ZIRCONIA SUBSTRUCTURE RESTORATION INTRAORAL REPAIR METHODS: A REVIEW

Abstract

Veneering ceramic chipping is frequently reported in the literature. Intraoral repair is an ideal solution when a chipped veneering ceramic restoration cannot be removed and replaced. The purpose of the article is to compile the conditions can cause chipping, as well as current intraoral repair protocols and guidelines, to assist clinicians decide the best treatment option by determining whether a ceramic chipping is a failure that requires prosthesis replacement, the dimensions of the fracture surface, and whether it is located in an area that contributes to occlusion.

Keywords

• Chipping
• Intraoral repair
• Zirconia

ZİRKONYA ALT YAPILI RESTORASYONLARIN AĞIZ İÇİ TAMİR YÖNTEMLERİ: DERLEME

Abstract

Üst yapı seramiğinde chipping kırıkları literatürde sıklıkla bildirilmektedir. Bu kırıkların ağız içi tamiri, restorasyonların çıkarılamadığı ya da değiştirilemediği durumlarda klinisyene tedavi alternatifi sunmaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, chipping kırıklarını etkileyen faktörleri, ağız içi tamir için mevcut protokolleri ve kılavuzları derleyerek klinisyenin, seramik kırılmasının protezin değiştirilmesini gerektiren bir başarısızlık oluşturup oluşturmadığını, kırık yüzeyinin boyutlarını ve okluzyona katkıda bulunan bir alanda yer alıp almadığını değerlendirerek uygun tedavi alternatifini belirlemesine yardımcı olmaktır.

Keywords

• Ağız içi tamir
• Chipping
• Zirkonya

References

1. 1. Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, et al. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(4):236–261.
2. 2. Agustin-Panadero R, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Ferreiroa A, et al. Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(1):e66-e73.
3. 3. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconiabased dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):449-56.
4. 4. Luo XP, Zhang L. Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 2010;19(6):465-70.
5. 5. Passos SP, Linke B, Major PW, Nychka JA. Improving the compatibility of an Y-TZP/porcelain system using a new composite interlayer composition. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.2017;65:11-19.
6. 6. Kontonasaki E, Rigos AE, Ilia C, Istantsos T. Monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge. Optical properties, wear, and clinical performance. Dent J.2019;7(3):90.
7. 7. Flask JD, Thompson GA, Singh M, Berzins DW. Edge chipping of translucent zirconia. J. Prosthet. Dent.2021. Article in press.
8. 8. Shilpa P, Narendra R, Sesha Reddy SR. Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Bonded to Different Core Materials and Their Pattern of Failure: An In Vitro Study. Cureus 2019;11:e6242.

