The Effect of Different Phosphorus Doses on Forage Yield and Related Traits in Some Hungarian Vetch Cultivars

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 13 - 26, 10.06.2025

Berat Şenyiğit , Mehmet Salih Sayar

https://doi.org/10.55007/dufed.1603389

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effect of different levels of phosphorus on the forage yield and yield traits of some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) culitvars. The experiment was set up using a Split Plot Experimental Design in Randomized Blocks with three replications in the Research Area of Dicle University Bismil Vocational School. The analysis indicated that phosphorus doses had a statistically significant impact (P<0.05) on some important traits. Due to the effect of the phosphorus doses, the examined traits displayed values within the following ranges: days to flowering (153.3-169.3 days), natual plant height (45.67-67.00 cm), main stem length (75.33-131.33 cm), main stems per plant (2.67-4.33), main stem thickness (1.77-2.17 mm), fresh forage yield (21.29-39.34 t ha-1), and dry forage yield (5.86-10.39 t ha-1). The research results revealed that the Kansur cultivar was more productive in terms of forage yield in Diyarbakır conditions. Additionally, there was no statistical significant difference in forage yield traits among the 30 kg ha⁻¹, 60 kg ha⁻¹, and 90 kg ha⁻¹ phosphorus dose treatments. Aditionally, forage yield obtained from these phosphorus dose treatments was higher than that of the control (0 dose) treatment, which recieved no phosphorus application.

Keywords

Vicia pannonica Crantz , Plant height , Phosphorus doses , Forage yield , Yield components , Vicia pannonica Crantz

Ethical Statement

In this study, the authors affirm their adherence to the guidelines set forth in the "Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive" and declare that they have not engaged in any activities deemed as "Actions Contrary to Scientific Research and Publication Ethics" as outlined in the relevant directive.

Supporting Institution

Dicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (DÜBAP)

Project Number

Project Number: FBE.23.002

Thanks

This study received support from the Dicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit under the Master Thesis Projects program (Project Number: FBE.23.002). The authors express their gratitude for this assistance.

Bazı Macar Fiğ Çeşitlerinde Farklı Fosfor Dozlarının Ot Verimi ve İlgili Özellikler Üzerindeki Etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışma bazı Macar fiğ çeşitlerinde (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) farklı fosfor dozlarının ot verimi ve ilgili özellikler üzerindeki etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Bu amaçla Dicle Üniversitesi Bismil Meslek Yüksekokulu Araştırma Arazisinde tarla denemesi, Tesadüf Bloklarında Bölünmüş Parseller Deneme Deseni kullanılarak düzenlenmiş ve üç tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırma bulguları göre, istatiksel olarak incelenen önemli bazı özellikler yönünden önemli farklılıkların (P<0.05) oluştuğu saptanmıştır. Araştırmada kullanılan fosfor dozlarının etkisiyle Macar fiğ çeşitlerinde incelenen özelliklerin aşağıdaki şekilde değişim gösterdiği gözlemlenmiştir, %50 çiçeklenme gün sayısı 153.3-169.3 gün, doğal bitki boyu 45.67-67.00 cm, ana sap uzunluğu 75.33-131.33 cm, ana sap sayısı 2.67-4.33 sap bitki-1, ana sap kalınlığı 1.77-2.17 mm, yeşil ot verimi 21.29-39.34 t ha-1 ve kuru ot verimi 5.86-10.39 t ha-1. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; Diyarbakır ekolojik koşullarında ot verimi bakımından Kansur çeşidinin daha verimli olduğu tespit edilirken, fosfor dozları bakımından ise 30 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1 ve 90 kg ha-1 fosfor dozu uygulamaları arasında yeşil ot verimi ve kuru ot verimi özellikleri bakımından istatiksel olarak fark olmadığı bu uygulamaların fosfor uygulanmamış kontrol dozu (0 doz) uygulamasına göre daha yüksek miktarlarda yeşil ot ve kuru ot verimi verdiği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Vicia pannonica Crantz , Bitki boyu , Fosfor dozları , Ot verimi , Verim unsurları , Vicia pannonica Crantz

