TÜRKİYE’DE İLLER ARASI BEŞERİ SERMAYE AKIMLARI VE KENTSEL DİNAMİKLER

Abstract

Beşeri sermaye kentsel gelişmenin bir faktörü olarak yıllardır tartışılmaktadır. Düşünebilen, yaratabilen, hızlı evrimleşen durumlara gore düşünce yönünü değiştirebilen, yenilikler yapan ve yenilikçi çözümler üreten insanlar kentsel dinamizmin temelini oluşturmaktadır. Dünya literatüründe;beşeri sermayenin böyle önemli bir rol kazanmasının ardından, beşeri sermaye akımları ve mekansal gelişme arasındaki ilişkiyi anlamaya yönelik pekçok araştırma yapılmaktadır. Ancak Türk literatüründe bu tür çalışmalar; daha çok detaylı göç verisinin eksikliği nedeniyle, yetersiz kalmıştır. Bu çalışmada; açıklayıcı veri teknikleri ile, en çok göç çeken iller beşeri sermaye göç profillerine göre kümelendirilmiştir ve bu analizler neticesinde Türkiye için bazı ilginç sonuçlara da ulaşılmıştır. Örneğin; Istanbul kentsel dinamizm özelliklerin hemen hepsi için Türkiye’de dışadüşen olmasına rağmen, en değerli kentsel göç profilini kazanmak yönünde pek de şanslı olmadığı görülmektedir. Bunun yanısıra; Istanbul kadar revaçta olmayan göç çekim merkezlerinin; Kütahya, Erzurum ve Manisa gibi, eğitim, staj fırsatları, yaratılacak iş imkanları gibi politikalar ile bu kıymetli göç profilini kendine çekmek ve fayda yaratmak için fırsatlar olduğu görülmektedir. Bu sebeplerle beşeri sermaye ve onun mekan ile ilişkisi; planlama otoriteleri ve politika geliştiren çevreler için derinleme araştırılması gereken önemli bir konudur. Bu makale; bu önemli konuya ışık tutmak için yazılmıştır. Birinci bölümde; beşeri sermaye ve kentsel gelişme arasındaki ilişkiyi araştıran literatüre sunulmaktadır. İkinci bölümde; beşeri sermaye göçünü açıklayıcı analizler sunulmaktadır. Üçüncü bölüm ise elde edilen kümeler ve yorumlarını içermektedir. Makale bu konunun ilerletilmesine yönelik bazı tespitler ile sonuçlandırılmaktadır.

Keywords

• Beşeri sermaye akımları,Kentsel gelişme,Kentsel dinamizm

PROVINCIAL HUMAN CAPITAL FLOWS AND URBAN DYNAMISM IN TURKEY

Abstract

Human capital is being argued as an urban development factor for many years. People who can think, create, change way of thinking easily according to fast evolving new situations, make innovations and produce innovative solutions are the bases of urban dynamism. In the world literature, after human capital has gained such an important role, many researches have been conducted in order to understand relationship between human capital flows and spatial development. However, in Turkish literature, mainly due to lack of detailed migration data, this kind of studies are not in sufficient number. In this study, it is aimed to cluster the most popular urban migration destinations according to their human capital immigration profiles by using some exploratory techniques and there are some surprising conclusions reached by these analysis in Turkey, like, although Istanbul is the outlier for almost all of the urban dynamism characteristics for Turkey, she is not lucky enough for gaining the most valuable urban migration profile. Besides; it is seen that there are opportunities to gain and benefit from this valuable profile by developing some policies on training, internship opportunities, creation of jobs for the ones which are not as popular migration destinations as Istanbul, like Kutahya, Erzurum, and Manisa. Therefore, human capital and its relation with space are very important issues for planning authorities and policy makers to dig up. This paper is written to shed light on this crucial issue. In the first part; literature on analyzing the relation between human capital and urban development is presented. In the second part, exploratory analysis of human capital migration is introduced. Third part includes the reached clusters and their interpretations. Paper ends with some concluding remarks pointing issues on further research on this subject.

Keywords

• Human capital flows,Urban development,Urban dynamism

References

1. [1] King R., (2002), “Towards a New Map of European Migration”, International Journal of Population Geography, 8, 89-106, doi: 101002/ijpg.246.
2. [2] Faggian, A., McCann, P., & Sheppard, S., (2007), Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: Gender differences in UK graduate migration behavior. Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 517–539. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00518.x
3. [3] Greenwood, M. J., (1975), Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(2), 397–433. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2722115
4. [4] Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A., (2011), Internal migration in the United States (Discussion Paper No. 5903). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
5. [5] Faggian A., Rajbhandari I., Dotzel K. R., (2017), The interregional migration of human capital and its regional consequences: a review, Regional Studies, 51:1, 128-143, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1263388
6. [6] DaVanzo, J., (1978), Does unemployment affect migration? Evidence from micro data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(4), 504– 514. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924242
7. [7] Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development, Human Development Report, (2009), United Nations Development Programme , New York, USA, ISBN 978-0-230-23904-3
8. [8] Boschma,R., Eriksson,R., & Lindgren, U., (2009), How doeslabour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 169–190. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn041

