Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

LEYDİ MARY WROTH’UN PAMPHILIA TO AMPHILANTUS ADLI ESERİNDE BİR KADIN ŞAİRİN PORTRESİ

Year 2023, , 332 - 356, 20.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2023.63.1.13

Abstract

Leydi Mary Wroth, Erken Modern Döneme damgasını vurmuş önemli bir yazardır. Ürettikleri önemli edebi eserler ile tanınan Sidney ailesinin fertlerinden biridir. Wroth’un Pamphilia to Amphilanthus başlıklı eseri “bir İngiliz kadın tarafından yazılan ilk sone dizisi” (Roberts, 1982, s. 43) olması nedeniyle sone geleneğinde ve erken modern dönem kadın yazınında oldukça önemli yere sahiptir. Erkeğin şair, kadınınsa idealize edilen kişi olarak rol aldığı, karşılıksız aşk ve tutkunun kalıplaşmış ifadelerle sunulduğu Petrarka şiir geleneğinde kadının alışılmamış bir role bürünerek şair olarak ortaya çıkması oldukça güçtü. Bu makale, bir kadın şairin sone geleneğini kendi özgün tarzıyla nasıl yorumladığını ve şekillendirdiğini görmek üzere Pamphilia to Amphilanthus adlı eseri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Wroth’un şair olarak kendisini ve alışılagelmişin dışında özelliklerle şekillendirdiği şiir kişisini dönemin şiir geleneğine nasıl yerleştirdiği tartışmanın ana noktasını oluşturacaktır. Bu bağlamda, eserde Pamphilia’nın temsili üzerinde önemle durulacaktır. Deneyimlerini ve üzüntünün neden olduğu yıkıcı sonuçları dile getiren, çoğu kez de aşkın doğasını sorgulayan sesi ile var olan bir kadındır Pamphilia. O, başka bir şairin eserindeki sessiz obje olmaktan öte, kendi şiirlerini yazan, edebiyat yazınında kadının yazar konumda da olabileceğini gösteren bir figür olarak yansıtılır. Tüm bunlara ek olarak, çalışmada Wroth’un edebi tür seçimi, bunu nasıl kullandığı ve değiştirdiği, şiir kişisinine verdiği roller, eserdeki ana temalar ve bir kadın şair olarak edebi eserler üretmek hakkındaki görüşleri de ayrıntılı olarak ele alınacaktır.

