Orthodontic Brackets; Part II

Year 2018, Issue: 3, 134 - 140, 01.12.2018

Orhan Çiçek , Nurhat Özkalaycı

https://doi.org/10.21306/jids.2018.123

Abstract

The key to success in current orthodontic treatments is accurate diagnosis and planning. The most important factor in the efficacy and success of treatment after correct diagnosis and planning is the ability of orthodontists to select appropriate orthodontic appliances for the specific case. In this way, it is revealed that the knowledge of orthodontic appliances related materials known to the orthodontists is an extremely sensitive topic. Bracket materials, which are essential components of fixed orthodontic treatments, take their share of innovation from technological developments, and scientists are producing and introducing new types. Thus, every orthodontist will have the opportunity to use the bracket device which is special bracket prescription to the case, who are curious regarding to new devices, and experienced or want to use. Studies include classification and description of bracket materials which are the most important passive elements of fixed orthodontic mechanics were collected and the topic was revised

Keywords

Bracket, Description, Orthodontics, Prescription.

Ortodontik Braketler; Bölüm II

Abstract

Güncel ortodontik tedavilerde başarının anahtarı doğru teşhis ve planlamadır. Doğru teşhis ve planlamanın ardından tedavinin etkinliğinde ve başarıyla sonuçlanmasında en önemli faktör ortodontistlerin olguya özel uygun ortodontik aygıtları seçme yetenekleridir. Böylelikle ortodontik aygıtlarla ilgili materyal bilgisinin ortodontistlerce bilinmesinin son derece hassas bir konu olduğu karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Sabit ortodontik tedavilerin vazgeçilmez unsuru olan braket materyalleri teknolojik gelişmelerle elde edilen yeniliklerden kendine düşen payını almakta ve bilim adamlarınca yeni türlerinin üretilmesi ve tanıtılması gerçekleşmektedir. Böylece her ortodontist olguya özel braket tipini, merak ettiği ve tecrübe ettiği veya kullanmak istediği braket aygıtını kullanma imkânı bulmuş olacaktır. Sunulan çalışmada, sabit ortodontik mekaniklerin en önemli pasif elemanı olan braket materyallerinin sınıflandırılması ve tanımlanmalarına ilişkin çalışmalar incelenmiş ve konu derlenmiştir

Keywords

Braket, Tanımlama, Ortodonti, Braket tipi.

References

• 1. Tamizharasi KS, Kumar S. Evolution of orthodontic brackets. JIADS 2010; 1(3): 25-30.
• 2. Gange P. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147(4):S56-63.
• 3. Khan H. Orthodontic Brackets Selection, Placement and Debonding 2015.
• 4. Dewel BF. The Ribbon arch: Its influence in the development of orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 1981;51(4):263-268.
• 5. Fastlicht S. Evolution of the universal appliance. Am J Orthod 1950;36(6):433-444.
• 6. Begg PR. Differential force in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1956;42(7):481-510.
• 7. Flowers RC. Variations of the Begg technique: A preliminary report. Am J Orthod 1961;47(4):286-307.
• 8. Kesling PC. Expanding the horizons of the edgewise arch wire slot. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94(1):26- 37.
• 9. Postlethwaite K. Trade Products News from the British Orthodontic Conference, Manchester, 1992. British Journal of Orthodontics 1993;20(2):151-154.
• 10. Ricketts RM. Bioprogressive therapy as an answer to orthodontic needs part I. Am J Orthod 1976;70(3):241-268.
• 11. Brandt, S. JCO Interviews Dr Brainerd F. Swain on current appliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1980;14:250-264.
• 12. Lewis PD. U.S. Patent No. 2,854,747. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 1958.
• 13. Phulari BS. History of Orthodontics. JP Medical Ltd 2013.
• 14. Steiner CC. U.S. Patent No. 3,307,261. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 1967.
• 15. Broussard GJ, Broussard CJ, Buck HR, Shia GJ. Clinical applications of the Broussard auxiliary edgewise bracket. Am J Orthod. 1964;50(12):881-899.
• 16. Sved A. Principles and technique of modified edgewise arch mechanism. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1938;24(7):635-654.
• 17. Holdaway RA. Bracket angulation as applied to the edgewise appliance. The Angle Orthodontist1952;22(4):227-236.
• 18. Meyer M, Nelson G. Preadjusted edgewise appliances: Theory and practice. Am J Orthod 1978;73(5):485-498.
• 19. Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976;10(2):99- 114.
• 20. Roth RH. The straight wire appliance 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:632-642.
• 21. Alexander RG. The vari-simplex discipline. Part 1. Concept and appliance design. J Clin Orthod 1983;17(6):380-392.
• 22. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. Elsevier Health Sciences 2001.
• 23. Burstone, CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod 1982;82(5):361-378.
• 24. Root, TL. The level anchorage system for correction of orthodontic malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1981;80(4):395- 410.
• 25. Andreiko C. Craig Andreiko, DDS, MS, on the Elan and Orthos systems. Interview by Dr. Larry W. White. J Clin Orthod 1994;28(8):459-468.
• 26. Hilgers JJ. A bracket evolution, a systems revolution. Clin Imp 1996;5(4):8-14.
• 27. Fujita K. New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket mushroom arch wire appliance. Am J Orthod 1979;76(6):657-675.
• 28. Gottsegen MI. Self-ligating brackets: Looking back and going forward. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138(5):532.
• 29. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(1):12.e1-12.e6.
• 30. Gottlieb EL, Wildman AJ, Hice TL, Lang HM, Lee IF, Strauch EC Jr. The Edgelok bracket. J Clin Orthod 1972;6(11):613-623.
• 31. Viazis AD. Bioefficient therapy. J Clin Orthod 1995;29(9):552-568.