QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Umut Yıldırım; Furkan Şükür; Gani Mustafa İnegöl

doi:10.18613/deudfd.1058625

EN TR

QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Abstract

It is crucial to implement quality standards systems to achieve and maintain the requirements in maritime education and training stipulated by the International Maritime Organization and Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping Convention and Code. The study offers suggestions for analysing and improving the understanding of quality and quality criteria in maritime education. For this purpose, in line with the literature review and expert opinions, 38 sub-criteria were determined under five main criteria, and these criteria were prioritised using the Best Worst Method through the agency of 10 experts. The results of the study showed that the most fundamental criteria in the quality of maritime education and training are professional and personal development, sense of professional ethics, publication and research, and compliance with and effective use of course hours, respectively. The results of the study have also enabled educational institutions to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses in terms of quality.

Keywords

Maritime, Education, Training, Quality, Best Worst Method

Project Number

Yok

DENİZCİLİK EĞİTİM VE ÖĞRETİMİNDE KALİTE KRİTERLERİ

Abstract

Uluslararası Denizcilik Örgütü ve Gemiadamlarının Eğitim, Belgelendirme ve Vardiya Tutma Standartları Hakkında Sözleşme ve Kodu’nun öngördüğü denizcilik eğitim öğretim gereklerine ulaşmak ve sürdürebilmek için kalite standartları sistemlerinin uygulanması son derece önemlidir. Çalışmada denizcilik eğitimindeki kalite anlayışının, ölçütlerinin irdelenmesi ve geliştirilmesine yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur. Bu amaçla yapılan literatür taraması ve uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda 5 ana kriter altında 38 alt kriter belirlenmiş ve 10 uzmanın yardımıyla En İyi-En Kötü Metodu kullanılarak kriterlerin önem sıralaması yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar denizcilik eğitim ve öğretiminin kalitesinde en önemli ölçütlerin sırasıyla, akademik personel ve danışmanlık hizmetleri ana başlığı altında bulunan mesleki ve kişisel gelişim, meslek etiği anlayışı, yayın ve araştırma yapılması ve ders saatlerine uyum ve etkin kullanım olduğunu göstermiştir. Çalışma sonuçları aynı zamanda eğitim kurumlarının kalite için güçlü ve zayıf yanlarını değerlendirebilmelerini sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

Denizcilik, Eğitim, Öğretim, Kalite, En İyi-En Kötü Metodu

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Thanks

Yok

References

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. and Di Costa, F. (2011). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88(3), 915–928.
Adolf, K.Y.N., Anita C.K. and Ho W.C.J. (2009). The motivations and added values of embarking on postgraduate Professional education: Evidences from the Maritime industry. Transport Policy, 16, 251–258.
Ahmad, W. N. K. W., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S. and Tavasszy, L. A. (2017). “Evaluation of The External Forces Affecting the Sustainability of Oil and Gas Supply Chain Using Best–Worst Method”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252.
Ahmadi, H. B., Sarpong, S. K. and Rezaei, J. (2017). “Assessing the Social Sustainability of Supply Chains Using Best–Worst Method”. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 126, 99–106.
Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., and Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A Study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70–94.
Altınpınar, İ. and Başar, E. (2018). Comparison of the safety cultures of Turkish aviation and maritime transportation worker. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 24, 1-10.
Barnett, M., Gatfield, D., Overgaard, B., Pekcan, C. and Graveson, A. (2006). Barriers to progress or windows of opportunity? A study in career path mapping in the maritime industries. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 5(2), 127-142.
Barnett, M. L. (2005). Searching for the root causes of maritime casualties. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 4(2), 131-145. Baylon, A. and Santos, E. (2015). Attractions, Problems, Challenges, Issues and Coping Strategies of the Seafaring Career: MAAP Seafarers Perspectives. 10.1201/b18515-4.
Blagojevic, B., Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z. and Zoranovic, T. (2016). Heuristic aggregation of in- dividual judgments in ahp group decision making using simulated annealing algorithm. Information Sciences, 330, 260–273.
Brunner, J.J. (2013). “On the classification of universities”, Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigacion Educacional Latinoamericana, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 115-129.