Project Number

Project Number: FBE.23.002

References

• M. S. Sayar, A. E. Anlarsal and M. Başbağ, “Current situation, problems and solutions for cultivation of forage crops in the Southeastern Anatolian Region,” Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Harran University, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 59–67, 2010.
• C. Yucel, M. S. Sayar and H. Yucel, “Determination of the some properties related to forage quality of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes under the Diyarbakir condition,” Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Harran University, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45–54, 2012.
• H. K. Firincioglu, S. Unal, Z. Pank and S. P. S. Beniwal, “Growth and development of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in the semi-arid central Türkiye,” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 430–442, 2012.
• J. R. Magness, G. M. Markle and C. C. Compton, Food and Feed Crops of the United States. NJ, USA: New Jersey Agric. Exp. Stn., IR Bul. 1 Bul. 828, 1971.
• M. S. Sayar, A. E. Anlarsal and M. Basbağ, “Genotype–environment interactions and stability analysis for dry-matter yield and seed yield in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.),” Turkish Journal of Field Crops, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 238–246, 2013
• D. Fayetorbay, B. Çomaklı and M. Dașcı, “Effects of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria, phosphorus fertilizer and poultry manure treatments on the seed yield and yield components of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Roth),” Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 345–357, 2014, doi: 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001293.
• D. T. Gardiner and R. W. Miller, Soils in Our Environment. 11th ed., Upper Saddle Hill, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008.
• İ. Bolat and O. Kara, “Plant nutrients: sources, functions, deficiencies and redundancy,” Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 218–228, 2017, doi: 10.24011/barofd.251313.
• W. Bergmann, Nutritional Disorders of Plants: Development, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis. Jena, Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1992.
• B. Kacar and V. Katkat, Plant Nutrition. 5th ed., Kızılay, Ankara: Nobel Publications Distribution Trade Ltd. Co., 2010.
• C. Jones and J. Jacobsen, “Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility,” Nutrient Management Module 2. Montana, ABD: Montana State University Extension Service Publication, Sept. 2016, 4449–2, pp. 1-12. [Online]. Available: https://l24.im/dif21Xz
• E. Epstein and A. Bloom, Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspective. 2nd ed., Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 2005.
• H. D. Foth, Fundamentals of Soil Science. 7th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
• E. J. Plaster, Soil Science and Management. 2nd ed., Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers Inc., 1992.
• A. McCauley, C. Jones and J. Jacobsen, “Nutrient Management,” Nutrient Management Module 9. Montana, ABD: Montana State University Extension Service Publication, June 2011, 4449-9, pp. 1–16. [Online]. Available: https://l24.im/eu6BqLR
• P. S. Bindraban, C. O. Dimkpa and R. Pandey, “Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 299–317, 2020.
• A. Ghizaw, T. Mamo, Z. Yilma, A. Molla and Y. Ashagre, “Nitrogen and phosphorus effects on faba bean yield and soma yield components,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 182, pp. 167–174, 1999.
• M. A. Turk and A. M. Tawaha, “Impact of seeding rate, seeding date, rate and method of phosphorus application in faba bean (Vicia faba L. minor) in the absence of moisture stress,” Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, vol. 6, pp. 171–178, 2002.
• A. Yemane and A. O. Skjelvag, “Effects of fertilizer phosphorus on yield traits of Dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) under field conditions,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 189, pp. 14–20, 2003.
• S. Yilmaz, “Effects of increased phosphorus rates and plant densities on yield and yield-related traits of narbon vetch lines,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2008.
• F. Yildiz and M. Turk, “Effects of phosphorus fertilization on forage yield and quality of common vetch (Vicia sativa Roth.),” Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 134–139, 2015.
• TIRTAFLS, Technical Instruction for Registration Trials in Forage Legumes Species. Ankara, Türkiye: Seed Registration and Certification Centre, 2019.
• SAS Institute, JMP Statistics. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc., 2002.
