THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL AND RELATIONSHIP MARKETING ON SALES PERFORMANCE: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON YACHTING BUSINESS

Year 2017, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 186 - 211, 01.12.2017

Ali Ender Altunoğlu Derya Atlay Işık Ramazan Erbilgin

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.354392

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In
this study, it is aimed to investigate the ability of yacht brokers operating
in yacht business concerning the levels of social capital formation and the
effectiveness of relationship marketing practices and the interaction effects
of these two concepts on sales performance in general. For this purpose, from
resource based view, the effects of social capital and relational marketing
methods on the sales performance of yacht enterprises, which will provide
competitive advantage to businesses, reduce their costs, increase profit rates,
develop new customers or develop long lasting and stronger relationships with
existing customers, has been investigated in this exploratory research. In this article, firstly the concepts of social
capital and relational marketing and its components have been explained through
literature review. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via 14-person
yacht brokers by using the developed data collection tool. Findings from the
data analyzed by the Nvivo7 program show that yacht brokers provide positive
benefits from strong and active social networks, due to the knowledge and trust
they have gained as a marketing specialist. Furthermore,
it can be said that maintaining confidence in the framework of trust and
establishing long-term strong relationships positively affect the performance
of yacht brokers.

Keywords

Resource Based View (RBV), Social Capital, Relationship Marketing, Sales Performance, Yacht Brokerage

SOSYAL SERMAYE VE İLİŞKİSEL PAZARLAMANIN SATIŞ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ: YAT İŞLETMECİLİĞİNE YÖNELİK NİTEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, yat işletmeleri
kapsamında faaliyet gösteren yat brokerlerinin, sosyal sermayeyi oluşturma
düzeyleri ile ilişkisel pazarlama uygulamalarını etkin kullanma becerileri ve
bu iki kavramın etkileşiminin genel olarak satış performanslarına etkilerinin
araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç
doğrultusunda kaynak tabanlı bakış açısıyla işletmelere rekabet avantajı
sağlayacak, maliyetlerini düşürüp, kar oranlarını artıracak, yeni müşteriler
kazanmalarını veya var olan müşterileriyle uzun süreli ve daha sağlam ilişkiler
geliştirecek sosyal sermaye ve ilişkisel pazarlama yöntemlerinin, yat
işletmelerinin satış performanslarına etkisi keşifsel bir araştırmayla
incelenmiştir. Bu makalede öncelikle sosyal sermaye ve ilişkisel
pazarlama kavramları ve bileşenleri
literatür taraması yapılarak açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Geliştirilen veri
toplama aracı kullanılarak 14 kişiden oluşan yat brokerleri ile yarı
yapılandırılmış mülakatlar yürütülmüştür. Sonrasında Nvivo7 programı ile analiz
edilen verilerden elde edilen bulgular göstermektedir ki yat brokerleri
bir pazarlama uzmanı olarak elde ettikleri bilgi ve güven sayesinde, güçlü ve
aktif sosyal ağlardan pozitif olarak yarar sağlamaktadırlar. Ayrıca, güven
çerçevesinde ilişkilerin devamını sağlamak ve uzun dönemli güçlü ilişkilerin
kurulması yat brokerlerinin performansını pozitif etkilediği ifade edilebilir.

Keywords

Kaynak Tabanlı Yaklaşım (KTY), Sosyal Sermaye, İlişkisel Pazarlama, Satış Performansı, Yat Brokerliği

