Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Procedural Techniques and Variables in Patients Undergoing Arterial Cannulation

Year 2025, , 7 - 12, 29.01.2025
https://doi.org/10.56016/dahudermj.1588898

Abstract

Background: This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two methods for arterial cannulation, palpation, and ultrasound guidance (USG), using a sample of 104 subjects for each method.
Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of these techniques. Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded, including hemoglobin levels, platelet count, International Normalized Ratio (INR), albumin, and total protein levels. The number of attempts and total procedure time were documented for each procedure. Additionally, the ultrasound-guided (USG) method and the duration of each recorded procedure were emphasized to provide a detailed comparison between the two techniques.
Results: USG required fewer attempts than palpation (1.63 ± 0.83 vs. 2.36 ± 1.18, p<0.001), resulting in a higher success rate on the first attempt. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the USG group (7.14 ± 2.42 vs. 11.83 ± 4.45 minutes, p<0.001). This demonstrates the enhanced efficiency of USG. Complication rates were also lower in the USG group (16.3% vs. 31.7%, p=0.009), confirming its safety advantage.
Although the two groups showed no significant differences in hemoglobin levels, platelet count, albumin, total protein levels, inotropic agent requirements, or history of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and congestive heart failure (CHF), INR levels were significantly higher in the USG group (1.23 ± 0.26 vs. 1.14 ± 0.25, p=0.004). Furthermore, patients with higher BMI benefited more from USG, which was particularly advantageous in challenging cases.
Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that USG is more efficient, safer, and quicker than palpation, particularly in patients with a higher BMI. These findings suggest that USG is preferable for arterial cannulation in clinical settings, offering reduced complications and enhanced success rates, especially in more challenging patient populations.

Ethical Statement

ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from Bursa Şehir Training and Research Hospital’s Ethical Committee (Approval Number: 2023-18/10). The research was carried out on patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Intensive Care Unit at Bursa Şehir Training and Research Hospital, which is affiliated with the University of Health Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives prior to their inclusion in the study. All patient data were handled with strict confidentiality and in compliance with data protection regulations.

References

  • Saugel, B., Kouz, K., Meidert, A. S., Schulte-Uentrop, L., & Romagnoli, S. (2020). How to measure blood pressure using an arterial catheter: A systematic 5-step approach. Critical Care, 24(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02881-1
  • Lee, D., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H. S., Lee, K. C., Lee, S. J., & Kwak, H. J. (2016). Ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery for arterial catheterization in healthy anesthetized patients. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 30(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9714-4
  • Shiver, S., Blaivas, M., & Lyon, M. (2006). A prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial arterial catheters. Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(12), 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.036
  • Gupta, P. K., Gupta, K., Dwivedi, A. N., & Jain, M. (2011). Potential role of ultrasound in anesthesia and intensive care. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches, 5(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84184
  • Bhattacharjee, S., Maitra, S., & Baidya, D. K. (2018). Comparison between ultrasound-guided technique and digital palpation technique for radial artery cannulation in adult patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 47, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.033
  • Quan, Z., Tian, M., Chi, P., Cao, Y., Li, X., & Peng, K. (2014). Modified short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound versus conventional long-axis in-plane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 119(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000246
  • Qazi, E., Wilting, J., & Patel, N. R. (2022). Arteries of the lower limb: Embryology, variations, and clinical significance. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 73(4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211046497
  • Manjunatha, H. N. H. (2021). Variations in the origin, course, and branching pattern of dorsalis pedis artery with clinical significance. Scientific Reports, 11, 1448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81301-4
  • Bicak, E. A., & Elmastas, D. (2023). Comparison of ultrasonography guidance versus direct palpation technique for central venous catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 29(2), 88–94.
  • Anand, R. K., Maitra, S., Ray, B. R., Baidya, D. K., Khanna, P., & Chowdhury, S. R. (2019). Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(3), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_653_18
  • Yeap, Y. L., Wolfe, J. W., Stewart, J., & Backfish, K. M. (2019). Prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided versus palpation techniques for arterial line placement by residents in a teaching institution. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00592.1
  • De Souza, T. H., Brandao, M. B., Nadal, J. A. H., & Nogueira, R. J. N. (2018). Ultrasound guidance for pediatric central venous catheterization: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 142(3), e20181719. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1719
  • Oulego-Erroz, I., Gonzalez-Cortes, R., Garcia-Soler, P., Balaguer-Gargallo, M., Frias-Perez, M., & Mayordomo-Colunga, J. (2018). Ultrasound-guided or landmark techniques for central venous catheter placement in critically ill children. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5007-3
  • Bruzoni, M., Slater, B. J., Wall, J., St. Peter, S. D., & Dutta, S. (2013). A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound- vs landmark-guided central venous access in the pediatric population. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 216(5), 939–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.032
  • Ueda, K., Bayman, E. O., Johnson, C., Odum, N. J., & Lee, J. J. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of radial artery cannulation guided by Doppler vs palpation vs ultrasound. Anaesthesia, 70(9), 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13191
  • Chanthawong, S., & Tribuddharat, S. (2022). A comparison of the success rate of radial artery cannulation between ultrasound-guided and conventional palpation techniques in elderly patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 25(4), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_106_22
  • Oulego-Erroz, I., Gonzalez-Cortes, R., Garcia-Soler, P., Balaguer-Gargallo, M., Frias-Perez, M., & Mayordomo-Colunga, J. (2018). Ultrasound-guided or landmark techniques for central venous catheter placement in critically ill children. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5007-3
  • Zhang, W., & Li, K. (2020). Efficacy of ultrasound-guided technique for radial artery catheterization in pediatric populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care, 24(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02910-z
  • Zhao, W., & Peng, H. (2021). Effects of ultrasound-guided techniques for radial arterial catheterization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 46, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.002
  • Sung JM., Jun YE., Jung YD.,Kim KN. Comparison of an Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique and a Long-Axis In-Plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Older Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Volume 37, Issue 12, December 2023, Pages 2475-2481.

