Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme

Fatih Öznurhan; Aylin Özel

Review

Endocrown Application in Endodontic Treated Teeth: Review

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.04.2020

Fatih Öznurhan Aylin Özel

Abstract

For clinical success of root canal treatment, restoration after endodontic treatment is as important as the applications in the endodontic treatment process. The importance of maintaining the remaining healthy tooth tissue is essential to help stabilization tooth-restoration integrity, increase the amount of surface suitable for adhesion and thus positively affect the long-term success of restorative treatment. Root canal treatment teeth that have suffered excessive material loss can be supported by root canals and very successful restorations can be done. Endocrown applications will be examined in this review.

Keywords

endodontically treated teeth, endocrown, restorative treatment

References

1. Rivera EM, Yamauchi, M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth. Arch Oral Biol, 38(7), 541-46, 1993.
2. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 67(4), 458-67, 1992.
3. Huang T-JG, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. Journal of endodontics, 18(5), 209-15, 1992.
4. Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Effect of exposing dentine to sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus. International endodontic journal, 34(2), 113-19, 2001.
5. Sim T, Knowles J, Ng YL, Shelton J, Gulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. International endodontic journal, 34(2), 120-32, 2001.
6. Chia-Yu C, Jau-Shing, Kuo., Yang-Sung, Lin., Yen-Hsiang, Chang. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Dental Science, 4(3), 110-17, 2009.
7. Johnson JK, Schwartz NL, Blackwell RT. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 93(3), 597-605, 1976.
8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent, 13(Spec No), 9B-13B, 2000.
9. Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. Journal of prosthodontic research, 55(2), 69-74, 2011.
10. Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(6):617-23.
11. McDonald A, King P, Setchell D. An in vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root‐treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990;23(6):304-12.
12. Strub J, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artiﬁ cial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(2):120-4.
13. Burke F, Shaglouf A, Combe E, Wilson N. Fracture resistance of ﬁ ve pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Operative Dent 1999;25(5):388-94.
14. Isidor F, Brøndum K, Ravnholt G. The inﬂ uence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1998;12(1):78-82.
15. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Edward J, JE S. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2010.
16. Shillingburg H, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Provisional restorations. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, 4, 225-56, 1997.
17. Khera SC, Chan KC, Rittman BR. Dentinal crazing and interpin distance. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 40(5), 538-43, 1978.
18. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 63(5), 529-36, 1990.
19. Stankiewicz N, Wilson P. The ferrule effect: a literature review. International endodontic journal, 35(7), 575-81, 2002.
20. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. Journal of endodontics, 38(1), 11-19, 2012.
21. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry: PPAD, 7(5), 83-94, 1995.
22. SIEBEK C. A Key to Enhancing Natural Esthetics in Anterior Restorations: The Light‐Optical Behavior of Spinell Luminaries. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 8(3), 101-06, 1996.
23. Takeda T, Shigami K, Shimada A, Ohki K. A study of discoloration of the gingiva by artificial crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 9(2), 1996.
24. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: the state of the art. Quintessence international, 30(6), 1999.
25. Putignano A, Poderi G, Cerutti A, Cury A, Monticelli F, Goracci C ve ark. An in vitro study on the adhesion of quartz fiber posts to radicular dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 9(5), 2007.
26. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Restored with Quartz Fiber--Reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16(1), 2003.
27. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. Journal of dentistry, 27(4), 275-78, 1999.
28. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 83(4), 412-17, 2000.
29. Affairs ADACoS. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc, 134(4), 463-72, 2003.
30. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 127(9), 1397-98, 1996.
31. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 68(4), 584-90, 1992.
32. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou‐Koubia E, Tolidis K. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 30(12), 1216-22, 2003.
33. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Dental Traumatology, 6(2), 49-55, 1990.
34. Can Say E, Kayahan, B., Ozel, E., Gokce, K., Soyman, M., Bayirli, G. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract,, 7(2), 17-25, 2006.
35. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 1, 255-66, 1999.
36. Biacchi G, Basting R. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Operative dentistry, 37(2), 130-36, 2012.
37. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Operative dentistry, 40(2), 201-10, 2015.
38. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Yamanel K, Arhun N. 1 year clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oral health and dental management, 13(2), 366-71, 2014.
39. Tsai Y-L, Petsche PE, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 11(1), 1998.
40. Mörmann WH, Bindl A, Lüthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 11(4), 1998.
41. Valentina V, Aleksander T, Dejan T, Vojkan L. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with allceramic endo-crowns- case report. Stom Glas S 2008;55:54-64.
42. Chang CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS, Chang YH. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endocrowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dentai Sciences 2009;4:110-7.
43. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-6.
44. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:383-90.
45. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater 2013;29:e309-17.
46. Hasan I, Frentzen M, Utz KH, Hoyer D, Langenbach A, Bourauel C. Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load. J Dent Biomech 2012;3:1758736012455421. doi: 10.1177/1758736012455421 .
47. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:242-8.
48. Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Cattani-Lorente M, Feilzer AJ, Scherrer S, Krejci I. The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated.
49. Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Poncet A, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading. Odontology 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-02029.
50. Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Oper Dent 2016;41:76-82.
51. Magne P. IDS: Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:594.
52. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40:201-10.
53. Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, Ardu S, Krejci I, Rocca GT. Microhardness of light- and dualpolymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:942-8.

Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.04.2020

Fatih Öznurhan Aylin Özel

Abstract

Kanal tedavili dişlerin klinik başarısı için endodontik tedavi sonrası uygulanan restorasyon da endodontik tedavi sürecindeki uygulamalar kadar önem taşımaktadır. Kalan sağlıklı diş dokusunu korumanın önemi, diş-restorasyon bütünlüğünün stabilizasyonunu sağlamaya yardımcı olması, adezyon için uygun yüzey miktarının artması ve böylece restoratif tedavinin uzun dönem başarısını olumlu yönde etkilemesi için gereklidir. Aşırı madde kaybına uğramış kanal tedavili dişlerde kök kanallarından destek alınarak çok başarılı restorasyonlar yapılabilmektedir. Bu derlemede endokuron uygulamaları incelenecektir.

Keywords

endodontik tedavi, endokuron, restoratif tedavi

References

1. Rivera EM, Yamauchi, M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth. Arch Oral Biol, 38(7), 541-46, 1993.
2. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 67(4), 458-67, 1992.
3. Huang T-JG, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. Journal of endodontics, 18(5), 209-15, 1992.
4. Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Effect of exposing dentine to sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus. International endodontic journal, 34(2), 113-19, 2001.
5. Sim T, Knowles J, Ng YL, Shelton J, Gulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. International endodontic journal, 34(2), 120-32, 2001.
6. Chia-Yu C, Jau-Shing, Kuo., Yang-Sung, Lin., Yen-Hsiang, Chang. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Dental Science, 4(3), 110-17, 2009.
7. Johnson JK, Schwartz NL, Blackwell RT. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 93(3), 597-605, 1976.
8. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent, 13(Spec No), 9B-13B, 2000.
9. Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. Journal of prosthodontic research, 55(2), 69-74, 2011.
10. Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(6):617-23.
11. McDonald A, King P, Setchell D. An in vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root‐treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990;23(6):304-12.
12. Strub J, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artiﬁ cial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(2):120-4.
13. Burke F, Shaglouf A, Combe E, Wilson N. Fracture resistance of ﬁ ve pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Operative Dent 1999;25(5):388-94.
14. Isidor F, Brøndum K, Ravnholt G. The inﬂ uence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1998;12(1):78-82.
15. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Edward J, JE S. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2010.
16. Shillingburg H, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Provisional restorations. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, 4, 225-56, 1997.
17. Khera SC, Chan KC, Rittman BR. Dentinal crazing and interpin distance. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 40(5), 538-43, 1978.
18. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 63(5), 529-36, 1990.
19. Stankiewicz N, Wilson P. The ferrule effect: a literature review. International endodontic journal, 35(7), 575-81, 2002.
20. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. Journal of endodontics, 38(1), 11-19, 2012.
21. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry: PPAD, 7(5), 83-94, 1995.
22. SIEBEK C. A Key to Enhancing Natural Esthetics in Anterior Restorations: The Light‐Optical Behavior of Spinell Luminaries. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 8(3), 101-06, 1996.
23. Takeda T, Shigami K, Shimada A, Ohki K. A study of discoloration of the gingiva by artificial crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 9(2), 1996.
24. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: the state of the art. Quintessence international, 30(6), 1999.
25. Putignano A, Poderi G, Cerutti A, Cury A, Monticelli F, Goracci C ve ark. An in vitro study on the adhesion of quartz fiber posts to radicular dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 9(5), 2007.
26. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Restored with Quartz Fiber--Reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16(1), 2003.
27. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. Journal of dentistry, 27(4), 275-78, 1999.
28. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 83(4), 412-17, 2000.
29. Affairs ADACoS. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc, 134(4), 463-72, 2003.
30. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 127(9), 1397-98, 1996.
31. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 68(4), 584-90, 1992.
32. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou‐Koubia E, Tolidis K. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 30(12), 1216-22, 2003.
33. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Dental Traumatology, 6(2), 49-55, 1990.
34. Can Say E, Kayahan, B., Ozel, E., Gokce, K., Soyman, M., Bayirli, G. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract,, 7(2), 17-25, 2006.
35. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 1, 255-66, 1999.
36. Biacchi G, Basting R. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Operative dentistry, 37(2), 130-36, 2012.
37. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Operative dentistry, 40(2), 201-10, 2015.
38. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Yamanel K, Arhun N. 1 year clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oral health and dental management, 13(2), 366-71, 2014.
39. Tsai Y-L, Petsche PE, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 11(1), 1998.
40. Mörmann WH, Bindl A, Lüthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 11(4), 1998.
41. Valentina V, Aleksander T, Dejan T, Vojkan L. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with allceramic endo-crowns- case report. Stom Glas S 2008;55:54-64.
42. Chang CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS, Chang YH. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endocrowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dentai Sciences 2009;4:110-7.
43. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-6.
44. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:383-90.
45. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater 2013;29:e309-17.
46. Hasan I, Frentzen M, Utz KH, Hoyer D, Langenbach A, Bourauel C. Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load. J Dent Biomech 2012;3:1758736012455421. doi: 10.1177/1758736012455421 .
47. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:242-8.
48. Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Cattani-Lorente M, Feilzer AJ, Scherrer S, Krejci I. The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated.
49. Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Poncet A, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading. Odontology 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10266-015-02029.
50. Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Oper Dent 2016;41:76-82.
51. Magne P. IDS: Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:594.
52. El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2015;40:201-10.
53. Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, Ardu S, Krejci I, Rocca GT. Microhardness of light- and dualpolymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:942-8.

There are 53 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Subjects	Dentistry
Journal Section	Collection
Authors	Fatih Öznurhan This is me 0000-0002-7797-0932 Aylin Özel This is me 0000-0001-8925-4012
Publication Date	April 30, 2020
Published in Issue	Year 2020 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA	Öznurhan, F., & Özel, A. (2020). Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi), 6(1), 1-7.
AMA	Öznurhan F, Özel A. Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme. J Int Dent Sci. April 2020;6(1):1-7.
Chicago	Öznurhan, Fatih, and Aylin Özel. “Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme”. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi) 6, no. 1 (April 2020): 1-7.
EndNote	Öznurhan F, Özel A (April 1, 2020) Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi) 6 1 1–7.
IEEE	F. Öznurhan and A. Özel, “Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme”, J Int Dent Sci, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020.
ISNAD	Öznurhan, Fatih - Özel, Aylin. “Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme”. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi) 6/1 (April 2020), 1-7.
JAMA	Öznurhan F, Özel A. Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme. J Int Dent Sci. 2020;6:1–7.
MLA	Öznurhan, Fatih and Aylin Özel. “Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme”. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi), vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-7.
Vancouver	Öznurhan F, Özel A. Kuron Harabiyeti Olan Kanal Tedavili Dişlerde Endokuron Uygulamaları: Derleme. J Int Dent Sci. 2020;6(1):1-7.

Article Files

Full Text

It is aimed that the Journal of International Dentistry Sciences be included in the Ulakbim TR Dizin. Necessary preparations are continuing for the issues to be published in 2020 in the TR Dizin.