References

  • Beilinn, E. V. (1987). Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
  • Coch, C. (2004). An arbor of one's own? Aemilia Lanyer and the Early Modern Garden. Renaissance and Reformation, 28 (2), 97-118. Retrieved from https://www. jstor.org/stable/43445755
  • Fienberg, N. (1991). Mary Wroth and the Invention of Female Subjectivity. In N. J. Miller and G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Mary Wroth: Representing Alternatives in Early Modern England (pp. 175-190). Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
  • Freer, C. (1987). Countess of Pembroke, Mary Sidney. In K. M. Wilson (Ed.), Women Writers of the Renaissance and Reformation (pp. 481-521). Athens: The U of Georgia P. Hamilton, E. (1969). Mythology: Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes. New York: Mentor.
  • Hannay, M. P. (1990). Philip’s Phoenix: Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke. New York, Oxford UP.
  • Jones, A. R. (1990). The Currency of Eros: Women’s Love Lyric in Europe, 1540-1620. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Kelly-Gadol, J. (1987). Did Women Have a Renaissance? In R. Bridenthal, C. Koonz and S. Stuard (Eds.), Becoming Visible: Women in European History (175-201). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Lamb, M. E. (1990). Gender and Authorship in the Sidney Circle. Wisconsin: The U of Wisconsin Press.
  • Masten, J. (1991). “Shall I turne blabb?”: Circulation, Gender, and Subjectivity in Mary Wroth’s Sonnets. In N. J. Miller and G. Waller (Eds), Reading Mary Wroth: Representing Alternatives in Early Modern England (pp. 67-87), Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
  • Marotti, A. F. (1982). “Love is Not Love”: Elizabethan Sonnet Sequences and the Social Order. ELH, 49(2), 396-428. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2872989 Mermin, D. (1990). Women Becoming Poets: Katherine Philips, Aphra Behn, Anne Finch. ELH, 57 (2), 335-355.
  • Miller, N. J. (1996). Changing the Subject: Mary Wroth and Figurations of Gender in Early Modern England. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
  • Miller, N. J. (1990). Rewriting Lyric Fictions: The Role of the Lady in Lady Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In A. M. Haselkorn and B. S. Travitsky (Eds.), The Renaissance Englishwoman in Print: Counterbalancing the Canon (pp. 295-310). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Miller, N. K. (1986). Arachnologies: The Woman, The Text, and the Critic. In N. K. Miller (Ed.), The Poetics of Gender (pp. 270-295). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • O’Hara, S. L. (2011). The Theatricality of Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus: Unmasking Conventions in Context. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.
  • Payne, P. H. (1999). Finding a Poetic Voice of Her Own: Lady Mary Wroth’s Urania and Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In S. King (Ed.), Pilgrimage for Love: Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honour of Josephine A. Roberts (pp. 209-220). Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
  • Roberts, J. A. (1983). The Poems of Lady Mary Wroth. J. A. Roberts (Ed., Int. and Notes). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP.
  • Roberts, J. A. (1982). The Biographical Problem of Pamphilia to Amphilantus. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 1 (1), 43-53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor. org/stable/464091
  • Roberts, J. A. (1970). Lady Mary Wroth’s Sonnets: A Labyrinth of the Mind.” Journal of Women’s Studies in Literature, 1, 319-329.
  • Salvaggio, R. (1998). Anne Finch Placed and Displaced. In A. Pecheco (Ed. and Int.), Early Women Writers: 1600-1700 (pp. 242-265). London: Longman. Sidney, Sir P. (1990). Sir Philip Sidney. K. Duncan-Jones (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Simon, M. (2016). Mary Wroth’s Ephemeral Epitaph. Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 56 (1), 45-69. Retrieved from http: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/ 611543
  • Seber, H. (2014). Elizabeth Çağı Şiir Geleneğinde “Soylu ve Güzel Leydi”: Pembroke Kontesi Mary Sidney Herbert. A. D. Bozer (Ed.), Ortaçağdan On Yedinci Yüzyıla İngiliz Kadın Yazarlar (ss. 107-131) içinde. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Villeponteaux, M. (1999). Poetry’s Birth: The Maternal Subtext of Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In S. King (Ed.), Pilgrimage for Love: Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honour of Josephine A. Roberts (pp. 163-175). Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
  • Walker, K. (1996). Women Writers of the English Renaissance. New York: Twayne.
  • Waller, G. (1993). The Sidney Family Romance: Mary Wroth, William Herbert and the Early Modern Construction of Gender. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
  • Watkins, L. (2015). The Poetics of Consolation and Community in Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. Studies in Philology, 112 (1), 139-161. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/566613
  • Wroth, Lady M. (1983). The Poems of Lady Mary Wroth. J. A. Roberts (Ed. and Int.). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP.

THE PORTRAIT OF A WOMAN POET IN LADY MARY WROTH’S PAMPHILIA TO AMPHILANTUS

Year 2023, , 332 - 356, 20.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2023.63.1.13

Abstract

Lady Mary Wroth is considered to be one of the most prominent women writers of the Early Modern Period. She comes from the Sidney family, the members of which are well-known with their noteworthy literary accomplishments. Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilanthus has a significant place among the sonnet sequences and early modern women’s poetry as it is “the first sonnet sequence to be composed by an Englishwomen” (Roberts, 1982, p. 43). The Petrarchan tradition with its determined roles of a male poet and an idealized lady, along with its blazons employed to express the consequences of unfulfilled love and desire can hardy accommodate a woman who comes up with such an unaccustomed role. This article, therefore, aims at a study of Pamphilia to Amphilanthus, as a sonnet sequence to see how a woman poet manages to employ the sonnet tradition in her own way. How Wroth as a woman poet accommodated herself and her persona to the poetic tradition of the time will be the main point of argumentation. It is in this respect that, the focus will be on Pamphilia and how she is represented with a new role. She is depicted as a woman with a voice, talking about her experience and the destructive outcomes of grief, quite often questioning the nature of love. Pamphilia appears not as the silent object of some other poet’s work, but writing her own poems, metaphorically redefining her place in the literary production. Furthermore, Wroth’s choice of genre, how she employed and revised it, the role she assigned to the female speaker, the major themes, along with her ideas on writing as a woman poet will be further elaborated on.

