Bangladeş Basınında Keşmir Çatışması ile ilgili haber yayın süresi: Bir İçerik İncelenmesi

Abstract

Kashmir, a mostly Muslim region occupied by India, received global media coverage in August 2019. Following the abrogation of Article 370 and article 35A of the Indian constitution, Kashmir was put under severe military lockdown. Since Kashmir is an area of international conflict between India, Pakistan and China, South Asian newspapers focus more on the issue of Kashmir. In the same way, Bangladeshi newspapers prioritize Kashmir. As Bangladesh is a predominantly Muslim country and geographically close to Kashmir, Bangladeshis are interested in the current situation in the disputed territory of Kashmir. The aim of this article is to investigate the nature of media coverage of the conflict in Kashmir, Bangladesh. Specifically, the objective of the study is to identify the difference in coverage of the Kashmir question between secular and conservative newspapers in Bangladesh. The content analysis methodology was used to carry out this research. Four Bangladeshi national newspapers were selected for the study. Of the selected neswpapers, 60 reports were gathered over a week following the repeal of section 370 on August 5, 2019. The findings revealed that although a Muslim country, not all Bangladeshi newspapers are ready to take a position on the internationally recognized issue of Kashmir. It demonstrates how India is extending its control over the Bangladeshi media. The Daily Janakantha, known for its pro-Indian editorial policy, gave a very negligible response to the problem of Kashmir. While thepaper did not avoid this question, it provided context from the Indian perspective. However, the pro-Islamic newspaper Daily Inquilab, gave an enormous coverage of the Kashmir problem compared to the Daily Janakantha. The entire coverage of the Inquilab tried to create sympathy for the Kashmiri. Likewise, the English language newspapers like the Daily Star and the Daily Sun in Bangladesh also divided with ideological biases. Research has shown that although the Daily Star tried to portray the Kashmir issue from neutral position, but the editorial of Daily Start clearly indicates his inclination with India. The analysis of the newspapers reveals the polarization of Bangladeshi media. The paper argues that the public spare of Bangladesh massively share sympathy with Kashmir, the elite and pro regime newspapers continue to represent the Indian context.

Keywords

• Jammu and Kashmir
• Article 370
• Content analysis
• Bangladeshi Media
• Popular uprising

Coverage of The Kashmir Conflict in Bangladeshi Media: A Content Analysis (Bangladeş Basınında Keşmir Çatışması ile ilgili haber yayın süresi: Bir İçerik İncelenmesi)

Abstract

Kashmir, a mostly Muslim region occupied by India, received global media coverage in August 2019. Following the abrogation of Article 370 and article 35A of the Indian constitution, Kashmir was put under severe military lockdown. Since Kashmir is an area of international conflict between India, Pakistan and China, South Asian newspapers focus more on the issue of Kashmir. In the same way, Bangladeshi newspapers prioritize Kashmir. As Bangladesh is a predominantly Muslim country and geographically close to Kashmir, Bangladeshis are interested in the current situation in the disputed territory of Kashmir. The aim of this article is to investigate the nature of media coverage of the conflict in Kashmir, Bangladesh. Specifically, the objective of the study is to identify the difference in coverage of the Kashmir question between secular and conservative newspapers in Bangladesh. The content analysis methodology was used to carry out this research. Four Bangladeshi national newspapers were selected for the study. Of the selected neswpapers, 60 reports were gathered over a week following the repeal of section 370 on August 5, 2019. The findings revealed that although a Muslim country, not all Bangladeshi newspapers are ready to take a position on the internationally recognized issue of Kashmir. It demonstrates how India is extending its control over the Bangladeshi media. The Daily Janakantha, known for its pro-Indian editorial policy, gave a very negligible response to the problem of Kashmir. While the paper did not avoid this question, it provided context from the Indian perspective. However, the pro-Islamic newspaper Daily Inquilab, gave an enormous coverage of the Kashmir problem compared to the Daily Janakantha. The entire coverage of the Inquilab tried to create sympathy for the Kashmiri. Likewise, the English language newspapers like the Daily Star and the Daily Sun in Bangladesh also divided with ideological biases. Research has shown that although the Daily Star tried to portray the Kashmir issue from neutral position, but the editorial of Daily Start clearly indicates his inclination with India. The analysis of the newspapers reveals the polarization of Bangladeshi media. The paper argues that the public spare of Bangladesh massively share sympathy with Kashmir, the elite and pro regime newspapers continue to represent the Indian context.