9. 9. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 1999;15(6):426–433.
10. 10. Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, et al. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1556–1567.
11. 11. Kumchai H, Juntavee P, Sun AF, Nathanson D. Effects of Veneering Ceramic and Methods on Failure Load of Veneered Zirconia. Appl. Sci. 2021;11(5):2129.
12. 12. Ural Ç, Külünk T, Külünk Ş, Kurt M, Baba S. Determination of resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic surface using different primers. Acta Odontol Scand.2011;69:48-53.
13. 13. Chaiyabutr Y, McGowan S, Phillips KM, Kois JC, Giordano RA. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent.2008;100:194-202.
14. 14. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater.2011;27:71-82.
15. 15. Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ce- ramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent.2005;94:357-62.
16. 16. Han IH, Kang DW, Chung CH, et al. Effect of various intraoral repair systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:248–255.
17. 17. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:383–388.
18. 18. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:223–227.
19. 19. Schmitt J, Holst S, Wichmann M, et al. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: a prospective clinical 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:597–603.
20. 20. Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting. J Dent. 2012;40:527–530.
21. 21. Lops D, Mosca D, Casentini P, et al. Prognosis of zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures: a 7-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:21–23.
22. 22. Nicolaisen MH, Bahrami G, Schropp L, et al. Comparison of metal ceramic and all-ceramic three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:259–264.
23. 23. Bomicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, et al. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:22–30.
24. 24. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, et al. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:170–177.
25. 25. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:493–502.
26. 26. Limones A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Azevedo L, Romeo-Rubio M, Correia A, Gómez-Polo M. Zirconia-ceramic versus metal-ceramic posterior multiunit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Dent Assoc 2020;151(4):230–238.
27. 27. Özcan M. How to repair ceramic chipping or fracture in metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses intraorally: step-by-step procedures. J Adhes Dent 2014;16(5):491–492.
28. 28. Garbelotto LG, Maziero Volpato CA, Rocha Md, Maranghello CA, Calasans A, Ozcan M. Laboratory and clinical considerations on prosthetic zirconia infrastructures for implants. Implant Dent 2013;22(6):578-583.
29. 29. Mesquita AM, Husain NA, Molinero-Mourelle P, Özcan M. An intraoral repair method for chipping fracture of a multi-unit fixed zirconia reconstruction: a direct dental technique. European journal of dentistry. 2021;15(01):174-8.
30. 30. Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2011;28:102-11.
31. 31. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:625–642.
32. 32. Agingu C, Zhang CY, Jiang NW, Cheng H, Özcan M, Yu H. Intraoral repair of chipped or fractured veneered zirconia crowns and fixed dental prosthesis: clinical guidelines based on literature review. Journal of adhesion science and Technology. 2018;32(15):1711-23.
33. 33. Isgr G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, et al. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:465-473.
34. 34. Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman-Rodriguez JL, et al. Zirconia versus metal: a preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behavior. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(3):294-300.
35. 35. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. Longevity of repaired restorations: a aprctice based study. J Dent 2012;40:829-835.
36. 36. Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent 2016;41:S68-S78.
37. 37. Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: a review of literature. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:571-579.
38. 38. Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, et al. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:935-943.
39. 39. Kocaağaoğlu HH, Gurbulak A. An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures. Scanning. 2015;37:300-305. 
40. 40. Özcan M. Intraoral repair protocol for chipping or fracture of veneering ceramic in zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:189-190.
41. 41. Mohamed FF, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R, et al. Effects of surface treatments and cement types on the bond strength of porcelain-to porcelain repair. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:618–625.
42. 42. Saraç YŞ, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, et al. Effects of surface conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:667-672.
43. 43. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:267–274.
44. 44. Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater. 2002;18:179–188.
45. 45. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res. 2009;88:817–822.
46. 46. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Ceramic surface preparations for resin bonding. Am J Dent.1998;11:276–280.
47. 47. Özcan M, Volpato CA. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based materials to glassy matrix ceramics: how to condition and why? J. Adhes. Dent. 2015;17:292–293.
48. 48. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, et al. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:479-488.
49. 49. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31:521–525.
50. 50. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Kolbeck C, et al. In vitro repair of all-ceramic and fibre-reinforced composite crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000;8:107–112.
51. 51. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:526–531.
52. 52. Özcan M, Valandro LF, Pereira SM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:207–210.
53. 53. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, et al. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81:283-290.
54. 54. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007;23:506-512.
55. 55. Zhang S, Kocjan A, Lehmann F, et al. Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:396-403.
56. 56. Kirmali O, Kapdan A, Harorli OT, et al. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:28-32.
57. 57. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, et al. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65:241-248.
58. 58. Mirmohammadi H, Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z, et al. Innovations in bonding to zirconia based ceramics: part III. Phosphate monomer resin cements. Dent. Mater. 2010;26:786-792.
59. 59. Zhao J, Wang X, Si W, et al. Effect of resin cement selection on the microtensile bond strength of adhesively veneered 3Y-TZP. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:1105-1111.
60. 60. Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:182-187.
61. 61. Özcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:299-302.