A new practice in fruit trees: Centrifugal training system

Year 2013, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 65 - 75, 01.06.2013

Ersin Atay , Pierre Laurı

Abstract

The choice of the training system is a rather important decision for yield, fruit quality and profitability. There were dramatic changes in concepts for apple training in the last years. Centrifugal training system which was one of the innovations was developed in the beginning of the 2000’s in France. SolAxe training system forms the main part of this training system. The most innovative aspect of the Centrifugal training system is the artificial extinction technique. This technique is carried out more specifically in the center of the tree and on the underside of branches to remove potentially poor quality fruits. Artificial extinction improves light distribution within the tree canopy especially in colored-fruit varieties for which the light climate is particularly important. It also offers an alternative training method to reduce biennial bearing. In addition to canopy porosity created by artificial extinction, this training system can help reducing disease and harmful insects. In this study it is aimed to explain general rules of centrifugal training system.

Keywords

Tree architecture; Bending; Orchard management; Planting system; Pruning

Meyve ağaçlarında yeni bir uygulama: Merkezkaç terbiye sistemi

Abstract

Terbiye sistemi seçimi, verim, meyve kalitesi ve karlılık açısından oldukça önemlidir. Son yıllarda elma ağaçlarının terbiyesinde büyük gelişmeler kaydedilmiştir. Bu yeniliklerden birisi olan merkezkaç terbiye sistemi, 2000’li yılların başında Fransa’da geliştirilmiştir. Bu sistemin temelini SolAxe terbiye sistemi oluşturmuştur. Bu sistemin getirdiği en büyük yenilik suni spur öldürme tekniğidir. Bu teknik daha çok ağacın iç kısmında ve düşük kalitede meyve oluşturma potansiyeline sahip olduğu için dalların alt taraflarında yapılmaktadır. Taç içerisine ışık girişini sağlayan suni spur öldürme, özellikle renklenme problemi olan çeşitlerde renklenmeyi artırmak açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu terbiye tekniği aynı zamanda periyodisiteyi azaltmada bir alternatif sunmaktadır. Buna ilaveten suni olarak yaratılan taç boşluğu hastalık ve zararlı popülasyonunun azaltılmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada merkezkaç terbiye sisteminin genel prensiplerinin anlatılması amaçlanmıştır.

Keywords

Ağaç mimarisi; Eğme; Bahçe yönetimi; Dikim sistemi; Budama

References

• Costes, E., Lauri, P.E., Regnard, J.L. 2006. Analyzing Fruit Tree Architecture: Implications for Tree Management and Fruit Production. Horticultural Reviews, 32: 1-61.
• Ferree, D.C., Schupp, J.R. 2003. Pruning and Training Physiology. pp. 319-344. In: Ferree, D.C., Warrington, I.J. (eds.), Apples: botany, production and uses. CABI Publishing, Cambridge.
• Hoying, S.A., Robinson, T.L., Andersen, R.L. 2001. Improving Sweet Cheery Branching. New York Fruit Quarterly, 9: 13-16.
• Hucbourg, B., Ramonguilhem, M. 2006. Comment Diffuser Auprès Des Salariés Agricoles. Réussir Fruits et Légumes, Supplément au n, 247: 30-31.
• Lauri, P.E. 2009. Developing A New Paradigm For Apple Training. The Compact Fruit Tree, 42: 17-19.
• Lauri, P.E., Lespinasse, J.M. 2000. The Vertical Axis and Solaxe Systems in France. Acta Horticulturae, 513: 287-296.
• Lauri, P.E., Willaume, M., Larrive, G., Lespinasse, J.M. 2004. The Concept of Centrifugal Training in Apple Aimed at Optimizing The Relationship Between Growth and Fruiting. Acta Horticulturae, 636: 35-42.
• Lauri, P.E., Crete, X., Ferre, G. 2007. Centrifugal Training in Apple–Appraisal of A Two-Year Experiment on cv. Galaxy in Southheast France. Acta Horticulturae, 732: 391-396.
• Lauri, P.E. 2008. Trends in Apple Training In France–An Architectural And Ecophysiological Perspective. Acta Horticulturae, 772: 483-490.
• Lauri, P.E., Costes, E., Regnard, J.L., Brun, L., Simon, S., Monney, P., Sinoquet, H. 2009. Does Knowledge on Fruit Tree Architecture and Its Implications for Orchard Management Improve Horticultural Sustainability? An Overview of Recent Advances in The Apple. Acta Horticulturae, 817: 243-249.
• Lauri, P.E., Hucbourg, B., Ramonguilhem, M., Mery, D. 2011. An Architectural-Based Tree Training and Pruning – Identification of Key Features in The Apple. Acta Horticulturae, 903: 589-596.
• Lespinasse, J.M., Delort, F. 1986. Apple Tree Management in Vertical Axis: Appraisal After Ten Years of Experiments. Acta Horticulturae, 160: 120-125.
• Mika, A., Buler, Z., Krawiec, A. 2003. Effects of Various Methods of Pruning Apple Trees After Planting. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 11: 33-43.
• Quinlan, J.D., Tobutt, K.R. 1990. Manipulating Fruit Tree Chemically and Genetically for Improved Performance. HortScience, 25: 60-64.
• Raffo, M.D., Rodriguez, R., Manueco, L. 2011. The Effects of Centrifugal Pruning on Fruiting Structure Production in Royal Gala Apples. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria, 38: 227-232.
• Robinson, T.L. 2003. Apple-Orchard Planting Systems. pp. 345-407. In: Ferree, D.C., Warrington, I.J. (eds.), Apples: botany, production and uses. CABI Publishing, Cambridge.
• Simon, S., Lauri, P.E., Brun, L., Defrance, H., Sauphanor, B. 2006. Does Fruit-Tree Architecture Manipulation Affect The Development of Pest and Pathogens ? – A Case Study in Apple Orchard. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 81: 765-773.
• Simon, S., Sauphanor, B., Lauri, P.E. 2007. Control of Fruit Tree Pests Through Manipulation of Tree Architecture. Pest Technology, 1: 33-37.
• Stephan, J., Lauri, P.E., Dones, N., Haddad, N., Talhouk, S., Sinoquet, H. 2007. Architecture of The Pruned Tree: Impact of Contrasted Pruning Procedures Over 2 Years on Shoot Demography and Spatial Distribution of Leaf Area in Apple (Malus domestica). Annals of Botany, 99: 1055-1065.
• Stephan, J., Sinoquet, H., Dones, N., Haddad, N., Talhouk, S., Lauri, P.E. 2008. Light Interception and Partitioning Between Shoots in Apple Cultivars Influenced by Training. Tree Physiology, 28: 331-342.
• Tustin, S., Ferree, D., Myers, S., Corelli-Grappadelli, L., Lakso, A., Robinson, T., Flore, J., Perry, R., Breitkreutz, S., Barritt, B., Konishi, B., Rom, C., Taylor, L., Webster, A., Atkinson, C., Palmer, J., Cashmore, W. 1997. The International Apple Growth Study. Acta Horticulturae, 451: 693-699.
• Tustin, D.S., Dayatilake, G.A., Breen, K.C., Oliver, M.J. 2012. Fruit Set Responses To Changes in Floral Bud Load – A New Concept for Crop Load Regulation. Acta Horticulturae, 932: 195-202.
• Willaume, M., Lauri, P.E., Herve, S. 2004. Light Interception in Apple Trees Influenced by Canopy Architecture Manipulation. Trees, 18: 705-713.