SINGLE CENTER SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION SURGERY

Year 2025, Volume: 39 Issue: 3, 201 - 205, 25.07.2025

Güven Gürsoy , Gönül Güvenç

https://doi.org/10.18614/dehm.1667545

Abstract

AIM
Vagal nerve stimulation surgery is one of the prominent neuromodulation methods due to its increasing spectrum of indications and number of cases worldwide. Surgical complications of this procedure may lead to temporary or permanent results and may require repeated surgeries. This study aimed to compile the surgical complications of patients who underwent vagus nerve stimulation surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Adult patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who underwent vagus nerve stimulation surgery in a single center were grouped as initial implantation, pulse generator revision, complete revision, or system removal. Average surgery time was documented along with age and gender information. Data on surgery-related complications such as local infection, headache, cough, temporary or permanent hoarseness, vascular injury and hematoma were examined in all patients.
RESULTS
There were 44 patients subjected to the study. The most frequently performed procedure was primary implantation in 77.3% of the patients (n: 34). One or more complications developed in 29.54% (n:13). The most common surgical complication was headache in 7 patients (15.9%), and the only permenant complication was hoarseness in 1 patient (2.9%).
DISCUSSION
Vagus nerve stimulation surgery improves the patient’s quality of life. Life threatening and permanent complications are not common in vagus nerve stimulation surgery. Our surgical complication rates are similar with literature.
CONCLUSION
Vagus nerve stimulation surgery is a relatively safe procedure. Further researches will help to understand complications and rates better.

Keywords

Vagus nerve stimulation , Epilepsy , Surgical complications

Ethical Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bakırçay University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (dated 07/03/2025 and decision number 2093).

Supporting Institution

None.

References

• 1. Salama H, Salama A, Oscher L, Jallo GI, Shimony N. The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurol Sci. 2024 Sep;45(9):4243-4268. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07513-9. Epub 2024 Apr 20. PMID: 38642321.
• 2. Penry JK, Dean JC. Prevention of intractable partial seizures by intermittent vagal stimulation in humans: preliminary results. Epilepsia 1990;31(Suppl 2): S40-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05848.x.
• 3. Bottomley JM, LeReun C, Diamantopoulos A, Mitchell S, Gaynes BN. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in patients with treatment resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 12;98:152156. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152156. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31978785.
• 4. Cocores AN, Smirnoff L, Greco G, Herrera R, Monteith TS. Update on Neuromodulation for Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders: Recent Advances and New Indications. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Feb 15;29(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01314-7. PMID: 39954214; PMCID: PMC11829934.
• 5. González HFJ, Yengo-Kahn A, Englot DJ. Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;30(2):219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.12.005. PMID: 30898273; PMCID: PMC6432928.
• 6. Kahlow H, Olivecrona M. Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single center longitudinal study of 143 patients. Seizure. 2013 Dec;22(10):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 15. PMID: 23867218.
• 7. van Schooten J, Smeets J, van Kuijk SM, Klinkenberg S, Schijns OEMG, Nelissen J, Wagner LGL, Rouhl RPW, Majoie MHJM, Rijkers K. Surgical complications of vagus nerve stimulation surgery: A 14-years single-center experience. Brain Spine. 2023 Dec 14;4:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102733. PMID: 38510607; PMCID: PMC10951712.
• 8. Lotan, G., Vaiman, M., 2015. Treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve from Head-and-Neck surgical point of view. Laryngoscope 125 (6), 1352–1355.
• 9. Englot DJ, Hassnain KH, Rolston JD, Harward SC, Sinha SR, Haglund MM. Quality-of-life metrics with vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy from provider survey data. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jan;66:4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Dec 11. PMID: 27974275; PMCID: PMC5258831.