TÜRKİYE'DE BİLGİ YOĞUN İŞ HİZMETLERİNİN BYİH BÖLGESEL UZMANLAŞMA ÖRÜNTÜSÜ

Year 2018, Volume: 58 Issue: 2, 1492 - 1521, 01.01.2018

Mehmet Tahsin Şahin Mutlu Yılmaz Çiğdem Varol

Abstract

Bilgi Yoğun İş Hizmetleri BYİH , ekonomik kalkınma ve yenilikçiliğinin önemli itici gücü olarak algılanmaktadır. BYİH genel olarak, ekonomik güç, bilgi üretimi ve bilgi transferi ile ilgili olarak bölgesel ve ulusal ölçekte kalkınmanın en önemli alanlarından biridir ve bu nedenle BYİH'nin coğrafi yoğunluğunun bölgeler açısından kritik bir faktör olması beklenmektedir. Bu makale, bilgi-yoğun iş hizmetleri faaliyetleri kavramını tanıtmayı ve bölgesel kalkınmada BYİH'nin rolünü, özellikle bölgesel uzmanlaşma açısından incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla detaylı sektör verilerinden yararlanılmıştır. BYİH faaliyetleri üretici hizmetlerin bir alt dalı olarak görülmekte ve 10 alt sektörde tanımlanmaktadır. Bu 10 alt sektör, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu TÜİK 'ndan alınan 2009 ve 2015 yıllarına ait işyeri ve istihdam sayısı ile ciro verilerine göre analiz edilmektedir. Bu analizler Türkiye'deki 26 adet Düzey-2 bölgesi üzerinden yapılmıştır. Analiz için yerelleşme katsayısı LQ tekniği kullanılmaktadır. Sonuçlar, telekomünikasyon sektörü dışında tüm BYİH sektörlerinin büyük şehirlerde uzmanlaştığını göstermektedir. BYİH'nin bölgesel uzmanlaşma örüntüsünü ortaya koymak, bölgesel planlara ve politika yapıcılara yol göstermesi açısından önem taşımaktadır.

Keywords

Bilgi Yoğun İş Hizmetleri (BYİH), Yerelleşme Katsayısı (LQ), Bölgesel Uzmanlaşma Örüntüsü

REGIONAL SPECIALIZATION PATTERN OF KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES KIBS IN TURKEY

Abstract

Knowledge Intensive Business Services KIBS are perceived as important drives of economic development and innovation. In general, KIBS are one of the most important activities of regional and national scale development in terms of economic power, knowledge production and knowledge transfer and therefore, geographical density of KIBS are expected to be a critical factor for regions. The paper seeks to introduce the concept of knowledge-intensive business services KIBS and to analyze the role of KIBS in regional development, especially from the viewpoint of regional specialization. For this purpose, detailed sector data have been used. Knowledge-intensive business services are subordinate to producer services and are defined in 10 sub-sectors. These 10 sub-sectors have been analyzed for 26 NUTS-2 regions of Turkey, based on the number of workplace and employment, and giro data of the years of 2009 and 2015 received from Turkey Statistics Institution. The location quotient LQ technique has been used in the analysis. The results show that all KIBS sectors, except the telecommunication sector, have been specialized in metropolitan cities. Explaining the regional specialization pattern of the KIBS is very important for offering guidance to regional plans and policy makers.

Keywords

Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS), Location Quotient (LQ), Regional Specialization Pattern