Arteriyel Kanülasyon Uygulanan Hastalarda İşlem Teknikleri ve Değişkenlerin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2025, , 7 - 12, 29.01.2025
https://doi.org/10.56016/dahudermj.1588898

Abstract

Özet:
Amaç: Bu çalışma, her yöntem için 104 kişiden oluşan bir örneklem kullanılarak arteriyel kanülasyon, palpasyon ve ultrason rehberliğinde (USG) iki yöntemin kapsamlı bir karşılaştırmalı analizini sunmaktadır.
Yöntemler: Birincil amaç, bu tekniklerin güvenliğini ve verimliliğini değerlendirmekti. Hemoglobin seviyeleri, trombosit sayısı, Uluslararası Normalleştirilmiş Oran (INR), albümin ve toplam protein seviyeleri dahil olmak üzere klinik ve laboratuvar parametreleri kaydedildi. Her prosedür için deneme sayısı ve toplam prosedür süresi belgelendi. Ek olarak, iki teknik arasında ayrıntılı bir karşılaştırma sağlamak için ultrason rehberliğindeki (USG) yöntem ve kaydedilen her prosedürün süresi vurgulandı.
Sonuçlar: USG, palpasyondan daha az deneme gerektirdi (1,63 ± 0,83'e karşı 2,36 ± 1,18, p<0,001), bu da ilk denemede daha yüksek bir başarı oranıyla sonuçlandı. Toplam işlem süresi USG grubunda önemli ölçüde daha kısaydı (7,14 ± 2,42 - 11,83 ± 4,45 dakika, p<0,001). Bu, USG'nin artan verimliliğini göstermektedir. Komplikasyon oranları da USG grubunda daha düşüktü (%16,3 - %31,7, p=0,009), bu da güvenlik avantajını doğrulamaktadır.
İki grup arasında hemoglobin seviyeleri, trombosit sayısı, albümin, toplam protein seviyeleri, inotropik ajan gereksinimleri veya pulmoner arteriyel hipertansiyon (PAH) ve konjestif kalp yetmezliği (CHF) öyküsü açısından önemli bir fark görülmese de, INR seviyeleri USG grubunda önemli ölçüde daha yüksekti (1,23 ± 0,26 - 1,14 ± 0,25, p=0,004). Ayrıca, daha yüksek BMI'ye sahip hastalar USG'den daha fazla yararlandı ve bu özellikle zorlu vakalarda avantajlıydı.
Sonuç: Mevcut çalışma, USG'nin özellikle daha yüksek BMI'li hastalarda palpasyondan daha etkili, daha güvenli ve daha hızlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, USG'nin klinik ortamlarda arteriyel kanülasyon için tercih edilebilir olduğunu, özellikle daha zorlu hasta popülasyonlarında daha az komplikasyon ve artırılmış başarı oranları sunduğunu göstermektedir.