• F. Oncan Sümer and H. Erten, “The effect of different phosphorus doses on yield and yield components and protein ratio of broad bean (Vicia faba L.),” Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2022, doi: 10.25308/aduziraat.1054859.
• M. S. Sayar, “Studies on determining genotype-environment interactions and stabilities of some line and cultivars of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) for important agronomic traits in Diyarbakır ecological conditions,” PhD dissertation, Çukurova University, Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops, Adana, Türkiye, 2011.
• N. Tas, L. Tahtacioglu and C. Aygün, “Vetch Breeding Studies in Eastern Anatolia Region,” in Türkiye 7th Field Crops Congress, Erzurum, Türkiye, 25–27 June 2007, pp. 102–105.
• S. Hashalıcı, S. Uzun, H. Özaktan and M. Kaplan, “Determination of forage yield and quality of some Hungarian Vetch cultivars at Kayseri arid conditions,” Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 113–123, 2017.
• Y. E. Koc, “Determination of genotype-environmental interaction of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.),” Master’s Thesis, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops, Eskişehir, Türkiye, 2020.
• M. S. Sayar, H. Karahan, Y. Han, S. Tekdal and M. Başbağ, “Determination of forage yield, its affecting components and relationships among traits of some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes in Kızıltepe ecological conditions,” Journal of Agricultural Sciences Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 126–130, 2012.
• H. Cebeci, “Effects of different phosphorus fertilizer doses on seed yield and yield components in some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) cultivars,” PhD Dissertation, Ankara University, Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops, Ankara, Türkiye, 2017.
• M. Bağcı, “Orta Anadolu koşullarında Macar fiğinde (Vicia Pannonica Crantz. Cv. Tarm Beyazı-98) sıra arası ve tohum miktarının ot verimine etkileri,” Master’s Thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Science, Adana, Türkiye, 2010.
• S. Şimsek, “Kırşehir koşullarında farklı Macar fiği (Vicia pannonica Crantz) + İtalyan çimi (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) karışım oranlarının verim ve kalite üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi,” Master’s Thesis, Ahi Evran University, Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops, Kırşehir, Türkiye, 2015.
• A. Orak and İ. Nizam, “Trakya Bölgesinde Macar Fiği (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) Hatlarının Önemli Bazı Verim ve Verim Unsurlarının Belirlenmesine İlişkin Bir Araştırma,” in Türkiye 5th Field Crops Congress, Diyarbakır, Türkiye, 13–17 October 2003, vol. 1, pp. 331–335.
• S. Temel and C. Şahin, “The effect of different nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer doses on the herbage yield and quality properties of atriplex nitens Schkuhr,” International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 491–501, 2022, doi: 10.24180/ijaws.1174766.
• M. A. Özyazıcı and S. Açıkbaş, “Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer Doses on Herbage and Seed Yield in Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.),” European Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 17, pp. 1031–1036, 2019, doi: 10.31590/ejosat.655253.
• S. Temel and N. Şurgun, “The Effect of Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Doses on Hay Yield and Quality of Quinoa,” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1785–1796, 2019, doi: 10.21597/jist.581836.
• T. Polat, B. Bukun and M. Okant, “Dose response effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on forage quality, yield and economic return of rangelands,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 151–160, 2007.
• V. Mihailovic, A. Mikic, B. Cupina, S. Katic, D. Karagic, I. Pataki, and P. Eric, “Yield and forage yield components in winter vetch cultivars,” Grassland Science in Europe, vol. 11, pp. 255–257, 2006.
• E. Siverek and E. Çaçan, “Determination of yield and quality potentials of some Hungarian vetch varieties in Bingöl province ecological conditions,” International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2023, doi: 10.24180/ijaws.1170031.
• M. S. Sayar, S. Tekdal, Y. Han, M. Ş. Yasak, A. E. Anlarsal, M. Başbağ and İ. Gül, “Determination of yield and yield components of some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes in Diyarbakir conditions,” in International Participation Public University-Industry Cooperation Symposium and Marble Council, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Türkiye, 24–26 May 2010, pp. 351–356.