Cavanaugh, C. (2002). Distance education quality: Success factors for resources, practice and results. Jacksonville, FL: Ideal Group.
Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann. J. P. and Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 26-37.
Charlesworth, D. (2008). Identifying Communication Apprehension Levels in Upper-Level Information Systems Majors: A Pilot Study.
Celik, M., Lavasani S. M. and Wang, J. (2010). A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Safety Science, 48(1), 18-27.
Cunningham, S. B. (2015). The relevance of maritime education and training at the secondary level. World Maritime University Dissertations, Malmo.
Dinwoodie, J. (2000). The perceived importance of employment considerations in the decisions of students to enrol on undergraduate courses in Maritime Business in Britain. Maritime Policy and Management, 27(1), 17–30.
Forman, E. and Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research, 108(1), 165–9.
Gardner, B.M., Marlow, P.B., Naim, M.M., Nair, R. and Pettit, S.J. (2007) The policy implications of market failure for the land-based jobs market for British seafarers. Marine Policy, 31(2), 117–124.
Grewal, D. and Haugstetter, H. (2007). Capturing and sharing knowledge in supply chains in the maritime transport sector: Critical issues. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(2), 169–183.
Grošelj P., Stirn, LZ., Ayrilmis, N. and Kuzman, MK. (2015). Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process. Expert System with Applications, 42(4):2198–204.
Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R. and Glaser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., 23(2), 105-123.
Gupta, H. and Barua, M.K. (2016). Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 107, 69–79.
Haun, E. (2014). The rise of primary and secondary maritime schools, From http://www.marinelink.com/
Hetherington, C., Flin, R. and Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), 401-411.
ICS (2020), https://www.ics-shipping.org/shipping-facts/shipping-and-world-trade/global-supply-and-demand-for-seafarers Access Date: 05.11.2021
IMO (International Maritime Organization), (2011) International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, including 2010 Manila Amendments, STCW Convention and STCW Code, London, 2011.
Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2014). Teachers’ Professional Development. 79–95. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers.
Mahmood, H. K., Hashmi, M. S., Shoaib, M., Danish, R., and Abbas, J. (2014). Impact of TQM practices on motivation of teachers in secondary schools’ empirical evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(6), 1–8.
Manuel, M.E., Nakazawa, T. and Kreta, S. (2013). Balancing vocational and academic education: A global profiling of maritime universities reviewed by their curricula and instructor qualifications, ISBN 978 4–907408-04-6. Tokyo: International Association of Maritime Universities. Research report
Martins, M. R. and Maturana, M.C. (2010). Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis, 30(4), 674-698.
Mohammadi, M. and Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 1-8.
Ng, A.K.Y., Koo, A. C. and Pallis, A.A. (2011). Professionalization of the shipping industry via postgraduate education. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(5), 364–373.
Pallis A. and Adolf, K.Y.NG. (2011). Pursuing maritime education: an empirical study of students’ profiles, motivations and expectations. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(4), 369–393.
Pring, R. (2001). Education as a moral practice, Journal of Moral Education, 30(2). 101-112.
Ren, J., Liang, H. and Chan, F.T. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best worst method. Technological. Forecasting Social Change. 116, 29–39.
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J. and Tavasszy, L. (2016). A Supplier Selection Life Cycle Approach İntegrating Traditional and Environmental Criteria Using the Best– Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588.
Salimi, N. and Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Eval. Program. Plann. 66, 147–155.
Shah, A., Treby, E., May, V. and Walsh, P. (2007). Bridging the divide between academia and practitioners: training coastal zone managers. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50 (11–12), 859–871.
Shaw, A., and McAndrew, J. (2008). Advancing apprentices: Developing progression routes into higher education through the development of a pilot Higher Level Apprenticeship scheme. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60(1), 133–47.
Sletner, T.C. (2000). Quality system for the implementation of STCW-95 in higher maritime education in Norway, Maritime Policy and Management, 27(1), 89-100.
Subrahmanyam, A. (2017). Relationship between service quality, satisfaction, motivation and loyalty: a multi-dimensional perspective. Qual. Assur. Education. 25(2), 171-188.
Tanggaard, L. (2005). Collaborative teaching and learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 57(1), 109–22.
Taussik J. (1998). Interdisciplinary education: the masters programme in coastal and marine resource management at the University of Portsmouth, UK. Ocean and Coastal Management, 41:115–122.
Theotokas I. (2007). Top of world shipping: Greek shipping companies: organization and management. In: Pallis AA (ed) Maritime transport: The Greek paradigm. Elsevier, London, pp 63–93.
Thomas, G., Harte, D. and Pointing, D. (2013). Developing Student Skills through Industry-aligned and Team focussed Design Projects. Paper presented at the Education and Professional Development of Engineers in the Maritime Industry, Singapore, 26–27 February.
Tobias, R. (2003). Continuing professional education and professionalization: travelling without a map or compass? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 445–456.
UNESCO. (2020). http://www.unesco.org/new/en/gefi/priorities/quality-of-learning/ Access Date: 12.10.2021
UNITED NATIONS. (2020). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/ Access Date: 10.09.2021
WHED. (2020). World Higher Education Database https://www.whed.net/About.html Access Date: 05.10.2021
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L. and Redman, C.L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain. Sci. 6 (2), 203-218.
Wu, B. (2004). Participation in the global labour market: Experience and responses of Chinese seafarers. Maritime Policy and Management, 31(1), 69–82.
Yamamoto, H. (2002), The analysis and assessment of the current reality and the future needs of the maritime education and training system, as well as the certification system in the international maritime society, IAMU Journal, 2, 65-72.
Yıldırım, U., Başar, E. and Uğurlu, O. (2019) Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods. Safety Science, 119, 412–425.
Yoo, S., Jung, D., Yang, H., Moon, E. and Hwang, Y. (2019). Seeking the meaning of quality education: Paradigm changes from the 1960s to the 2010s, KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 107-122.
Zilahy, G. and Huisingh, D. (2009). The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(12), 1057-1066.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Maritime Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Umut Yıldırım ^*
0000-0002-3991-5457
Türkiye

