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
14. Etikan, I., Alkassim, R., & Abubakar, S. (2015). Comparision of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1), 00055. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055
15. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, ıntention and behavior: an ıntroduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
17. Güven, S. (1999). Ailelerin satın alma sırasında çevre açısından dikkat ettikleri hususlar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23(112), 67-74.
18. Habich-Sobiegalla, S., Kostka, G., & Anzinger, N. (2018). Electric vehicle purchase intentions of Chinese, Russian and Brazilian citizens: An international comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 188-200. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.318
19. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Ttheory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
20. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
21. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017), A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
22. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ EBR-10-2013-0128
23. Hair, J.J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009).Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Pearson.
24. Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017. 05.033
25. Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.010
26. Haustein, S., Jensen, A. F., & Cherchi, E. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: Recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 149, 112096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112096
27. He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1060-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.260
28. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11747-014-0403-8
29. Hofmann, J., Guan, D., Chalvatzis, K., & Huo, H. (2016). Assessment of electrical vehicles as a successful driver for reducing CO2 emissions in China. Applied Energy, 184, 995-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.042
30. Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
31. International Energy Agency (2022). What are the main sources of CO2 emissions in Türkiye? Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.iea.org/countries/turkiye/emissions
32. Ivanova, G., & Moreira, A. C. (2023). Antecedents of electric vehicle purchase ıntention from the consumer’s perspective: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(4), 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042878
33. Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco‐innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052396
34. Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.trd.2013.07.006
35. Juliandi, A. (2018). Structural equation model partial least square (sem-pls) dengan smartpls. Modul Pelatihan, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1243777
36. Junquera, B., Moreno, B., & Álvarez, R. (2016). Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
37. Kang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy policy, 39(6), 3465-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.045
38. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.016
39. Kocagöz, E., & İğde, Ç. S. (2022). Elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini hangi faktörler etkiler? Bir tüketici araştırması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(21. Uluslararası İşletmecilik Kongresi" Özel Sayısı), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1133892
40. Krishnan, V. V., & Koshy, B. I. (2021). Evaluating the factors influencing purchase intention of electric vehicles in households owning conventional vehicles. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1122-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp. 2021.05.013
41. Krishnan, V. V., & Sreekumar, M. (2023). An integrated behavioral approach to analyze the adoption of electric vehicles in the context of a developing country. Transport policy, 142, 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.08.014
42. Lai, I. K., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Xu, W. (2015). Factors influencing the behavioural intention towards full electric vehicles: An empirical study in Macau. Sustainability, 7(9), 12564-12585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912564
43. Lashari, Z. A., Ko, J., & Jang, J. (2021). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: Influences of user attitude and perception. Sustainability, 13(12), 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126778
44. Lee, J., Baig, F., Talpur, M. A. H., & Shaikh, S. (2021). Public intentions to purchase electric vehicles in Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(10), 5523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105523
45. Lin, B., & Wu, W. (2018). Why people want to buy electric vehicle: An empirical study in first-tier cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.026
46. Lin, S., Wang, S., Marinova, D., Zhao, D., & Hong, J. (2017). Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: Empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.107
47. Miwa, T., Sato, H., & Morikawa, T. (2017). Range and battery depletion concerns with electric vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017(7491234), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7491234
48. Ng, M., Law, M., & Zhang, S. (2018). Predicting purchase intention of electric vehicles in Hong Kong. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(3), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.015
49. Ninh, N. G. (2021). Resistance to change and purchase intention of electric vehicles: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Asian Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.210108
50. Nosi, C., Pucci, T., Silvestri, C., & Aquilani, B. (2017). Does value co-creation really matter? An investigation of Italian millennials intention to buy electric cars. Sustainability, 9(12), 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122159
51. Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217-2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.024
52. Patyal, V. S., Kumar, R., & Kushwah, S. (2021). Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective. Energy, 237, 121554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121554
53. Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021). A review on electric vehicles: Technologies and challenges. Smart Cities, 4(1), 372-404. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010022
54. Shareeda, A., Al-Hashimi, M., & Hamdan, A. (2021). Smart cities and electric vehicles adoption in Bahrain. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(2-3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1911024
55. Tarei, P. K., Chand, P., & Gupta, H. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847
56. Tu, J. C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability, 11(14), 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
57. TÜİK (2023). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları Retrieved April 12, 2024, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2023
58. Vassileva, I., & Campillo, J. (2017). Adoption barriers for electric vehicles: Experiences from early adopters in Sweden. Energy, 120, 632-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.119
59. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
60. Veza, I., Asy'ari, M. Z., Idris, M., Epin, V., Fattah, I. R., & Spraggon, M. (2023). Electric vehicle (EV) and driving towards sustainability: Comparison between EV, HEV, PHEV, and ICE vehicles to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 from EV. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 82, 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.10.020
61. Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Guo, D. (2017). Policy implications of the purchasing intentions towards energy-efficient appliances among China’s urban residents: Do subsidies work?. Energy Policy, 102, 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enpol.2016.12.049
62. Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J. W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029
63. Xu, G., Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2020). Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: examining the determinants of consumers’ intentions to adopt electric vehicles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22535-22546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08835-9
64. Xu, Y., Zhang, W., Bao, H., Zhang, S., & Xiang, Y. (2019). A SEM–neural network approach to predict customers’ intention to purchase battery electric vehicles in china’s Zhejiang province. Sustainability, 11(11), 3164. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su11113164
65. Yang, Y., & Tan, Z. (2019). Investigating the influence of consumer behavior and governmental policy on the diffusion of electric vehicles in Beijing, China. Sustainability, 11(24), 6967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246967
66. Yaprak, Ü., Kizir, E., & Yaşin, B. (2024). Tüketicilerin elektrikli otomobilleri benimsemesinde rolü olan faktörler: Birleştirilmiş teknoloji kabul modeli çerçevesinde bir araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 117-136.
67. Zhang, W., Wang, S., Wan, L., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, D. (2022). Information perspective for understanding consumers’ perceptions of electric vehicles and adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103157
68. Zhang, X., Bai, X., & Shang, J. (2018). Is subsidized electric vehicles adoption sustainable: Consumers’ perceptions and motivation toward incentive policies, environmental benefits, and risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.252
69. Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., & Zou, B. (2011). Analyzing public awareness and acceptance of alternative fuel vehicles in China: The case of EV. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7015-7024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.055
70. Zhuge, C., & Shao, C. (2019). Investigating the factors influencing the uptake of electric vehicles in Beijing, China: Statistical and spatial perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018. 12.099