Research Article

Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

Volume: 23 Number: 1 April 30, 2021
EN TR

Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

Abstract

Aim: Tunneled hemodialysis catheters are frequently used for hemodialysis patients and provide temporary venous access. However, it causes complications such as catheter-related infection, pneumothorax and hematoma. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the infections, complications and catheter patency rates that developed after the use of tunnel catheters connected to three different access routes. Material and Methods: A total of 145 patients who underwent hemodialysis due to chronic renal failure and who were placed on permanent hemodialysis catheter were included. In this study, jugular vein route was used as the first choice for the dialysis access route, when other access routes were needed due to complications and infection, femoral vein route was the second choice, while subclavian vein route was the third choice. Results: The femoral vein group had the highest infection rate and the lowest patency rate (both p<0.001). The infection rate at the end of one year was 65.3%, 95.6%, and 64.0% for the jugular vein, femoral vein and subclavian vein, respectively. At the end of one year, patency rates for the jugular vein, subclavian vein and femoral vein were 57.3%, 6.7%, and 32.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Although the jugular vein is the first choice for venous entry in hemodialysis patients, femoral and subclavian veins are also used. In this study, the jugular vein was the best option in terms of patency rate and infection. The femoral vein, on the other hand, had the worst patency rate and was also the access route with the highest infection rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Kramer A, Stel V, Zoccali C, Heaf J, Ansell D, Grönhagen-Riska C, et al. An update on renal replacement therapy in Europe: ERA-EDTA Registry data from 1997 to 2006. Neprol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(12):3557-66.
  2. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Guideline 7. Prevention and treatment of catheter and port complications. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(Suppl 1):S248-73.
  3. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, Shenoy S, Yevzlin AS, Abreo K, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164.
  4. Funaki B. Central venous access: A primer for the diagnostic radiologist. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):309-18.
  5. Swartz RD, Messana JM, Boyer CJ, Lunde NM, Weitzel WF, Hartman TL. Successful use of cuffed central venous hemodialysis catheters inserted percutaneously. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4(9):1719-25.
  6. Marr KA, Sexton DJ, Conlon PJ, Corey GR, Schwab SJ, Kirkland KB. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(4):275-80.
  7. Adar R, Mozes M. Fatal complications of central venous catheters. Br Med J. 1971;3(5777):746.
  8. Allon M, Brouwer-Maier DJ, Abreo K, Baskin KM, Bregel K, Chand DH, et al. Recommended clinical trial endpoints for dialysis catheters. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(3):495-500.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 30, 2021

Submission Date

January 26, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 22, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 23 Number: 1

APA
Ecevıt, A., Karaca, O. G., Kalender, M., & Darçın, O. T. (2021). Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Duzce Medical Journal, 23(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.869083
AMA
1.Ecevıt A, Karaca OG, Kalender M, Darçın OT. Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Duzce Med J. 2021;23(1):55-60. doi:10.18678/dtfd.869083
Chicago
Ecevıt, Ata, Okay Güven Karaca, Mehmet Kalender, and Osman Tansel Darçın. 2021. “Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters”. Duzce Medical Journal 23 (1): 55-60. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.869083.
EndNote
Ecevıt A, Karaca OG, Kalender M, Darçın OT (April 1, 2021) Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Duzce Medical Journal 23 1 55–60.
IEEE
[1]A. Ecevıt, O. G. Karaca, M. Kalender, and O. T. Darçın, “Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters”, Duzce Med J, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 55–60, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.18678/dtfd.869083.
ISNAD
Ecevıt, Ata - Karaca, Okay Güven - Kalender, Mehmet - Darçın, Osman Tansel. “Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters”. Duzce Medical Journal 23/1 (April 1, 2021): 55-60. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.869083.
JAMA
1.Ecevıt A, Karaca OG, Kalender M, Darçın OT. Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Duzce Med J. 2021;23:55–60.
MLA
Ecevıt, Ata, et al. “Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters”. Duzce Medical Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, Apr. 2021, pp. 55-60, doi:10.18678/dtfd.869083.
Vancouver
1.Ata Ecevıt, Okay Güven Karaca, Mehmet Kalender, Osman Tansel Darçın. Infection Rate of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Duzce Med J. 2021 Apr. 1;23(1):55-60. doi:10.18678/dtfd.869083

Cited By