Danisname

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

Authorship and Contribution
Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the study. All significant contributors should be listed as co-authors. If there are minor contributors, e.g. language editing, they should be acknowledged in the acknowledgements section. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission for publication. Authors are expected to carefully review the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and to provide the final author list at the time of original submission. Only in exceptional circumstances will the editor consider the addition, deletion, or reorganisation of authors after the manuscript has been submitted. All authors must agree to any such addition, deletion or reorganisation. Authors take joint responsibility for the work.

Author Change Requests
Addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the author list can only be made before the manuscript is accepted and only if approved by the Editor of the journal.
If such a change is requested, the Editor will request from the responsible author (a) the reason for the change in the author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail) from all authors that they agree to the addition. Only in exceptional cases will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or reorganisation of authors after the article has been accepted.

Article Writing
Authors of original research papers should address the topic in an original way and with an objective discussion. The paper should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly false statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality
The author should provide assurance that the article is original, has not been previously published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in another language.

Using Original Sources and Citation
Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work and, if they have used the work or words of others, that this is properly cited. Privately obtained information, such as in conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties, should not be used without the express written permission of the source.

Data Access and Preservation
Authors may be asked to provide research data supporting their articles for editorial review and/or to comply with the journal's open data requirements. Authors should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if possible, and to retain such data for a reasonable period after publication. The journal recommends uploading research data to TUBITAK's Aperta Portal.

Multiple and Simultaneous Broadcasting
An author should not publish an article containing the same research in more than one journal. It is unethical to submit the same article to more than one journal at the same time. An author should not submit a previously published article for consideration in another journal, except in the form of an abstract.

Publication of Studies Based on Questionnaires and Interviews
For research in all disciplines that require ethics committee approval (ethics committee approval must be obtained, this approval must be stated and documented in the article. In researches requiring ethics committee approval, information about the approval (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section, as well as on one of the first/last pages of the article; in case reports, information on the signature of the informed consent form should be included in the article.

Conflict of Interest
Any financial or other interest that may cause the person to be conflicted in his/her work, significantly impair his/her objectivity, or provide an unfair advantage in favour of any person or organisation. All sources of financial support received during the conduct of the research and preparation of the manuscript and the role of sponsors in the study should be disclosed. If there is no source of funding, this should also be indicated. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include consultancies, salaries, grants. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

Error Reporting
When an author notices a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her published work, he/she should notify the journal immediately. It is also the author's obligation to co-operate in withdrawing or correcting the manuscript if deemed necessary by the editor. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains errors, it is the author's obligation to co-operate with the editor, including informing the editor.

Image Integrity
It is unacceptable to enhance, darken, move, remove or add a specific feature in an image. Authors must adhere to the policy for graphic images implemented by the journal.

Article Preparation

Language: Turkish, English      
The language of the journal is Turkish and English.

Article Types: Research Article - Book Review     
The journal publishes Research Articles and Book Reviews. There is no word limit for research papers. However, we advise authors to be as concise as possible for dissemination of the work.

Article Format: MS Word Template
Image Format: JPEG Minimum 300 dpi
Citation Style: Chicago Manual of Style or APA Citation System

Articles submitted for publication should be between 4000-8000 words.
The abstract of the article should be 150-200 words when it is first sent; when the article is accepted to be suitable for publication as a result of the referee process, an English abstract of 500-750 words for Turkish articles and a Turkish abstract of 500-750 words for English articles should be prepared and sent.
In Turkish writing, TDK spelling guide and TDK current dictionary are taken as basis. However, technical terms of the scientific field that are not included in the TDK dictionary are written as generally accepted in the literature of the relevant discipline. It is not obligatory to follow transcription rules except when required by the study. Extensions in Arabic words are indicated with capped â, î, û.
Text: It should be written in Microsoft Office Word programme.
Font Character: Times New Roman.
Page dimensions, paragraph, font size, line spacing: Studies should be written in Microsoft Word programme with at least 2.5 cm margins, the entire text should be written in Times News Roman font, 1 cm. paragraph indentation, 10 pt. and 1.2 line spacing; footnotes should be written in 9 pt. and single line spacing.
Tables and Figures: Tabular texts should be written in TNR font, 8-point font size and aligned on both sides.
Heading Format: It should be in Decimal System.
Author Changes: Only processed before the manuscript is accepted. Authors should carefully review the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the final author list at the time of original submission.

Source Citation Style
Manuscripts should be prepared according to the Chicago Manual of Style or APA Citation System, depending on the discipline preference.