References

• Begg, Iain. “The Service Sector in Regional Development.” Regional Studies 27.8 (1993): 817-825.
• Bryson, John R. ve Peter W. Daniels. “Worlds of Services From Local Service Economies to Offshoring or Global Sourcing.” The Handbook of Service Industries. Ed. John R. Bryson ve Peter W. Daniels. 2007: 1-16. Elgaronline. Web. 15 Mart 2018.
• Cansız, Mehmet. 2023'e Doğru Türkiye Teknoparkları. Ankara: Kalkınma Bakanlığı, 2017.
• Coffey, William J. “The Geographies of Producer Services.” Urban Geography 21.2 (2000): 170-183.
• Coffey, William J. ve Antoine S. Bailly. “Producer Services and Flexible Production: An Exploratory Analysis.” Growth and Change 22.4 (1991): 95-117.
• Coffey, William J. ve Richard G. Shearmur. “The Growth and Location of High-Order Services in the Canadian Urban System, 1971-1991.” Professional Geographer 49.4 (1997): 404-418.
• Cohen, Stephen ve John Zysman. Manufacturing Matters: the Myth of the Post- Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
• Cooke, Philip ve Loet Leydesdorff. “Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31.1 (2005): 5-15.
• Çubukçu, Mert K. Planlamada Klâsik Sayısal Yöntemler. Ankara: ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı, 2008.
• Doloreux, David ve Richard Shearmur. “Collaboration, Information and The Geography of Innovation in Knowledge Intensive Business Services.” Journal of Economic Geography 12.1 (2012): 79-105. Web. 15 Mart 2018.
• Gallego, Jorge ve Andres Maroto. “The Specialization in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) across Europe: Permanent Co-Localization to Debate.” Regional Studies 49.4 (2015): 644-664.
• Goe, W. Richard. “The Producer Services Sector And Development Within The Deindustrializing Urban Community.” Social Forces 72 (1994): 971-1009.
• Hayter, Roger ve Jerry Patchell. Economic Geography: An Institutional Approach. Canada: Oxford University Press, 2011.
• Hill, T. Peter. “On Goods and Services.” Review of Income and Wealth 23.4 (1977): 315-338.
• Illeris, Sven. “Services and Regional Development.” Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis 1(1) (2009): 3-15.
• --. “The Role of Services in Regional and Urban Development: A Reappraisal of Our Understanding.” The Service Industries Journal 25.4 (2005): 447-460.
• --. The Service Economy: A Geographical Approach. New York: J. Wiley, 1996.
• Kay, David L., James E. Pratt ve Mildred E. Warner. “Role of Services in Regional Economy Growth.” Growth and Change 38.3 (2007): 419-442.
• Kaygalak, İrfan. “Türkiye Sanayi Coğrafyasında Endüstriyel Kümelenme ve Bölgesel Yoğunlaşma Eğilimi.” Beşeri Coğrafya Dergisi 1.1 (2013): 67-81.
• Koch, Andreas ve Thomas Stahlecker. “Regional Innovation Systems and The Foundation of Knowledge Intensive Business Services. A Comparative Study in Bremen, Munich, And Stuttgart, Germany.” European Planning Studies 14.2 (2006):123-145.
• MacKinnon, Danny ve Andrew Cumbers. An Introduction to Economic Geography: Globalization, Uneven Development and Place. Londra: Prentice Hall 2007.
• MacPherson, Alan. “The Role of Producer Service Outsourcing in the Innovation Performance of New York State Manufacturing Firms.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87.1 (1997): 52-71.
• Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcour, 2012.
• Moyart, Laurence. “The Role of Producer Services in Regional Development: What Opportunities for Medium-Sized Cities in Belgium?” The Service Industries Journal 25.2 (2005): 213-228.
• OECD. High-Tech Industry and Knowledge-Intensive Services. Web. 18 Mart 2018.
• Serrano, Romero De Avila V. Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in Los Angeles: Patterns, Interpretation, Consequences. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of California, 2014.
• Sombart, Werner. “Der Begriff der Stadt und das Wesen der Stadtebildung.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 25 (1907): 1-9.
• Strambach, Simone. “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) As Drivers of Multilevel Knowledge Dynamics.” International Journal of Services Technology and Management 10 (2008): 152-174.
• Stutz, Frederick P. ve Barney War. The World Economy: Geography, Business, Development. 6. ed. United States: Prentice Hall, 2012.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). İstatistik Göstergeler 1923-2013. 2016.
• Varol, Çiğdem ve diğerleri. Yenilikçilik ve Mekân: Ankara'daki Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri. Ankara: TMMOB Makine Mühendisleri Odası, 2011.
• Wang, Enru. “The Service Sector in the Chinese Economy: A Geographic Appraisal.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 50.3 (2009): 275-300.
• Williams, Colin C. Consumer Services and Economic Development. London: Routledge, 1997.
• Yang, Fiona F. ve Anthony G.O. Yeh. “Spatial Development of Producer Services in the Chinese Urban System.” Environment and Planning A 45.1 (2013): 159-179
• Ženka, Jan ve diğerleri. “Spatial Distribution of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in a Small Post-Communist Economy.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8.2 (2017): 385-406.
• Zhang, Cui. “Agglomeration of Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Productivity.” Papers in Regional Science 95.4 (2016): 801-818.