Research Article

Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes

Volume: 4 Number: 1 June 1, 2015
Bilge Bahar
TR EN

Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes

Abstract

In this study, relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll contents of some winter wheat genotypes, agronomical traits, and some physiological characters such as canopy temperature, membrane thermal stability, membrane injury, and relative water content of flag leaf were evaluated. The study was conducted in the Application and Research Area of Siran Vocational School of Gumushane University in the growth season of 2010-2011. Chlorophyll content of genotypes were measured by a portable chlorophyll meter at the start of anthesis ZGS 60 and the early milky stage ZGS 73 . The mean chlorophyll content of the tested genotypes at ZGS 60 was 45.6 as SPAD unit, and ranged from 39.1 for line 51 to 54.0 for line 42. Chlorophyll content as the mean of all genotypes at ZGS 73 was 41.8 as SPAD unit. Mean chlorophyll content of the genotypes at this growth stage ranged between 35.2 for line 27 and 50.9 for line 44. The mean pigment loss was the percent of 8.3 as an average of all genotypes. The chlorophyll loss ranged between 1.7 % for line 75 and 19.2 % for line 32. The statistically significant correlations between chlorophyll contents and main yield components like grain number per spike and spike yield were obtained at both measuring stages. The significant correlation between chlorophyll loss and chlorophyll content was positive at ZGS 60, but negative at ZGS 73. These results show that determination of flag leaf chlorophyll content in winter wheat is important selection criteria for yield components in breeding programs.

Keywords

Chlorophyll content, Senescence, MTS, RWC, Winter wheat

References

  1. B. Demmig-Adams, W.W. Adams, The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science 1, 21-27, (1996).
  2. U. Kumar, A.K. Joshi, M. Kumari, R. Paliwal, S. Kuma, M.S. Roder, Identification of QTLs for stay green trait in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the ’Chirya 3’ × ’Sonalika’ population, Euphytica 174, 437-445, (2010).
  3. H. Thomas, C.M. Smart, Crops that stay green, Annals of Applied Biology 123, 193-201, (1993).
  4. G. Spano, N. Di Fonzo, C. Perrotta, C. Platani, G. Ronga, D.W. Lawlor, J.A. Napier, P.R. Shewry, Physiological characterization of stay green mutants in durum wheat, Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1415-1420, (2003).
  5. D.L. Sparkes, Are ‘ancient wheat species’ more adapted to hostile environments than modern bread wheat? South African Journal of Plant and Soil 27, 331-334, (2010).
  6. D.I. Arnon, Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris, Plant Physiology 24, 1-15 (1949).
  7. F.G. Adamsen, P.J. Pinter, E.M. Barnes, R.L. La Morte, G.W. Wall, S.W. Leavitt, B.A. Kimball, Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera, Crop Science 39, 719-724, (1999).
  8. M. Hafsi, W. Mechmeche, L. Bouamama, A. Djekoune, M. Zaharieva, P. Monneveux, Flag leaf senescence, as evaluated by numerical image analysis, and its relationship with yield under drought in durum wheat, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185, 275-280, (2000).
  9. P. Janaki, T.M. Thiyagarajan, Effect of SPAD techniques and planting density on ‘Y’ leaf nitrogen concentration in transplanted rice, Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52, 95-104, (2004).
  10. M. Lopes, M.P. Reynolds, Stay-green in spring bread wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology, Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 3789- 3798, (2012).
APA
Bahar, B. (2015). Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 1-5. https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX
AMA
1.Bahar B. Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes. DUFED. 2015;4(1):1-5. https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX
Chicago
Bahar, Bilge. 2015. “Relationships Among Flag Leaf Chlorophyll Content, Agronomical Traits, and Some Physiological Traits of Winter Wheat Genotypes”. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 4 (1): 1-5. https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX.
EndNote
Bahar B (June 1, 2015) Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 4 1 1–5.
IEEE
[1]B. Bahar, “Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes”, DUFED, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–5, June 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX
ISNAD
Bahar, Bilge. “Relationships Among Flag Leaf Chlorophyll Content, Agronomical Traits, and Some Physiological Traits of Winter Wheat Genotypes”. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 4/1 (June 1, 2015): 1-5. https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX.
JAMA
1.Bahar B. Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes. DUFED. 2015;4:1–5.
MLA
Bahar, Bilge. “Relationships Among Flag Leaf Chlorophyll Content, Agronomical Traits, and Some Physiological Traits of Winter Wheat Genotypes”. Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, June 2015, pp. 1-5, https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX.
Vancouver
1.Bilge Bahar. Relationships among flag leaf chlorophyll content, agronomical traits, and some physiological traits of winter wheat genotypes. DUFED [Internet]. 2015 Jun. 1;4(1):1-5. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA47FE23WX