BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2003, Volume: 43 Issue: 1, 127 - 155, 01.01.2003

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Mary Shelley'nin Frankenstein adlı yapıtında işlenen benlik, beden/madde, yaratı ve canavarlık tema ve kavramlarını incelemektir. Çalışma konuya özellikle cinsel kimliğe odaklanan, ağırlıklı olarak postmodern bir bakış açısıyla yaklaşır. Cinsel kimlik, romanda yalnızca örtük bir tema olmasına karşın romanın merkezindeki derin anlamların ortaya çıkarılmasında önemli bir rol oynar ve romanın dokusuna çok katmanlı bir biçimde örülmüştür. Bu örtük sorunsal romanda 1 Paradise Lost'un "yeniden yazılması" ve yaratılış miti, Prometheus miti gibi kültürel açıdan büyük önem taşıyan mitlerin Romantik bir versiyonu olarak, öz benlik ve yaratıcılıkla ilgili Romantik kavramların örtük bir sorgulanması biçiminde; 2 Godwin'in akılcılığı, bilimin iyicilliğine olan Aydınlanma Çağı inancı, Rousseau'nun Romantizmi gibi "uygar" insanın doğayla, toplumla ve kendisiyle ilişkisini irdeleyen kültürel ve düşünsel söylemlerle ilişkili olarak; 3 18. ve 19. yüzyıl orta sınıf egemenliğinin en önemli kültürel temellerinden birini oluşturan domestik ideolojiyle ilintili olarak; 4 Shelley'nin ailevi geçmişinin ve sanatsal benliğiyle ilişkili olarak cinsel roller bağlamında yaşadığı belirsizliğin biçimlendirdiği örtük otobiyografik öğeler biçiminde; 5 kadının toplumsal/kültürel bakımdan marjinalleştirilmesini yansıtacak biçimde kadın karakterlerin anlatıda marjinal bir konuma yerleştirilmesinde anlatım bulur.

References

  • Baldick, Chris. (1987). In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and 19th-century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Behrendt, Stephen. (1998). "Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Woman Writer's Fate." Critical Essays on M. Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Botting, Fred, (1991). Making Monstrous: Frankenstein, criticism, theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Bronfen, Elisabeth. (1994). "Rewriting the Family: Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' in its Biographical/Textual Context." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Gilbert, Sandra M. & Gubar, Susan. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-century Literary Imagination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Godwin, William. (1993). An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Ed. Mark Philp. London: William Pickering. Vol. 3 of Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin.
  • Homans, Margaret. (1986). "Bearing Demons: Frankenstein's Circumvention of the Maternal." Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women's Writing. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Jackson, Rosemary. (1981). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge.
  • James, Louis. (1994). "Frankenstein's Monster in Two Traditions." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Johnson, Barbara. (1987). "My Monster / My Self." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Jordanova, Ludmilla. (1994). "Melancholy Reflection: Constructing an Identity for Unveilers of Nature." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Levine, George. (1981). "The Pattern: Frankenstein and Austen to Conrad." The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • -. (1998). "The Ambiguous Heritage of Frankenstein" Critical Essays on Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • McLane, Maureen Noelle. (1996). "Literate Species: Populations, 'Humanities,' and Frankenstein' English Literary History, vol. 63, 959-988.
  • Mellor, Anne K. (1998). "A Feminist Critique of Science." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Moi, Toril. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Oates, Joyce Carol. (1987). "Frankenstein's Fallen Angel." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • O'Rourke, James. (1989). " 'Nothing More Unnatural': Mary Shelley's Revision of Rousseau." English Literary History, vol. 56, 543-569.
  • Poovey, Mary. (1987). '"My Hedious Progeny': The Lady and the Monster."
  • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Shelley, Mary. (1994). Frankenstein. Republication of the text of the third edition of 1831. New York: Dover.
  • Sherwin, Paul. (1987). "Frankenstein: Creation as Catastrophe." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Thornburg, Mary K. (1987). The Monster in the Mirror: Gender and the Sentimental/Gothic myth in Frankenstein. Ann Arbor, Michigan: U.M.I Research Press.
  • Wittman, Ellen H. (1998). "Mary Shelley's Daemon." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Wordsworth, William. (1971). Poetical Works. Ed. Thomas Hutchinson, revised Ernest de Selincourt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frankenstein: Ego, Body, Creation and Monstrosity