The Chicago Manual of Style
https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html 

Application Examples

ARTICLE

a) Printed Article
Muhammet Fatih Kılıç, "From Ibn Sīnā to Abharī, the Emergence of the Distinction between the Complete and the Incomplete Cause", Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Science 4, no. 1 (2017): 69.
Kılıç, "Ibn Sīnā'dan Ebhari'ye Tam Illet-Nâkıs Illet Distinction's Emergence," 71.
Bibliography: Kılıç, Muhammet Fatih. "From Ibn Sīnā to al-Abharī, the Emergence of the Distinction between the Complete and the Inessential". Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Science 4, no. 1 (2017): 69-90.

b) Online Article
Ilyas Canikli, "The Limits of the Prophet's Knowledge According to the Qur'an", Journal of Turkish Theological Studies 4, no. 1 (2020): 9, accessed: 21 June 2020, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tiad/issue/54509/739448. 
Canikli, "The Limits of the Prophet's Knowledge According to the Qur'an", 25.
Bibliography: Canikli, Ilyas. "The Limits of the Prophet's Knowledge According to the Qur'an". Turkish Journal of Theological Studies 4, no. 1 (2020): 6-32. Accessed: 21 June 2020, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tiad/issue/54509/739448. 

BOOK

a) Single Authored Book
M. Hayri Kırbaşoğlu, Alternative Hadith Methodology (Ankara: Otto Yayınları, 2019), 23.
Kırbaşoğlu, Alternative Hadith Methodology, 54.
Bibliography: Kırbaşoğlu, M. Hayri. Alternative Hadith Methodology. Ankara: Otto Publications, 2019.

b) Book with Two Authors
Ali Osman Kurt and Dursun Ali Aykıt, History of Religions (Ankara: Bilimsel Araştırma Yayınları, 2019), 32.
Kurt and Aykıt, History of Religions, 76.
Bibliography: Kurt, Ali Osman and Dursun Ali Aykıt. History of Religions. Ankara: Scientific Research Publications, 2019.

c) Book with Three or More Authors
Bekir Topaloğlu et al., Principles of Belief in Islam (Istanbul: Marmara University Faculty of Theology Foundation Publications, 1998), 17.
Topaloğlu et al, Principles of Belief in Islam, 65.
Bibliography: Topaloğlu, Bekir, Y. Şevki Yavuz and İlyas Çelebi. Principles of Belief in Islam. Istanbul: Marmara University Faculty of Theology Foundation Publications, 1998.

d) Translated Book
Robert Wisnovsky, Ibn Sīnā Metaphysics, trans. İbrahim Halil Üçer (Istanbul: Klasik Yayınları, 2010), 52.
Wisnovsky, Avicenna's Metaphysics, 173.
Bibliography: Wisnovsky, Robert. Avicenna's Metaphysics. trans. İbrahim Halil Üçer. Istanbul: Klasik Publications, 2010.

e) Book Chapter (Copyright)
Murat Demirkol, "Nasiruddin Tusi", Doğudan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, ed. Bayram Ali Çetinkaya (İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2017), 6: 811.
Demirkol, "Nasiruddin Tusi", 6: 822.
Bibliography: Demirkol, Murat. "Nasiruddin Tusi". In The Serüveni of Thought from East to West, ed. Bayram Ali Çetinkaya, 6: 811-844. Istanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2017.

f) Book Chapter (Translation):
Rudolph Ulrich, "The Emergence of Maturidism", trans. Ali Dere, in Imam Maturidi and Maturidism, ed. Sönmez Kutlu (Ankara: Kitabiyat Yayınları, 2003), 298.
Ulrich, "The Emergence of Maturidism", 299. Bibliography: Ulrich, Rudolph. "The Emergence of Maturidism". trans. Ali Dere, Imam Maturidi and
In Maturidism, ed. Sönmez Kutlu, 295-304. Ankara: Kitabiyat Publications, 2003.

g) Tahkik (Ed. Crit.):
Abū Ḥāmid Muhammad al-Ghazālī, al-Iktisād fi al-i'tikād, thk. Abdullah Khalilī (Beirut: Dāru al-kutub al-ilmiyya, 2004), 87.
al-Ghazālī, al-Iktisād fi al-i'tikād, 91.
al-Ghazālī, Abū Hamid Muhammad. al-Iktisād fi al-i'tikād. thk. Abdullah Khalīlī. Beirut: Dâru al-kutub al-ilmiyye, 2004.