References

• Açıkgöz, B. T. (2012). Stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimine aşamalı bir bakış: Strateji, sürdürülebilir rekabetçi üstünlük ve kaynak tabanlı yaklaşımın kesişme. İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri Ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 14(4),107-130
• Ainuddin, R., Beamish, P., Hulland, J., ve Rouse, M. (2007). Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 42, 47– 60.
• Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. Ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
• Atlay Işık, D. (2011). Yat Turizminde Holistik Pazarlama ve Türkiye İçin Farklılaştırma Stratejileri. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 101-109
• Bauer, H. ve Grether, M. (2005). Virtual Community, Its Contribution to Customer Relationships by Providing Social Capital, Journal of Relationship Marketing, 4(1-2), 91-109.
• Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship Marketing of Services-Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
• Blois, K. (1999). Relationship Marketing in Organizational Markets- assential its cost and benefits. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 4, 181-189
• Bonner, J., Kim, D., ve Cavusgil, S. (2005). Self-perceived strategic network identity and its effects on market performance in alliance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1371–1380.
• Burt, R. S. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
• Chrisholm, A., ve Nielsen, K. (2009). Social capital and the resource-based view of the firm. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 39(2), 7–32.
• Christopher, M., Payne, A. ve Ballantyne, D. (1991). Relationship Marketing: bringing quality, customer service and marketing together. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-105.
• Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
• Collis, D. J. (1994). Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143-149.
• Collis, D. ve Montgomery, C. (1995). Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 119-126.
• Davidsson, P. ve Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331.
• Denktaş Şakar, G. (2013). Gemi Brokerliğinde İlişki Pazarlaması, Denizcilik İşletmeleri Yönetimi İçinde, Editörler: A. G. Cerit, A. Deveci, S. Esmer, İstanbul: Beta Basım.
• Ferguson, C.H. (1990), Computers and the coming of the US keiretsu, Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 55-70.
• Garavan, T. N. (2007). A strategic perspective on human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(1), 11-30.
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 115-124
• Grant RM. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17, 109–122.
• Grönroos, C., (1996). Relationship Marketing: Strategic and Tactical Implications. Management Decision, 34(3), 5-14.
• Hwang, K.-K. (1987), Face and favor: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944-74.
• İçöz, O. (2006). Seyahat Acentaları ve Tur Operatörlüğü Yönetimi, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
• Jütter, U. ve Wehrli, H. P. (1994). Relationship Marketing from a Value System Perspective. International Jaurnal of Service Industry Management, 5, 54-73.
• Kogut B, Zander U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.
• Kotler, P ve Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of Marketing. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Lages, L., Silva, G., Styles, C., ve Pereira, Z. (2009). The NEP scale: A measure of network export performance. International Business Review, 18(4), 344–356.
• Lesser, E.L. (2000). “Leveraging social capital in organizations”, in Lesser, E.L. (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, pp.3-16.Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA.
• Lingreen, A. (2001). A Framework for Studying Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58,July, 28-30.
• Malley, L. ve Prothero, A. (2004). Beyond the Frills of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1286-1294.
• Marzo, M., Pedraja, M. ve Riverra, M. (2004). The Benefits of Relationship Marketing for the Consumer and for the Fashion Retailers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 8, 425-436.
• Mc Allister D. J. (1995). Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundatitions for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-60.
• Moran, P., ve Ghoshal, S. (1996). Value creation by firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 41-45.
• Morgan, R. M. ve Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 22-28.
• Nahapiet, J., ve Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266
• Okpara, J. (2009). Strategic choices, export orientation and export performance of SMEs in Nigeria. Management Decision, 47(8),1281–1299.
• Paliszkiewicz, J.L., (2011). Trust And Knowledge Sharing A Critical Combination, Polish Association For Knowledge Management Series: Studies & Proceedings, 42, 168-175.
• Parayitam, S. ve Guru-Gharana, K. (2010). Economics of Resource Based and Dynamic Capabilities View: A Contemporary Framework. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 83-93
• Paxton, P. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment, American Journal of Sociology, 5(1), 88-127.
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton.
• Ravald, A. ve Grönroos, C., (1996). The Value Concept And Relationship Marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19-30.
• Reichheld, F. F. (1992). Loyalty-based management. Harvard business review,71(2), 64-73.
• Rouzies D., ve Hulland J, (2014). Does marketing and sales integration always pay off? Evidence from a social capital perspective. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 42, 511–527
• Sager J, Ferris G. (1986). Personality and salesforce selection in the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 15, 319-324.
• Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Satisfaction in Buyer-Seller Relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 305-322.
• Sin, L., Tse, A., Yau, O., Lee, J. ve Chow, R. (2002). The Effect of Relationship Marketing Orientation on Business Performance in a Service-oriented Economy. Journal of Service Marketing, 16(7), 656-676.
• Sujan, H., Sujan, M., ve Bettman, J. R. (1988). Knowledge structure differences between more effective and less effective salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 81-86.
• Tandoğan, V.U. (1996). Yat Turizmi Talebi ve Türkiye’de Yat Turizmine ve İşletmeciliğine Analitik Bir Yaklaşım. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Temple, J. (2000). Growth Effect of Education on Social Capital in the OECD Countries. OECD Working Paper, No: 00/36.
• Tiwana A., (2002). The Knowledge Toolkit, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
• Tsai, W., ve Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resourcebased view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-175.
• Wright P. M., Dunford B. B., ve Snell S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27, 701-721.
• Yang J., Alejandro T.G.B. ve Boles J.S., (2011), The role of social capital and knowledge transfer in selling center performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(3), 152-161.
• Zineldin, M. (2000). Beyond Relationship Marketing: Technolojicalship Marketing. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18, 9-23.