Year 2003, Volume: 43 Issue: 1, 127 - 155, 01.01.2003

Abstract

This study aims to explore the themes and concepts of self, body, creation and monstrosity inscribed in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. it will approach these issues from a mainly posmodern point of view that takes gender as its central focus. Although gender is not an explicit theme in the novel, it plays an enormous part in ehıcidating the deeper meanings embedded at its heart, and is woven into its fabric in a multi-layered manner that can be roughly summarized as follows: 1 as a rewriting of Paradise Lost as a masculinist text and as a Romantic version of culturally central mytlıs such as the creation myth and the Promethean myth in ways that covertly question Romantic notions of şelf and creativity; 2 in connection with some of the most influential cultural and philosophical discourses of Shelley's time such as Godwinian rationalism, the Enlightenment belief in the beneficience of selence and human progress and Rousseau 's Romanticism, ali of which deal with "civilized" man's relationship to nature, to society and to himself; 3 in relation to the domestic ideology that constituted a major cultural basis of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century middle-class domination; 4 as an inseription of crucial aspects of Shelley's own life such as parental loss and ambivalence about her gender role in relation to her artistle self; 5 through the narrative marginalization of the female characters refleeting the sodalı'cultural marginalization of woman.

References

  • Baldick, Chris. (1987). In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and 19th-century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Behrendt, Stephen. (1998). "Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Woman Writer's Fate." Critical Essays on M. Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Botting, Fred, (1991). Making Monstrous: Frankenstein, criticism, theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Bronfen, Elisabeth. (1994). "Rewriting the Family: Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' in its Biographical/Textual Context." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Gilbert, Sandra M. & Gubar, Susan. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-century Literary Imagination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Godwin, William. (1993). An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. Ed. Mark Philp. London: William Pickering. Vol. 3 of Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin.
  • Homans, Margaret. (1986). "Bearing Demons: Frankenstein's Circumvention of the Maternal." Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women's Writing. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Jackson, Rosemary. (1981). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Routledge.
  • James, Louis. (1994). "Frankenstein's Monster in Two Traditions." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Johnson, Barbara. (1987). "My Monster / My Self." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Jordanova, Ludmilla. (1994). "Melancholy Reflection: Constructing an Identity for Unveilers of Nature." Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity. Ed. Stephen Bann. London: Reaktion.
  • Levine, George. (1981). "The Pattern: Frankenstein and Austen to Conrad." The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • -. (1998). "The Ambiguous Heritage of Frankenstein" Critical Essays on Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • McLane, Maureen Noelle. (1996). "Literate Species: Populations, 'Humanities,' and Frankenstein' English Literary History, vol. 63, 959-988.
  • Mellor, Anne K. (1998). "A Feminist Critique of Science." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Moi, Toril. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Oates, Joyce Carol. (1987). "Frankenstein's Fallen Angel." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • O'Rourke, James. (1989). " 'Nothing More Unnatural': Mary Shelley's Revision of Rousseau." English Literary History, vol. 56, 543-569.
  • Poovey, Mary. (1987). '"My Hedious Progeny': The Lady and the Monster."
  • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Shelley, Mary. (1994). Frankenstein. Republication of the text of the third edition of 1831. New York: Dover.
  • Sherwin, Paul. (1987). "Frankenstein: Creation as Catastrophe." Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York, New Haven, Philadelphia: Chelsea House.
  • Thornburg, Mary K. (1987). The Monster in the Mirror: Gender and the Sentimental/Gothic myth in Frankenstein. Ann Arbor, Michigan: U.M.I Research Press.
  • Wittman, Ellen H. (1998). "Mary Shelley's Daemon." Critical Essays on Mary Woilstone craft Shelley. Ed. Mary Lowe-Evans. New York: G. K. Hall.
  • Wordsworth, William. (1971). Poetical Works. Ed. Thomas Hutchinson, revised Ernest de Selincourt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Erinç Özdemir This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2003
Published in Issue Year 2003 Volume: 43 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özdemir, E. (2003). Frankenstein: Ego, Body, Creation and Monstrosity. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(1), 127-155.

Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography

This journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License22455