ANSYCYCLOPEDY

a) Encyclopaedia-Matbu
Şükrü Özen, "Hilāf", Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi (Ankara: TDV Publications, 1998), 17: 527.
Özen, "Hilāf", 538.
Bibliography: Özen, Şükrü. "Hilāf". Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi. 17: 527-538. Ankara: TDV Publications, 1998.

b) Encyclopedia-Web
Şükrü Özen, "Hilāf", Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi (Access: 19 June 2020).
Özen, "Hilāf".
Bibliography: Özen, Şükrü. "Hilāf". Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Islam Encyclopedia. Accessed: 19 June 2020. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/hilaf 

TEZ

Ayşe Uzun, "Hijri First Four Centuries Tafsir-Dictionary Relationship" (PhD dissertation, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 2019), 42.
Uzun, "Tafsir-Dictionary Relationship in the First Four Centuries of Hijri", 74-78.
Bibliography: Ayşe Uzun. "Tafsir-Dictionary Relationship in the First Four Centuries of Hijri". PhD thesis, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 2019.

WRITTEN WORK

Hüseyin V âiz Kâşifî, Ahlâq-ı Muhsinî, Süleymaniye Ktp., Ayasofya, nr. 2829, 21a.
Kâşifî, Ahlâq-ı Muhsinî, 35b-36a.
Bibliography: Kâşifî, Hüseyin Vâiz. Ahlâq-i Muhsinî. Ayasofya, nr. 2829, Süleymaniye Library.

ARCHIVE DOCUMENT

Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, Irade Mesâil-i Muhimme, 2079.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, Irade Mesâil-i Muhimme, 2079.
Bibliography:
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, Irade Mesâil-i Mühimme, 2079.

WEBSITE

"Google Privacy Policy", last updated: March 11, 2009, http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html. 
"Google Privacy Policy".
Source: Google. "Google Privacy Policy". Last updated: 11 March 2009.
http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html. 

For APA 6th Edition examples, the following link can be used:
https://library.ihu.edu.tr/erisim-ve-yardim/apa_tr

Final Checklist

It is hoped that this list will be useful during the final check of the manuscript before it is uploaded to the journal system.
Make sure that the following items are present:
Author information added.
Email address
Full postal address
Telephone number
All necessary files have been uploaded.
Article text
Copyright Agreement
The article has been "spell-checked" and "grammar-checked".
All references mentioned in the bibliography are cited in the text and vice versa.

Submit Article

The account of the corresponding author of the study should be used in the submissions. All correspondence regarding the application is sent to the corresponding author by e-mail sent through the journal system.
When uploading the manuscript file, make sure that this file does not contain any elements that will decipher the identity of the author due to the double-blind review process.
Files You Need to Upload Separately:
Full Manuscript
Article Process Tracking

Publication Ethics Principles
Publication Ethics can be defined as a self-regulatory mechanism that insists on integrity on behalf of authors, reviewers and publishers to establish higher standards of editorial processing. Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high quality scientific publications, public confidence in scientific findings, and respect for people's opinions.

Peer-reviewed studies are studies that support and actualise the scientific method. At this point, it is of great importance that all parties involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, referees and editors) comply with ethical principles. Danisname journal adheres to national and international standards on research and publication ethics. It complies with the Press Law, the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works and the Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions. Danisname has adopted the International Ethical Publishing Principles published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). It also undertakes to comply with the decisions of the Turkish Editors' Workshop.

Correction, Withdrawal, Expression of Concern
Editors may consider publishing a correction if minor errors are detected in the published article that do not affect the findings, interpretations and conclusions. Editors should consider retracting the manuscript if there are major errors/violations that invalidate the findings and conclusions.
Editors should consider issuing a statement of concern if there is a possibility of research or publication misconduct by the authors; there is evidence that the findings are unreliable and that the authors' institutions have not investigated the incident; or the potential investigation appears unfair or inconclusive. COPE and ICJME guidelines regarding correction, retraction, or expression of concern are taken into account.

Authorship and Contribution
After the manuscript is submitted to the Journal for publication, none of the authors' names may be removed or a new name may be added without the written permission of all authors. In addition, the order of authors cannot be changed.

Contribution Rate Declaration
In the article, the contribution rate declaration of the researchers, the statement of support and acknowledgement, if any, and the conflict of interest declaration should be stated. The MS Word template of the manuscript, including the declaration table, can be downloaded here.

Publication of Studies Based on Surveys and Interviews
Danisname adopts the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) "Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers" to provide ethical assurance in scientific periodical publishing. In this context, the following points should be complied with in the studies submitted to the journal:

For research in all disciplines that require ethics committee approval (ethics committee approval must be obtained, this approval must be stated and documented in the article.
In researches requiring ethics committee approval, information about the permission (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section, as well as on one of the first/last pages of the article; in case reports, information on the signature of the informed consent form should be included in the article.

