Araştırma Makalesi

Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir?

Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3 17 Aralık 2017
  • Süleyman Özkan Aksoy
  • Ali İbrahim Sevinç
  • Merih Güray
  • Pınar Balcı
PDF İndir
EN TR

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Necessary In Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

Öz

Objective: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a proliferation of mammary ductal epithelial cells that does not cross the basal membrane and has no evidence of invasion. One of the recent arguments is that a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is required for high risk of invasive disease in DCIS cases.

Material and method: We retrospectively reviewed SLNB results in a total of 144 DCIS patients, 112 with microinvasive foci and 32 with mastectomy indication between 1996 and 2016 in our clinic.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 53 (36-77) years. A total of 103 (71%) of the cases were treated with wire-guided biopsy, 34 (24%) with wide local excision, and 7 (5%) with subareolar exploration for histopathological diagnosis. Histopathological examination showed no invasion of any sentinel lymph node specimen. Radiotherapy and hormonotherapy were applied to patients with microinvasion and only hormonotherapy was applied to the patients treated with mastectomy as adjuvant therapy. There was no recurrence of axillary lesions in the average follow-up of 48 months.

Conclusion: As axillary metastases were found to be quite low (<1%) in DCIS, axillary lymph node sampling should not be routinely performed in these patients. Axillary sampling may be done with SLNB in DCIS patients with microinvasive foci or having mastectomy indication, avoiding possible morbidity of axillary dissection.



Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Referans1 Klauber-DeMore N, Tan LK, Liberman L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma- in-situ with microinvasion? Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:636-42.
  2. Referans2 Silverstein MJ, Waisman JR, Gamagami P, et al. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast (208 cases). Clinical factors influencing treatment choice. Cancer 1990;66:102-8.
  3. Referans3 Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL. Ductal carcinoma In situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer I 2010;102:170–8. 

  4. Referans4 Nicholson S, Hanby A, Clements K, et al. Variations in the manage- ment of the axilla in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: evidence from the UK NHS breast screening programme audit of screen detected DCIS. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:86–93.
  5. Referans5 Chang WC, Hsu HH, Yu JC, et al. Underestimation of invasive lesions in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast diagnosed by ultrasound-guided biopsy: a comparison between patients with and without HER2/neu overexpression. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:935–41. 

  6. Referans6 Liu CQ, Guo Y, Shi JY, Sheng Y. Late morbidity associated with a tumour- negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:1560–8. Referans7 Zetterlund L, Stemme S, Arnrup H, de Boniface J. Incidence of and risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Surg 2014;101:488-94. Referans8. Intra M, Rotmensz N, Veronesi P, et al. Sentinel node biopsy is not a standard procedure in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology on 854 patients in 10 years. Ann Surg 2008;247:315-9.
  7. Referans9. Sener SF, Winchester DJ, Martz CH, et al. Lymphedema after sentinel lympha- denectomy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92:748-52.
  8. Referans10. Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA 2009;302:1985-92.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Süleyman Özkan Aksoy Bu kişi benim

Ali İbrahim Sevinç Bu kişi benim

Merih Güray Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Aralık 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Haziran 2017

Kabul Tarihi

27 Temmuz 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aksoy, S. Ö., Sevinç, A. İ., Güray, M., & Balcı, P. (2017). Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 147-151. https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB
AMA
1.Aksoy SÖ, Sevinç Aİ, Güray M, Balcı P. Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir? DEU Tıp Derg. 2017;31(3):147-151. https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB
Chicago
Aksoy, Süleyman Özkan, Ali İbrahim Sevinç, Merih Güray, ve Pınar Balcı. 2017. “Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 31 (3): 147-51. https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB.
EndNote
Aksoy SÖ, Sevinç Aİ, Güray M, Balcı P (01 Aralık 2017) Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir? Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 31 3 147–151.
IEEE
[1]S. Ö. Aksoy, A. İ. Sevinç, M. Güray, ve P. Balcı, “Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir?”, DEU Tıp Derg, c. 31, sy 3, ss. 147–151, Ara. 2017, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB
ISNAD
Aksoy, Süleyman Özkan - Sevinç, Ali İbrahim - Güray, Merih - Balcı, Pınar. “Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 31/3 (01 Aralık 2017): 147-151. https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB.
JAMA
1.Aksoy SÖ, Sevinç Aİ, Güray M, Balcı P. Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir? DEU Tıp Derg. 2017;31:147–151.
MLA
Aksoy, Süleyman Özkan, vd. “Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir?”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 31, sy 3, Aralık 2017, ss. 147-51, https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB.
Vancouver
1.Süleyman Özkan Aksoy, Ali İbrahim Sevinç, Merih Güray, Pınar Balcı. Duktal karsinoma in situ da sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi gerekli midir? DEU Tıp Derg [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2017;31(3):147-51. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA54TH74XB