References

  • Saugel, B., Kouz, K., Meidert, A. S., Schulte-Uentrop, L., & Romagnoli, S. (2020). How to measure blood pressure using an arterial catheter: A systematic 5-step approach. Critical Care, 24(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02881-1
  • Lee, D., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H. S., Lee, K. C., Lee, S. J., & Kwak, H. J. (2016). Ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery for arterial catheterization in healthy anesthetized patients. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 30(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9714-4
  • Shiver, S., Blaivas, M., & Lyon, M. (2006). A prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial arterial catheters. Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(12), 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.036
  • Gupta, P. K., Gupta, K., Dwivedi, A. N., & Jain, M. (2011). Potential role of ultrasound in anesthesia and intensive care. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches, 5(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84184
  • Bhattacharjee, S., Maitra, S., & Baidya, D. K. (2018). Comparison between ultrasound-guided technique and digital palpation technique for radial artery cannulation in adult patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 47, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.033
  • Quan, Z., Tian, M., Chi, P., Cao, Y., Li, X., & Peng, K. (2014). Modified short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound versus conventional long-axis in-plane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 119(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000246
  • Qazi, E., Wilting, J., & Patel, N. R. (2022). Arteries of the lower limb: Embryology, variations, and clinical significance. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 73(4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211046497
  • Manjunatha, H. N. H. (2021). Variations in the origin, course, and branching pattern of dorsalis pedis artery with clinical significance. Scientific Reports, 11, 1448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81301-4
  • Bicak, E. A., & Elmastas, D. (2023). Comparison of ultrasonography guidance versus direct palpation technique for central venous catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 29(2), 88–94.
  • Anand, R. K., Maitra, S., Ray, B. R., Baidya, D. K., Khanna, P., & Chowdhury, S. R. (2019). Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(3), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_653_18
  • Yeap, Y. L., Wolfe, J. W., Stewart, J., & Backfish, K. M. (2019). Prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided versus palpation techniques for arterial line placement by residents in a teaching institution. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00592.1
  • De Souza, T. H., Brandao, M. B., Nadal, J. A. H., & Nogueira, R. J. N. (2018). Ultrasound guidance for pediatric central venous catheterization: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 142(3), e20181719. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1719
  • Oulego-Erroz, I., Gonzalez-Cortes, R., Garcia-Soler, P., Balaguer-Gargallo, M., Frias-Perez, M., & Mayordomo-Colunga, J. (2018). Ultrasound-guided or landmark techniques for central venous catheter placement in critically ill children. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5007-3
  • Bruzoni, M., Slater, B. J., Wall, J., St. Peter, S. D., & Dutta, S. (2013). A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound- vs landmark-guided central venous access in the pediatric population. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 216(5), 939–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.032
  • Ueda, K., Bayman, E. O., Johnson, C., Odum, N. J., & Lee, J. J. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of radial artery cannulation guided by Doppler vs palpation vs ultrasound. Anaesthesia, 70(9), 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13191
  • Chanthawong, S., & Tribuddharat, S. (2022). A comparison of the success rate of radial artery cannulation between ultrasound-guided and conventional palpation techniques in elderly patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 25(4), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_106_22
  • Oulego-Erroz, I., Gonzalez-Cortes, R., Garcia-Soler, P., Balaguer-Gargallo, M., Frias-Perez, M., & Mayordomo-Colunga, J. (2018). Ultrasound-guided or landmark techniques for central venous catheter placement in critically ill children. Intensive Care Medicine, 44(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5007-3
  • Zhang, W., & Li, K. (2020). Efficacy of ultrasound-guided technique for radial artery catheterization in pediatric populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care, 24(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02910-z
  • Zhao, W., & Peng, H. (2021). Effects of ultrasound-guided techniques for radial arterial catheterization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 46, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.002
  • Sung JM., Jun YE., Jung YD.,Kim KN. Comparison of an Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique and a Long-Axis In-Plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Older Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia Volume 37, Issue 12, December 2023, Pages 2475-2481.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects ​Internal Diseases
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Nazif Yalçın 0000-0002-0110-0498

Aysegul Ertınmaz Ozkan 0000-0002-3273-1305

Nizameddin Koca 0000-0003-1457-4366

Publication Date January 29, 2025
Submission Date November 20, 2024
Acceptance Date January 2, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025

Cite

EndNote Yalçın N, Ertınmaz Ozkan A, Koca N (January 1, 2025) Comparison of Procedural Techniques and Variables in Patients Undergoing Arterial Cannulation. DAHUDER Medical Journal 5 1 7–12.



DAHUDER Medical Journal, hosted by Turkish JournalPark ACADEMIC, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

by-nc-nd.png