Keywords

• Jammu and Kashmir
• Article 370
• Content analysis
• Bangladeshi Media
• Popular uprising

References

1. Akbar, M. A. (2012). Dhaka Nawab Estate. P. S. Miah içinde, Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
2. Ataöv, T. (1960). Keşmir Meselesinin Önemi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Vol. 15, p. banglanews24.com. (2020, November 19). India-Bangladesh ties to reach a new height: Vikram Doraiswami.
3. https://www.banglanews24.com/english/:
4. https://www.banglanews24.com/english/national/news/bd/86701.details adresinden alındı
5. Bar‐Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation:Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21(2), 351–365.
6. BBC. (2019, August 06). Article 370: What happened with Kashmir and why it matters: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49234708 adresinden alındı
7. BBC. (2019, August 6). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news: https://www.bbc.com/news/worldasia-india-49246434 adresinden alındı
8. Bhat, R. M. (2015). The impact of conflict exposure and social support on posttraumatic growth among the young adults in Kashmir. COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2(1).

9. Bose, S. (2009). Kashmir: Roots of conflict, paths to peace. Harvard University Press.
10. Cottle, S. ( 2006). Mediatized conflict: Developments in media and conflict studies. London : McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
11. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1), 51-62.
12. Druckman, D. C. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10(1), 103- 126. Editorial. (2020, Decemebr 19). Bangladesh and India’s relations must go to the next level. https://www.thedailystar.net/: https://www.thedailystar.net/editorial/news/bangladeshand-indias-relations-must-go-the-next-level-2013765 adresinden alındı
13. Eryüksel, A. (2017). HİNDİSTAN ALT KITASI’NDA PAKİSTAN İLE HİNDİSTAN ARASINDA KANAYAN BİR YARA: KEŞMİR. Doğu Araştırmaları , (17), 47-56.
14. Fai, D. G. (2020, September 12 ). Kashmir and the UN Security Council. https://www.aa.com.tr/en: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/analysis/kashmir-and-the-unsecurity-council/1971039 adresinden alındı
15. Galtung, J. &. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Habibullah, W. (2008). My Kashmir: Conflict and the Prospects for Enduring Peace. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace
17. Imran, S. (2013). Framing Kashmir: How the Indian elite Press frames the Kashmir issue in its editorials. International Journal of Communication and Social Research, 1(1), 51– 69.
18. Khan, Y. (2017). The great partition: The making of India and Pakistan. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
19. Khurshid, T. (2016). United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Status of the People of Jammu and Kashmir. Strategic Studies, 36(4), 100-122.
20. Krizay, L. M. (2011). Begging for change: A comparative analysis of how the media frames domestic and international poverty. Inquiries Journal, 3(09), 1-3.
21. Lynch, J. &. (2010). Reporting conflict: New directions in peace journalism. St Lucia.: University of Queensland Press .
22. Macnamara, J. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. sia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 1-34.
23. Mazumdar, A. &. (2020). Framing of the Kashmir Dispute Between India and Pakistan in US Press: An Analysis of US Foreign Policy Interest. Journal of Media & Communication Research, 12(1), 47–61.
24. McCombs, M. &. (2002). News influence on our pictures of the world. J. B. Zillmann içinde, LEA's communication series. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (s. 1– 18). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
25. Memon, M. H. (2020). HOW CHINESE MEDIA COVER THE INDO-PAK ANTAGONISM OVER KASHMIR ISSUE: CASE STUDY OF PEACE AND WAR JOURNALISM PRACTICE AND ITS NEXUS WITH FOREIGN POLICY. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management,11(12), 11A12Q, 1-14.
26. Riaz, S. S. (2018). KASHMIR ISSUE AND PAK-INDIAN PRESS: CONTENT ANALYSIS OF LEADING NEWSPAPERS. ISSRA Papers Volume-X, Issue-II, 1-16.
27. Rowlatt, J. (2016, February 18). Attempt to crush independent media’ in Bangladesh. BBC online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35594968 adresinden alındı
28. Saddiqa, A. &. (2019). A comparative study of the Kashmir conflict coverage in Pakistani and indian press. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(III)), 1–9.
29. sangstha, b. s. (2021, March 1). Doraiswami: Bangladesh media vibrant, free, vocal. https://www.dhakatribune.com/: https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/foreignaffairs/2021/03/01/doraiswami bangladesh-media-vibrant-free-vocal adresinden alındı
30. Saraisky, N. G. (2016). Analyzing Public Discourse: Using Media Content Analysis to Understand the Policy Process. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 18(1), 26– 41.
31. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
32. Shah, D. V. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370.
33. Sreedharan, C. (2009). Reporting Kashmir: an analysis of the conflict coverage in Indian and Pakistani newspapers. Dorset: Bournemouth University. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Promoting peace through the news media: Some initial lessons from the Oslo peace process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2(4), 52–70.
34. www.aljazeera. (2019, August 5). Kashmir special status explained: What are Articles 370 and 35A? https://www.aljazeera.com/: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/8/5/kashmir-special-status-explained-what-arearticles-370-and-35a adresinden alındı
35. Yaswi, A. &. (2008). Prevalance of PTSD symptoms and depression and level of coping among the victims of the Kashmir conflict. Journal of Loss and Trauma 13(5), 471- 480.
36. Zaheer, L. (2017). Editorial Coverage of Kashmir Conflict in Pakistani Media. Journal of Pakistan Vision, 18(1).