Analysis Of Pathology Results Of Our Apendectomy Cases

Year 2016, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 0 - 0, 01.12.2016

Sam Doğan Mehmet Fuat Çetin

https://izlik.org/JA67UT89AB

Abstract

Objective: In this study we aimed to evaluate the results of pathology that patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy with suspected appendicitis from August 2012 to August 2014. Material and Method: In this study data from 131 patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy between August 2012 and August 2014 in Van Training and Research Hospital were examined retrospectively for demographic characteristics. Results: In the laparoscopic appendectomy group handmade endoloop technique was used for closing the base of the appendix. Mc Burney’s incision was used for open appendectomy. 47% of patients was female (n=61), 53% of patients were male (n=69). The average age of the patients was 27.7 years. According to surgical technique, open appendectomy was performed 15% (n=20), laparoscopic appendectomy was performed 85% (n=110). Postoperative drainage tube was put to 15% of patients (n=20). Wound infection was seen in 4 open appendectomy performed patients (20%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 days vs 2.8 days). When the pathology results are analyzed, 2 malignancies are revealed (1,5%), 1 carcinoid tumor, 1 neuroendocrine tumor. After pathology results hemicolectomy was performed. Conclusion: Appendectomy is the most frequently performed surgery, even if macroscopic pathology is not present the risk of malignancy can not be underestimated

Keywords

Acute appendicitis , appendix tumors , appendectomy

APENDEKTOMİ OLGULARIMIZIN PATOLOJİ SONUÇLARI AÇISINDAN İRDELENMESİ

https://izlik.org/JA67UT89AB

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amacımız Ağustos 2012- Ağustos 2014 tarihleri arasında akut apandisittanısıyla laparoskopik ve açık teknikle apendektomi yapılan olguların patoloji sonuçlarıaçısından irdelenmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada Ağustos 2012 ve Ağustos 2014 tarihleri arasında Van EğitimAraştırma Hastanesinde akut apandisit ön tanısı ile opere olan 130 hastanın verileri demografiközellikleri, patoloji sonuçları açısından retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Hastaların %47’ si bayan (n=61), %53’ü erkekti (n=69). Hastaların yaş ortalaması27,7 yıl idi. Cerrahi teknik olarak %15 açık apendektomi (n=20), %85 laparoskopik apendektomi(n=110) yapıldı. Hastaların %15’ine postop dren konulmuştur (n=20). Yara yeri enfeksiyonuaçık apendektomi yapılan 4 olguda görülmüştür (%20). Laparoskopik apendektomi yapılanhasta grubunda açık apendektomi yapılanlara göre hastanede ortalama kalış süresi daha kısabulundu (2,2 gün, 2,8 gün). Patoloji sonuçları incelendiğinde 1 adet karsinoid tümör, 1 adetnöroendokrin tümör olmak üzere 2 hastada malignite saptandı (%1,5). İki hastaya dalaparoskopik apendektomi sonrası tanı konulmuş olup patoloji sonucu sonrası sağhemikolektomi yapılmıştır.Sonuç: Apendektomi en sık yapılan ameliyatlardan olup makroskopik olarak patolojidüşünülmese bile malignite riski azımsanamayacak derecede mevcuttur

Keywords

Akut apandisit , appendiks tümörleri , apendektomi

References

• Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandonà P, Mantoan D, et al. Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2353-9.
• Suh YJ, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Park JG, Kang SB, Kim DW, et al. Comparison of surgical-site infection between open and laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 2012; 82: 35-9.
• Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, et al. Does Laparoscopic Appendectomy Impart an Advantage over Open Appendectomy in Elderly Patients? World J Surg 2012; 36: 1534-9.
• Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 334-337.
• Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1174- 1180.
• Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS 2007; 11: 363-7.
• Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S. Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 374-7.
• Tan-Tam C, Yorke E, Wasdell M, Barcan C, Konkin D, Blair P. The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomies in obese patients. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 609-12.
• Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J 2010;16(1):12- 7.
• Bucher P, Mathe Z, Demirag A, Morel P. Appendix tumors in the era of laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18(7):1063-6.
• Spallitta SI, Termine G, Stella M, Calistro V, Marozzi P. Carcinoid of theappendix. A casereport. MinervaChir 2000;55:77-87.
• Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41(1):75-80.
• Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003;97:934-959.