Orthodontic Brackets; Part I

Year 2018, Issue: 3, 125 - 133, 01.12.2018

Nurhat Özkalaycı Orhan Çiçek

https://doi.org/10.21306/jids.2018.121

Abstract

Orthodontic bracket that holds the characteristic of being the most used material in orthodontics has a long history in modern orthodontic practice. The addition of novelties to alloys used in the production of bracket materials has brought about the enduring renewal of biomechanical and aesthetic developments. Although varying and evolving bracket materials provide appliance alternatives and advantages for orthodontists, there are some disadvantages to these changes. Various studies have been carried out and still continue regarding the treatment situations and treatment effects for each type of bracket material. In the present study, studies related to raw materials, production techniques, classification and identification of brackets used in fixed orthodontic treatment were collected and topics were revised

Keywords

Bracket, Orthodontics, Raw material, Alloy, Classification

Ortodontik Braketler; Bölüm I

Abstract

Modern ortodontik uygulamalarda en fazla kullanılan eleman olma özelliğini elinde bulunduran ortodontik braketlerin, ortodonti pratiğinde uzun bir kullanım geçmişi mevcuttur. Braket üretiminde kullanılan alaşımlara yenilerinin eklenmesi, biyomekanik ve estetik gelişmelerin sürekliliğini beraberinde getirmiştir. Değişen ve gelişen braket üretim materyalleri ortodontistler için farklı alternatifler ve ilave avantajlar oluştursa da bu değişimlerin birtakım dezavantajları da görülmektedir. Braketlerin her bir çeşidi için tedavi süresince karşılaşılan durumlar ve tedaviye etkisiyle ilgili çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır ve yapılmaya da hâlâ devam edilmektedir. Sunulan çalışmada, sabit ortodontik tedavide kullanılan braketlerin üretiminde kullanılan hammaddeler, üretim teknikleri, braketlerin çeşitleriyle ilgili çalışmalar incelenmiş ve konu derlenmiştir

Keywords

Braket, Ortodonti, Ham madde, Alaşım, Sınıflandırma .

References

• Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Güngör AY. Effects of fluorosis and bleaching on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Dent 2007;1(4):230-235.
• Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: A randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998;25(4):283-287.
• Oh KT, Choo SU, Kim KM, Kim KN. A stainless steel bracket for orthodontic application. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(3):237- 244.
• Khan H. Orthodontic Brackets Selection, Placement and Debonding 2015.
• Zinelis S, Annousaki O, Makou M, Eliades T. Metallurgical characterization of orthodontic brackets produced by metal injection molding (MIM). Angle Orthod 2005;75(6):1024- 1031.
• Platt JA, Guzman A, Zuccari A, Thornburg DW, Rhodes BF, Oshida Y, Moore BK. Corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112(1):69-79.
• Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 2. Current status and projected future developments in materials and biocompatibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(2):253-262.
• Berradja A, Bratu F, Benea L, Willems G, Celis JP. Effect of sliding wear on tribocorrosion behaviour of stainless steels in a Ringer’s solution. Wear 2006;261(9):987-993.
• Haddad AC, Tortamano A, Souza AL, Oliveira PV. An in vitro comparison of nickel and chromium release from brackets. Braz Oral Res 2009;23(4):399-406.
• Nair SV, Padmanabhan R, Janardhanam P. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23(2):203-208.
• Moore MM, Harrington E, Rock WP. Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(6):579-583.
• Schiff N, Dalard F, Lissac M, Morgon L, Grosgogeat B. Corrosion resistance of three orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of three fluoride mouthwashes. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(6):541-549.
• Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. In vivo aging of orthodontic alloys: Implications for corrosion potential, nickel release, and biocompatibility. Angle Orthod 2002;72(3):222-237.
• Michelberger DJ, Eadie RL, Faulkner MG, Glover KE, Prasad NG, Major PW. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118(6):662-674.
• Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Beta titanium: A new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1980;77(2):121-132.
• Eliades T, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Athanasiou AE.
• Characterization of as-received, retrieved, and recycled stainless steel brackets. J Orofac Orthop 2003;64(2):80-87.
• Gioka C, Bourauel C, Zinelis S, Eliades T, Silikas N, Eliades G. Titanium orthodontic brackets: structure, composition, hardness and ionic release. Dent Mater 2004;20(7):693- 700.
• Brantley WA, Eliades T. Orthodontic Materials: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Germany 2001.
• Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Frictional resistance in orthodontic brackets with repeated use. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116(4):400-404.
• Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Ambrose WW, Newman JG. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part I. The passive configuration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(5):558-572.
• Orthod 1997;24(2):133-137.
• Michalske TA, Bunker BC, Freiman SW. Stress corrosion of ionic and mixed ionic/covalent solids. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 1986;69(10):721-724.
• Salem JA, Powers LM, Allen R, Calomino A. Slow crack growth and fracture toughness of sapphire for a window application. International Society for Optics and Photonics 2001;4375:41-53.
• Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study: Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98(2):145-153.
• Flores DA, Caruso JM, Scott GE, Jeiroudi MT. The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: A comparative study. Angle Orthod 1990;60(4):269-276.
• Birnie D. Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod 1990;17(1):71-75.
• Bordeaux JM, Moore RN, Bagby MD. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105(6):552-560.
• Soni KK, Thompson AM, Harmer MP, Williams DB, Chabala JM, Levi‐Setti R. Solute segregation to grain boundaries in MgO‐doped alumina. Applied Physics Letters 1995;66(21):2795-2797.
• Banerjee G. Beach and minerals: A new material resource for glass and ceramics. Bulletin of Materials Science 1998;21(4):349-354.
• Springate SD, Winchester LJ. An evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: A preliminary laboratory and clinical report. Br J Orthod 1991;18(3):203-209.
• Keith O, Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Zirconia brackets: An evaluation of morphology and coefficients of friction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106(6):605-614.
• Meguro D, Hayakawa T, Kawasaki M, Kasai K. Shear bond strength of calcium phosphate ceramic brackets to human enamel. Angle Orthod 2006;76(2):301-305.
• Douglass JB. Enamel wear caused by ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95(2):96-98.