Fertility in the Context of Women’s Health and Reproductive Rights
Abstract
Pregnancy and birth
cause various health problems for women and maternal deaths, as a result this;
it strongly influences women’s participation and involvement in social
life. Each year, 287 thousand women die
due to pregnancy, birth and after-birth complications and many more women continue
their lives with serious health problems and disabilities. Conversely, women’s fertility
levels be it high or low, is an important factor which affects the size and
quality of the population. The size, increase, decrease and the structure of
population has always been subject to various political or economical debates; according
to some opinions it has even been argued as a main source of social problems.
Consequently, various types of interventions to increase or decrease the
fertility rates of women occurred based on political, economical or cultural influence.
Turkey implemented pronatalistic policies in order to increase fertility rates in
the first decades of the Republican period; then, antinatalistic policies so as
to decrease fertility rates between the 60’s and 90’s. Currently, in the last
15 years, pronatalistic arguments are in effect once again. Reproductive rights
perspective, which can be defined as the rights of women and couples with
regard to the joint decisions of men and women to decide freely on their
fertility and related issues. It presents a framework which is sensitive to
different choices and lifestyles, disregarding the state policies both aiming
to increase or decrease the fertility rates. The role of state, in this
framework, is to create the supportive conditions and proper health services
for realisation of these various options.
Keywords
References
- • Akın, Ayşe (2007). “Emergence of the Family Planning Program in Turkey”. The Global Family Planning Revolution, Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. W. C.Robinson and J. A.Ross. Washington, D.C.: World Bank: 85-102.
- • Akın, Ayşe, Çiğdem Esin ve Lezban Çelik (2003). “Kadının Sağlık Hakkı ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nün Avrupa'da Kadın Sağlığının İyileştirilmesine Yönelik Stratejik Eylem Planı”. Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Sağlık ve Kadın. A. Akın. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi: 17-32.
- • Annas , George J. (1998). "Human Rights and Health — The Universal Declaration of Human Rights at 50". New England Journal of Medicine. C.339, S.24: 1778-1781.
- • Barrett, Deborah & David John Frank (1999). “Population Control for National Developement: From World Discourse to National Policies”. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. J. Boli and G. M. Thomas. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press: 198-221.
- • Birleşmiş Milletler (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. C. Way. New York: United Nations.
- • Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Sekreterliği (2001). Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration, Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations.
- • Bongaarts, J. & S.W. Sinding (2009). "A response to critics of family planning programs." Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health.C. 35, S.1: 39-44.
- • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı (1963). Kalkınma Planı (Birinci Beş Yıl) 1963 — 1967, Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
November 24, 2016
Submission Date
August 29, 2016
Acceptance Date
November 21, 2016
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 19 Number: 49
Cited By
Oosit Kriyoprezervasyonu: Türk Ebelik ve Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Bilgi ve Tutumu
Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal
https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.1143470