Absence of Unilateral Permanent Mandibular Second Premolar: A Case Report

Year 2018, , 116 - 120, 01.06.2018

Hüseyin Ozan Şahin Tamer Türk

https://doi.org/10.21306/jids.2018.183

Abstract

Excluding third molars, mandibular second premolars are the teeth most often congenitally missing, followed by the maxillary lateral incisors. Spontaneous or orthodontic space closure, removable or fixed partial prosthesis, implant and autotransplantation may be preferred depending on the age of the patient and the condition of the occlusion as a treatment approach in such cases. This case report describes treatment of mandibular midline correction with fixed mechanics after the extraction of permanent mandibular left 1. premolar in a 13-year-old male patient

Keywords

Mandibular, Second premolar, Orthodontics

Unilateral Daimi Mandibular İkinci Premolar Eksikliği: Olgu Sunumu

Abstract

Üçüncü molarlar hariç maksiller laterallerden sonra en sık karşılaşılan diş eksikliği olguları mandibular ikinci premolar eksikliğidir. Böyle olgularda tedavi yaklaşımı olarak hastanın yaşına ve oklüzyonun durumuna göre; spontan veya ortodontik boşluk kapatma, hareketli veya sabit parsiyal protezler, implant ve ototransplantasyon tercih edilebilir. Bu olgu sunumunda; mandibular sağ 2. premolar eksikliği olan ve süt 2. moların erken çekimi sonucu boşluğun spontan kapandığı gözlenen 13 yaşındaki erkek hastada orta hat sapmasının sol 1. premolar çekimiyle düzeltilmesi sunulmaktadır

Keywords

Alt çene, İkinci premolar, Ortodonti

References

• 1. Nick-Hussein, N.N., Hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a study of its prevalence in Malaysian children. Australian orthodontic journal, 1989. 11(2): p. 93.
• 2. Joondeph, D.R. and R.W. McNeill, Congenitally absent second premolars: an interceptive approach. American journal of orthodontics, 1971. 59(1): p. 50-66.
• 3. Boruchov, M.J. and L.J. Green, Hypodontia in human twins and families. American journal of orthodontics, 1971. 60(2): p. 165-174.
• 4. Davis, P.J., Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth in Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 1987. 15(4): p. 218-220.
• 5. Svedmyr, B., Genealogy and consequences of congenitally missing second premolars. Journal of the International Association of Dentistry for Children, 1983. 14(2): p. 77- 82.
• 6. Odman, J., et al., The effect of osseointegrated implants on the dento-alveolar development. A clinical and radiographic study in growing pigs. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 1991. 13(4): p. 279-286.
• 7. Zuccati, G., Implant therapy in cases of agenesis. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, 1993. 27(7): p. 369.
• 8. Lindqvist, B., Extraction of the deciduous second molar in hypodontia. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 1980. 2(3): p. 173-181.
• 9. Sabri, R., Management of congenitally missing second premolars with orthodontics and single-tooth implants. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2004. 125(5): p. 634-642.
• 10. Bjo, A. and V. Skieller, Facial development and tooth eruption: An implant study at the age of puberty. American journal of orthodontics, 1972. 62(4): p. 339-383.
• 11. Josefsson, E., et al., Treatment of lower second premolar agenesis by autotransplantation: four-year evaluation of eighty patients. Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 1999. 57(2): p. 111-115.
• 12. Kokich, V.O., Congenitally missing teeth: orthodontic management in the adolescent patient. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2002. 121(6): p. 594-595.