TR
EN
Effects of Alternative Binder and Aggregate Use on the Compressive Strength of Concrete
Abstract
The use of industrial wastes in concrete production is of significant importance in reducing environmental impacts and lowering costs. In this study, concrete mixtures were designed by using olivine minerals as a substitute for Portland cement (PC), chromite powder as fine aggregate, and ferrochromium slag as coarse aggregate. The effects of different binder and aggregate ratios on the compressive strength of the concrete were examined after a 7-day curing period. Experimental results showed that mixtures with 5% olivine substitution achieved the highest compressive strength of 22.30 MPa, particularly in mixtures with a cement dosage of 500 kg/m³. This result indicates that the low water/cement ratio and the addition of olivine contribute to increased early-age strength. Furthermore, increasing the chromite powder content to 20% in mixtures with a water/cement ratio of 0.61 led to an 11.7% increase in compressive strength, demonstrating the positive impact of chromite powder on the mechanical performance of the concrete. These findings highlight that cement replacements and aggregate types can significantly affect the mechanical properties of concrete, emphasizing the need for careful selection of both material compositions.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Munzur University
Project Number
YLMUB021-17
Thanks
This study was supported by the Scientific Research Coordination Unit of Munzur University under project number YLMUB021-17.
References
- [1] S. Mehmood, K. Zamani, S. Khan, Z. Ali, and H. U. Rashid Khan, “The role of green industrial transformation in mitigating carbon emissions: Exploring the channels of technological innovation and environmental regulation,” Energy and Built Environment, vol. 5, pp. 464–479, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.03.001.
- [2] Y. A. Hajam, R. Kumar, and A. Kumar, “Environmental waste management strategies and vermi transformation for sustainable development,” Environmental Challenges, vol. 13, 100747, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100747.
- [3] A. I. Almohana, M. Y. Abdulwahid, I. Galobardes, J. Mushtaq, and S. F. Almojil, "Producing sustainable concrete with plastic waste: A review," Environ. Challenges, vol. 9, p. 100626, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100626.
- [4] T. Esin and N. Cosgun, “A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey,” Building and Environment, vol. 42, pp. 1667–1674, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.008.
- [5] İ. Şanal, “Beton üretiminin karbondioksit emisyonları açısından önemi: Toplumsal ve çevresel etkiler,” Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 369–378, 2018.
- [6] J. M. Etcheverry, Y. A. Villagran-Zaccardi, P. Van den Heede, V. Hallet, and N. De Belie, “Effect of sodium sulfate activation on the early age behaviour and microstructure development of hybrid cementitious systems containing Portland cement, and blast furnace slag,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 141, 105101, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105101.
- [7] M.A.G.P. Perera and P.G. Ranjith, “Eco-friendly cementitious composites for enhanced strength: Emerging trends and innovations,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 468, 142962, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142962.
- [8] M. Şahin Yön, B. Yön, M. Karataş, and A. Benli, “Sustainable use of boron waste and volcanic scoria in slag-based self-compacting alkali-activated mortars: Fresh, mechanical and durability properties,” Sustain. Chem. Pharm., vol. 41, 101664, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2024.101664.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Construction Materials
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
September 30, 2025
Publication Date
September 30, 2025
Submission Date
March 31, 2025
Acceptance Date
June 29, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 16 Number: 3