Research Article

SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY

Volume: 39 Number: 3 July 25, 2025
EN

SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY

Abstract

AIM Vagal nerve stimulation surgery is one of the prominent neuromodulation methods due to its increasing spectrum of indications and number of cases worldwide. Surgical complications of this procedure may lead to temporary or permanent results and may require repeated surgeries. This study aimed to compile the surgical complications of patients who underwent vagus nerve stimulation surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who underwent vagus nerve stimulation surgery in a single center were grouped as initial implantation, pulse generator revision, complete revision, or system removal. Average surgery time was documented along with age and gender information. Data on surgery-related complications such as local infection, headache, cough, temporary or permanent hoarseness, vascular injury and hematoma were examined in all patients. RESULTS There were 44 patients subjected to the study. The most frequently performed procedure was primary implantation in 77.3% of the patients (n: 34). One or more complications developed in 29.54% (n:13). The most common surgical complication was headache in 7 patients (15.9%), and the only permenant complication was hoarseness in 1 patient (2.9%). DISCUSSION Vagus nerve stimulation surgery improves the patient’s quality of life. Life threatening and permanent complications are not common in vagus nerve stimulation surgery. Our surgical complication rates are similar with literature. CONCLUSION Vagus nerve stimulation surgery is a relatively safe procedure. Further researches will help to understand complications and rates better.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

None.

Ethical Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bakırçay University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (dated 07/03/2025 and decision number 2093).

References

  1. 1. Salama H, Salama A, Oscher L, Jallo GI, Shimony N. The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurol Sci. 2024 Sep;45(9):4243-4268. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07513-9. Epub 2024 Apr 20. PMID: 38642321.
  2. 2. Penry JK, Dean JC. Prevention of intractable partial seizures by intermittent vagal stimulation in humans: preliminary results. Epilepsia 1990;31(Suppl 2): S40-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05848.x.
  3. 3. Bottomley JM, LeReun C, Diamantopoulos A, Mitchell S, Gaynes BN. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in patients with treatment resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 12;98:152156. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152156. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31978785.
  4. 4. Cocores AN, Smirnoff L, Greco G, Herrera R, Monteith TS. Update on Neuromodulation for Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders: Recent Advances and New Indications. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Feb 15;29(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01314-7. PMID: 39954214; PMCID: PMC11829934.
  5. 5. González HFJ, Yengo-Kahn A, Englot DJ. Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;30(2):219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.12.005. PMID: 30898273; PMCID: PMC6432928.
  6. 6. Kahlow H, Olivecrona M. Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single center longitudinal study of 143 patients. Seizure. 2013 Dec;22(10):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 15. PMID: 23867218.
  7. 7. van Schooten J, Smeets J, van Kuijk SM, Klinkenberg S, Schijns OEMG, Nelissen J, Wagner LGL, Rouhl RPW, Majoie MHJM, Rijkers K. Surgical complications of vagus nerve stimulation surgery: A 14-years single-center experience. Brain Spine. 2023 Dec 14;4:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102733. PMID: 38510607; PMCID: PMC10951712.
  8. 8. Lotan, G., Vaiman, M., 2015. Treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve from Head-and-Neck surgical point of view. Laryngoscope 125 (6), 1352–1355.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 25, 2025

Submission Date

March 28, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 39 Number: 3

APA
Gürsoy, G., & Güvenç, G. (2025). SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine, 39(3), 201-205. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1667545
AMA
1.Gürsoy G, Güvenç G. SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025;39(3):201-205. doi:10.18614/dehm.1667545
Chicago
Gürsoy, Güven, and Gönül Güvenç. 2025. “SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39 (3): 201-5. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1667545.
EndNote
Gürsoy G, Güvenç G (July 1, 2025) SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39 3 201–205.
IEEE
[1]G. Gürsoy and G. Güvenç, “SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY”, Dev Exp Health Med, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 201–205, July 2025, doi: 10.18614/dehm.1667545.
ISNAD
Gürsoy, Güven - Güvenç, Gönül. “SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine 39/3 (July 1, 2025): 201-205. https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1667545.
JAMA
1.Gürsoy G, Güvenç G. SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025;39:201–205.
MLA
Gürsoy, Güven, and Gönül Güvenç. “SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY”. Developments and Experiments in Health and Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, July 2025, pp. 201-5, doi:10.18614/dehm.1667545.
Vancouver
1.Güven Gürsoy, Gönül Güvenç. SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY. Dev Exp Health Med. 2025 Jul. 1;39(3):201-5. doi:10.18614/dehm.1667545