Conference Paper

Long Period Seismic Waves Developed at Local Distances

Volume: 4 Number: 1 July 5, 2018
EN

Long Period Seismic Waves Developed at Local Distances

Abstract

Long period seismic waves has two types. One of them is caused from far-source earthquakes and the other one is caused from near field type earthquakes. (Koketsu and Miyake, 2008)  Long period seismic waves could be really destructive since these kind of waves amplify their effect when they are passing through the sediman areas. There are many examples in literature. A devastating example is Mexico City, which is located 400 km away from the 1985 Michoacan Earthquake (Mw=8.0) (Celebi et al, 1987). This study’s aim is to detect the long period seismic waves which will effect Marmara Region and generate relationship according to path and source.  On May 24, 2014 Mw=6.9 Gökçeada earthquake was occurred and after this event, there were far source long period ground waves observed at Marmara Region. We used 5 stations to compare the wave characteristic. Gökçeada station is the closest station and 40 km away, the other 4 stations are 300 km away from the epicenter and they are located at near İstanbul. We observed long period seismic waves at these stations.  For future works, the aim is to make a long period ground waves map for Marmara Region especially for İstanbul, and calculate their effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Ambraseys, N. (2002). The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(1), 1-18.
  2. Bayrakci, G., Laigle, M., Bécel, A., Hirn, A., Taymaz, T., Yolsal-Cevikbilen, S., & Team, S. (2013). 3-D sediment-basement tomography of the Northern Marmara trough by a dense OBS network at the nodes of a grid of controlled source profiles along the North Anatolian fault. Geophysical Journal International, 194(3), 1335-1357.
  3. Beck, J. L., & Hall, J. F. (1986). Factors contributing to the catastrophe in Mexico City during the earthquake of September 19, 1985. Geophysical Research Letters, 13(6), 593-596.
  4. Celebi, M., Prince, J., Dietel, C., Onate, M., & Chavez, G. (1987). The culprit in Mexico City—amplification of motions. Earthquake spectra, 3(2), 315-328.
  5. Gurbuz, C., Aktar, M., Eyidogan, H., Cisternas, A., Haessler, H., Barka, A., Kuleli, S. (2000). The seismotectonics of the Marmara region (Turkey): results from a microseismic experiment. Tectonophysics, 316(1), 1-17.
  6. Koketsu, K., Hatayama, K., Furumura, T., Ikegami, Y., & Akiyama, S. (2005). Damaging long-period ground motions from the 2003 M w 8.3 Tokachi-oki, Japan earthquake. Seismological Research Letters, 76(1), 67-73.
  7. Koketsu, K., & Miyake, H. (2008). A seismological overview of long-period ground motion. Journal of Seismology, 2(12), 133-143.
  8. Okay, A. I., Kaşlılar-Özcan, A., Imren, C., Boztepe-Güney, A., Demirbağ, E., & Kuşçu, İ. (2000). Active faults and evolving strike-slip basins in the Marmara Sea, northwest Turkey: a multichannel seismic reflection study. Tectonophysics, 321(2), 189-218.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Authors

Esra Kalkan Ertan *
Boğazçi Üniversity Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Geopyhsics Departmet
Türkiye

Ali Pınar
Boğazçi Üniversity Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Earthquake Engineering Department
Türkiye

Ümit Dikmen This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 5, 2018

Submission Date

March 15, 2018

Acceptance Date

June 22, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 4 Number: 1

Chicago
Kalkan Ertan, Esra, Ali Pınar, and Ümit Dikmen. 2018. “Long Period Seismic Waves Developed at Local Distances”. Disaster Science and Engineering 4 (1): 40-45. https://izlik.org/JA78UK33FT.