9. [9] Faggian A., McCann P., (2009), Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, p. 317-333.
10. [10] Boschma, R., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U., (2014), Labour market externalities and regional growth in Sweden: The importance of labour mobility between skill-related industries. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1669–1690. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013. 867429
11. [11] Jones, B. F., (2009).,The burden of knowledge and the ‘Death of the renaissance man’: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283–317. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X. 2008.00531.x
12. [12] McCann,P.,& Simonen, J., (2005), Innovation,knowledgespillovers and local labour markets. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 465– 485. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2005.00036.x
13. [13] Romer, P. M., (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. doi:10.1086/261420
14. [14] Romer, P. M., (1987), Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.
15. [15] Solow, R. M., (1957),Technicalchangeandtheaggregateproduction function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.
16. [16] Gezici, F. & Hewings, G. J. D., (2007), Spatial analysis of regional inequalities in Turkey, European Planning Studies, 15(3), pp. 383–403.
17. [17] Akgun, A. A., Baycan, T. & Nijkamp, P., (2010), Business dynamics as the source of counter-urbanization: An empirical analysis of Turkey, International Sustainable Development, 13(1/2), pp. 200–214.
18. [18] Hall P., (2006), Creative Cities and Economic Development, Urban Studies, 37.4, 639-649.
19. [19] Landry C., (2000). The Creative City-A Tool for Urban Innovators, Earthscan, London.
20. [20] Lever W. F., (2004). The knowledge base and the competitive city, in Urban Competitiveness-Policies for dynamic cities, edited by Begg I., Policy Press, Briston, UK.
21. [21] Faggian A., McCann P., (2006), Human Capital Flows and Regional Knowledge Assets: a Simultaneous Equation Approach, Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 475-500.
22. [22] Simmie J., Sennett J., Wood P., (2004). “Innovation and clustering in the London metropolitan region” in Urban Competitiveness-Policies for dynamic cities, edited by Begg I., Policy Press, Briston, UK.
23. [23] Coniglio N. D., Prota F., (2008), Human Capital Accumulation and Migration in a Peripheral EU Region: the case of Basilicata, Papers in Regional Science, 87.1, 77-95.
24. [24] Simmie J., Sennett J., Wood P., (2004), “Innovation and clustering in the London metropolitan region” in Urban Competitiveness-Policies for dynamic cities, edited by Begg I., Policy Press, Briston, UK.
25. [25] Stillwell J., (2008), ‘Interregional migration modeling: a review’, in Poot J., Waldorf B., and Van Wissen L. (eds.), Migration and Human Capital, New Horizons in Regional Science, Edward Elgar, USA.
26. [26] Sjaastad L. A., (1962), The Costs and Returns of Human Migration, Journal of Political Economy, V.70, No:5, Part 2, p. 80-93.
27. [27] Becker, G. S., (1962), “Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 70 (5:2), 9-45.
28. [28] Lucas, R. E., (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development." Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22: 3-42.
29. [29] Romer, P. M., (1990), Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98: S71-102.
30. [30] Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X., (1995), Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
31. [31] Rauch J. E., (1993), Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentrations of Human Capital: Evidence from Cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 34, 380-400.
32. [32] Simon C., Nardinelli C., (1996), The Talk of the Town: Human Capital, Information and the Growth of English Cities, 1861-1961, Explorations in Economic History, 33.3, 384-413.
33. [33] Simon C., (1998), Human Capital and Metropolitan Employment Growth, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 223-243.
34. [34] Glaeser, E., (1999), “Learning Cities”, Journal of Urban Economics, 46(2), 254-277.
35. [35] Glaeser E., (2000), The New Economics of Urban and Regional Growth, in G. Clark, M. Gertler, M. Feldman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook Economic Geography, pp. 83-98, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. [36] Mathur V. K., (1999), Human Capital-Based Strategy for Regional Economic Development, Economic Development Quarterly, 13.3, 203-216.
37. [37] Rodriguez-Pose A., Vialta-Bufi M., (2005), Education, Migration and Job Satisfaction: the Regional Returns of Human Capital in the European Union, J. Econ. Geogr., 5., 545-566.
38. [38] Ritsila J., Ovaskainen M., (2001), Migration and regional centralization of human capital, Applied Economics, 33, 317-325.
39. [39] Glendon S., (1998), Urban Life Cycles, unpublished working paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
40. [40] Krugman P., (1991), Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499.
41. [41] Coniglio N. D., (2003), Regional integration and migration: An economic geography with heterogeneous labor force, Glasgow University Department of Economics Discussion Paper series n.1.
42. [42] Armstrong H., Taylor J., (2000), Regional Economics and Policy- Third Edition, Blackwell Publishers LTD., UK (chapter 6 : interregional migration, p: 141-165).
43. [43] Jacobs J., (1984), Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.
44. [44] Florida R., (2003), Cities and the Creative Class, City & Community, 2.1, 3-19.
45. [45] Coniglio N. D., (2008), Human Capital Accumulation and Migration in a Peripheral EU Region: the case of Basilicata, Papers in Regional Science, 87.1, 77-95.
46. [46] Taymaz E. & Kiliçaslan Y., (2005), Determinants of subcontracting and regional development: An empirical study on Turkish textile and engineering industries, Regional Studies, 39:5, 633-645, DOI: 10.1080/00343400500151913.
47. [47] Turkish Statistical Institute Report, (2000), Migration