References

  • Beilinn, E. V. (1987). Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
  • Coch, C. (2004). An arbor of one's own? Aemilia Lanyer and the Early Modern Garden. Renaissance and Reformation, 28 (2), 97-118. Retrieved from https://www. jstor.org/stable/43445755
  • Fienberg, N. (1991). Mary Wroth and the Invention of Female Subjectivity. In N. J. Miller and G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Mary Wroth: Representing Alternatives in Early Modern England (pp. 175-190). Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
  • Freer, C. (1987). Countess of Pembroke, Mary Sidney. In K. M. Wilson (Ed.), Women Writers of the Renaissance and Reformation (pp. 481-521). Athens: The U of Georgia P. Hamilton, E. (1969). Mythology: Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes. New York: Mentor.
  • Hannay, M. P. (1990). Philip’s Phoenix: Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke. New York, Oxford UP.
  • Jones, A. R. (1990). The Currency of Eros: Women’s Love Lyric in Europe, 1540-1620. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Kelly-Gadol, J. (1987). Did Women Have a Renaissance? In R. Bridenthal, C. Koonz and S. Stuard (Eds.), Becoming Visible: Women in European History (175-201). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Lamb, M. E. (1990). Gender and Authorship in the Sidney Circle. Wisconsin: The U of Wisconsin Press.
  • Masten, J. (1991). “Shall I turne blabb?”: Circulation, Gender, and Subjectivity in Mary Wroth’s Sonnets. In N. J. Miller and G. Waller (Eds), Reading Mary Wroth: Representing Alternatives in Early Modern England (pp. 67-87), Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
  • Marotti, A. F. (1982). “Love is Not Love”: Elizabethan Sonnet Sequences and the Social Order. ELH, 49(2), 396-428. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2872989 Mermin, D. (1990). Women Becoming Poets: Katherine Philips, Aphra Behn, Anne Finch. ELH, 57 (2), 335-355.
  • Miller, N. J. (1996). Changing the Subject: Mary Wroth and Figurations of Gender in Early Modern England. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
  • Miller, N. J. (1990). Rewriting Lyric Fictions: The Role of the Lady in Lady Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In A. M. Haselkorn and B. S. Travitsky (Eds.), The Renaissance Englishwoman in Print: Counterbalancing the Canon (pp. 295-310). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Miller, N. K. (1986). Arachnologies: The Woman, The Text, and the Critic. In N. K. Miller (Ed.), The Poetics of Gender (pp. 270-295). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • O’Hara, S. L. (2011). The Theatricality of Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus: Unmasking Conventions in Context. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.
  • Payne, P. H. (1999). Finding a Poetic Voice of Her Own: Lady Mary Wroth’s Urania and Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In S. King (Ed.), Pilgrimage for Love: Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honour of Josephine A. Roberts (pp. 209-220). Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
  • Roberts, J. A. (1983). The Poems of Lady Mary Wroth. J. A. Roberts (Ed., Int. and Notes). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP.
  • Roberts, J. A. (1982). The Biographical Problem of Pamphilia to Amphilantus. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 1 (1), 43-53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor. org/stable/464091
  • Roberts, J. A. (1970). Lady Mary Wroth’s Sonnets: A Labyrinth of the Mind.” Journal of Women’s Studies in Literature, 1, 319-329.
  • Salvaggio, R. (1998). Anne Finch Placed and Displaced. In A. Pecheco (Ed. and Int.), Early Women Writers: 1600-1700 (pp. 242-265). London: Longman. Sidney, Sir P. (1990). Sir Philip Sidney. K. Duncan-Jones (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Simon, M. (2016). Mary Wroth’s Ephemeral Epitaph. Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 56 (1), 45-69. Retrieved from http: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/ 611543
  • Seber, H. (2014). Elizabeth Çağı Şiir Geleneğinde “Soylu ve Güzel Leydi”: Pembroke Kontesi Mary Sidney Herbert. A. D. Bozer (Ed.), Ortaçağdan On Yedinci Yüzyıla İngiliz Kadın Yazarlar (ss. 107-131) içinde. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Villeponteaux, M. (1999). Poetry’s Birth: The Maternal Subtext of Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. In S. King (Ed.), Pilgrimage for Love: Essays in Early Modern Literature in Honour of Josephine A. Roberts (pp. 163-175). Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
  • Walker, K. (1996). Women Writers of the English Renaissance. New York: Twayne.
  • Waller, G. (1993). The Sidney Family Romance: Mary Wroth, William Herbert and the Early Modern Construction of Gender. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
  • Watkins, L. (2015). The Poetics of Consolation and Community in Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilantus. Studies in Philology, 112 (1), 139-161. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/566613
  • Wroth, Lady M. (1983). The Poems of Lady Mary Wroth. J. A. Roberts (Ed. and Int.). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Creative Arts and Writing
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hande Seber

Early Pub Date June 10, 2023
Publication Date June 20, 2023
Submission Date November 4, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Seber, H. (2023). THE PORTRAIT OF A WOMAN POET IN LADY MARY WROTH’S PAMPHILIA TO AMPHILANTUS. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 63(1), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2023.63.1.13

Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi - dtcfdergisi@ankara.edu.tr

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.   22455