Special and Supplementary Issue Publication Procedure
A special issue can be published once a year upon the request of the Editorial Board. All articles published in abstract and supplementary issues are subject to a double blind peer review process.

Republishing
Republishing is the publication of the same article or substantially similar articles in more than one journal. The editor sends such an article back without reviewing it. Thereafter, the editor may impose an embargo for a certain period of time on the author who has attempted to republish, publicise this situation in the journal in which the author has previously published (perhaps by simultaneous announcement with the editor of the journal that published the previous article), or apply all of these measures together.

Simultaneous submission of the same work to more than one journal
Authors may not submit the same article to more than one journal at the same time. If the editor learns of possible simultaneous submission, he/she reserves the right to consult with the other editor(s) receiving the manuscript. In addition, the editor may return the manuscript without review or reject the manuscript without considering the reviews, or take this decision in discussion with the other editor(s) involved, and may decide not to accept submissions from authors for a certain period of time. It may also write to the authors' employers or take all of these measures together.

Suicide Prevention Control
Plagiarism is presenting the ideas, methods, data, applications, writings, figures or works of others as one's own work, in whole or in part, without citing their owners in accordance with scientific rules.
Danisname scans all submitted articles to prevent plagiarism. Studies submitted for review are checked for plagiarism using the software. The similarity rate is expected to be less than 20%. The main measure of similarity is the author's compliance with the rules of citation and citation. If the similarity rate is 1%, but citation and quotation are not done properly, plagiarism may still be in question. In this respect, citation and quotation rules should be known and carefully applied by the author.
Plagiarism, duplication, false authorship/confessed authorship, research/data fabrication, article slicing, sliced publication, copyright infringement and concealment of conflict of interest are considered unethical behaviours. All articles that do not comply with accepted ethical standards are removed from publication. This includes articles containing possible irregularities and non-conformities detected after publication.

Forgery
To produce data that is not based on research, to edit or change the work presented or published on the basis of unreal data, to report or publish them, to show a research that has not been done as if it has been done.
Falsifying research records and data obtained, showing methods, devices and materials that were not used in the research as if they were used, not evaluating data that do not comply with the research hypothesis, manipulating data and/or results to fit the relevant theory or assumptions, falsifying or shaping the research results in line with the interests of the persons and organisations supported.

Protection of Personal Data of Participants
The Advisory requires that all research involving personal or sensitive data or materials relating to human participants that are not legally publicly available be subject to formal ethical review.

Addressing Allegations of Research Misconduct
Danisname adheres to COPE's Ethical Toolkit for a Successful Editorial. Danisname editors will take measures to prevent the publication of manuscripts in which plagiarism, citation manipulation, data falsification, data fabrication, and other research misconduct has occurred. In no case will Danisname or its editors knowingly allow such misconduct to occur. In the event that Danisname editors become aware of any allegations of research misconduct related to an article published in their journal, they will follow COPE's guidelines regarding allegations.

Ethical Violation Notifications
Readers can send an e-mail to Danisname (e-ISSN: 2717-9974) if they notice a significant error or inaccuracy in an article published in Danisname (e-ISSN: 2717-9974) or if they have any complaints about the editorial content (plagiarism, duplicate articles, etc.). We welcome applications as it will provide an opportunity for us to improve, and we will respond quickly and constructively.

Research Ethics Principles
Danisname journal observes the highest standards in research ethics and adopts the international principles of research ethics defined below. It is the responsibility of the authors to ensure that manuscripts comply with ethical guidelines.
The principles of integrity, quality and transparency should be ensured in the design, review of the design and conduct of the research.
The research team and participants should be fully informed about the purpose of the research, its methods and possible uses; the requirements and risks, if any, of participation in the research.
Confidentiality of information provided by research participants and confidentiality of respondents must be ensured. The research should be designed to protect the autonomy and dignity of the participants.
Research participants should take part in the research voluntarily and should not be under any coercion.
Harm to the participants should be avoided. The research should be planned in a way that does not put the participants at risk.
Research independence must be clear and explicit; if there is a conflict of interest, it must be stated.
In experimental studies with human subjects, the written informed consent of the participants who decide to participate in the research must be obtained. The consent of the legal guardian of children and those under guardianship or those with a recognised mental illness must be obtained.
If the study will be carried out in any institution or organisation, approval must be obtained from this institution or organisation that the study will be conducted.
In studies with a human element, it should be stated in the "method" section that "informed consent" has been obtained from the participants and ethics committee approval has been obtained from the institution where the study is conducted.