CYBERCONFLICTS: AN EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION ON CONFLICT ECOSYSTEM

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 44 - 56, 30.01.2018

Hüseyin Oruç

Abstract

In this study we aim to understand how does globalization changed / expanded the international conflict ecosystem by introducing a newcomer: Cyber-conflicts. For the purpose of such an understanding first of all in the introduction part we revisit and integrate a number of theories and concepts such as conflict, cyberspace, imperialism, globalization theories and transnationality concept in order to have a theoretical framework about cyber-conflicts. Then we focus on the differences and relations between the conventional / kinetic conflicts and cyberconflicts. Although this study is based on qualitative analysis of what is called cyber-conflicts, we also include some quantitative data in order to clarify the current changes in international conflict ecosystem. In the conclusion part we reach a new conceptualization about cyberconflicts as globalization of war and criticise the lack of peace mechanisms.

Keywords

Conflict Ecosystem , Cyber-conflicts , Kinetic Conflicts , Globalization of War

References

• Arı, T. (2013). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri: Çatışma,Hegemonya, İşbirliği (8. Baskı ed.). Bursa: MKM Yayıncılık.
• Bousquet, A. (2008, September). Chaoplexic Warfare or the Future of Military Organization. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 84(5), 915-929.
• Choucri, N. (2012). Cyberpolitics in International Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Delpech, T. (2012). Space and Cyberdeterrence. In T. Delpech, Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century (pp. 140-157). New York: RAND Corporation.
• Derian, J. D. (2000, October). Virtuous War / Virtual Theory. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 76(4), 771-788.
• Friedman, G., & Friedman, M. (2015). Savaşın Geleceği:21.Yüzyılda Güç, Teknoloji ve Amerikan Dünya Egemenliği (The Future of War). İstanbul: Pegasus Yayıncılık.
• Friedman, P. W. (2014). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar:What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
• Galtung, J. (1971). A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81- 117.
• Galtung, J. (1973). Theories of Conflict: Definitions, Dimensions, Negations, Formations. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
• Galtung, J. (2007). Introduction: peace by peaceful conflict transformation – the TRANSCEND approach. In C. Webel, & J. Galtung, Handbook ofPeace and Conflict Studies (pp. 14-32). New York: Routledge.
• Gamero-Garrido, A. (2014). Cyber Conflicts in International Relations:Frameworks and Case Studies. Boston: MIT and Harvard University.
• Gregory, D. (2011, September). The Everywhere War. The Geographical Journals , 177(3),238-250.
• Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2003). Küresel Dönüşümler:Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması (The Global Transformations Reader). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
• Hughes, R. (2010, March). A Treaty for Cyberspace. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 86(2), 523-541.
• Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Jackson, R. (2015). Towards critical peace research: lessons from critical terrorism studies. In I. Tellidis, & H. Toros, Researching Terrorism, Peace and Conflict Studies:Interaction,synthesis, and opposition (pp. 19-37). New York: Routledge.
• Kellner, D. (2002, November). Theorizing Globalization. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285-305.
• Kosenkov, A. (2016). Cyber Confllicts as a New Global Threat. Future Internet, 8(45), 1-9.
• Kriesberg, L. (2012). Mediation in Conflict Systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 149-162.
• Leonhardt, M. (2001). Conflict Analysis for Project Planning and Management: A Practical Guideline Draft. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH.
• Lewis, J. A. (2013). Conflict and Negotiation in Cyberspace. Washington: CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies).
• Libicki, M. C. (2012). Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace. New York: RAND Corporation.
• Paul, C., Porche, I. R., & Axelband, E. (2014). Confirming the Analogy: How Alike Are Prfe-U.S. Speciial Operations Command Forces and Contemporary Cyber Forces. In C. Paul,
• I. R. Porche, & E. Axelband, The Other Quiet Professionals (pp. 31-46). New York: RAND Corporation.
• Podins, K., J., S., & M., M. (2013). 5th Conference on Cyber Conflicts:Proceedings. Tallin: NATO CCDCOE.
• Schmitt, M. (2012). Classification of Cyberconflict. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17(2), 245-260.
• Swanström, N. L., & Weissmann, M. S. (2005). Conflict, Conflict Prevention and Conflict Management and beyond:a conceptual exploration. Uppsala: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
• The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. (2017, December 6). Ecosystem. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/science/ecosystem
• Tierney, N. (2006). Religion, the Globalization of War, and Restorative Justice. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 26, 79-87.
• Wallensteen, P. (2007). Understanding Conflict Resolution:War, Peace and the Global System. London: SAGE Publications.