Furkan Şükür This is me
0000-0001-8737-1485
Türkiye

Gani Mustafa İnegöl This is me
0000-0002-8333-7340
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2022

Submission Date

January 16, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 17, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 14 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33LC32PL

APA

Yıldırım, U., Şükür, F., & İnegöl, G. M. (2022). QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 236-263. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625

AMA

1.Yıldırım U, Şükür F, İnegöl G M. QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;14(2):236-263. doi:10.18613/deudfd.1058625

Chicago

Yıldırım, Umut, Furkan Şükür, and Gani Mustafa İnegöl. 2022. “QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (2): 236-63. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625.

EndNote

Yıldırım U, Şükür F, İnegöl G M (December 1, 2022) QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 14 2 236–263.

IEEE

[1]U. Yıldırım, F. Şükür, and G. M. İnegöl, “QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 236–263, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.18613/deudfd.1058625.

ISNAD

Yıldırım, Umut - Şükür, Furkan - İnegöl, Gani Mustafa. “QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 14/2 (December 1, 2022): 236-263. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625.

JAMA

1.Yıldırım U, Şükür F, İnegöl G M. QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;14:236–263.

MLA

Yıldırım, Umut, et al. “QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 236-63, doi:10.18613/deudfd.1058625.

Vancouver

1.Umut Yıldırım, Furkan Şükür, Gani Mustafa İnegöl. QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022 Dec. 1;14(2):236-63. doi:10.18613/deudfd.1058625

Cited By

Türkiye’de Deniz ve Liman İşletmeciliği Ön Lisans Eğitimi Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Iğdır Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.58618/igdiriibf.1296710

School engagement and occupational readiness in maritime vocational education: A structural equation modeling approach

Marine Science and Technology Bulletin

https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1697022

Articles published in this journal can not be used without referring to the journal. The authors are scientifically for their manuscripts.

Maritime Faculty Journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) or submission charges.

Dokuz Eylul University Publishing House Web Page
https://kutuphane.deu.edu.tr/yayinevi/

Journal Contact Details Page
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/deudfd/contacts

27606 13880 13876 27184 27186