Research Article
Year 2017,
Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 549 - 556, 15.12.2017
Abstract
Bireyler maddi çevrelerini günlük
aktivite-nesne, nesne-mekan ilişkileriyle inşa ederler. Gündelik yaşam
deneyimleri, mekan organizasyonları için en önemli bileşenlerden biridir. Mekan
içerisinde yapılan eylemlerle anlam kazanır. Ayrıca bu eylemler nesnelerle
doğrudan etkileşim içerisindedir. Nesne seçimleri, yaşam tarzlarıyla ilişkili
olarak yapılan aktiviteler doğrultusunda mekanda yer bulur. Bunun yanı sıra
mobilyalar birbiriyle ve diğer dekorasyon elemanlarıyla birlikte
düzenlenmektedir. Araştırma mobilya düzenlemelerini işlevsellik konularıyla
beraber anlamaya çalışmaktadır.
Araştırma günlük yaşam eylemlerinin
nesnelerin seçimi ve kullanımındaki etkisini sorgulamaktadır. Çalışma, mekan ve
nesnelerin kültürel bilgileri arttırmak için etnografik araştırma ile
yürütülmüştür. Tarihle farklı kültürel etkileşimlere sahip olan Konya çalışma
alanı olarak seçildi. Sekiz Konya evleri, mobilya seçimlerine yönelik
ayarların, mobilya kullanımının ve kültürlerin etkileri ile araştırılmıştır.
References
- [1]. Okka, B., Durduran, Y., & Kodaz, N. D., (2016). Traditional Practices of Konya Women During Pregnancy, Birth, the Postpartum Period, and Newborn Care. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 46(2), 501-511. [2]. Kaynaş, H. B., Baran, F., & Bülüç, E., (2016). Analyzing The Effects of Spatial Equipment on Cultural Structure via Konya Houses. [3]. Yaldız, E., Aydın, D., & Sıramkaya, S. B., (2014). Loss Of City Identities In The Process Of Change: The City Of Konya-Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 221-233. [4]. Canan, F., Sayın, S., & Korumaz, M., (2015). Cultural Identity in Contemporary Turkish Architecture Case Study in Konya. [5]. Koyuncu, A., (2013). Kimliğin inşasında kent: Konya örneği. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(2). [6]. Das, V., Ellen, J. M., & Leonard, L., (2008). On the Modalities of the Domestic. Home Cultures, 5(3), 349-371. [7] . Dakers, C., (2005). Bloomsbury Rooms: Modernism, Subculture, and Domesticity. Journal of Design History, 18(3), 311-313. [8]. Reed, C., (2004). Bloomsbury Rooms Modernism, Subculture, and Domesticity. [9]. Taşkın, B. (2017). Daily Life Objects, Interaction of Cultures and the Selected Izmir Homes. Izmir Institute of Technology, [10]. Vaquero, M., & Pastó, I., (2001). The Definition of Spatial Units in Middle Palaeolithic Sites: the Hearth-Related Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(11), 1209-1220. [11]. Garvey, P., (2012). Living Rooms A2 - Smith, Susan J. In International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 169-173). San Diego: Elsevier. [12]. Goffman, E., (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Double Day Anchor Books. [13]. Rechavi, T. B., (2009). A Room for Living: Private and Public Aspects in the Experience of the Living Room. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 133-143. [14]. Saruwono, M., Zulkiflin, N. F., & Mohammad, N. M. N. (2012). Living in Living Rooms: Furniture Arrangement in Apartment-Type Family Housing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 909-919. [15]. Tsunetsugu, Y., Miyazaki, Y., & Sato, H. (2005). Visual Effects of Interior Design in Actual-size Living Rooms on Physiological Responses. Building and Environment, 40(10), 1341-1346. [16]. Mitton, M., & Nystuen, C. (2016). Residential Interior Design: A Guide to Planning Spaces. John Wiley & Sons. [17]. Laumann, E. O., & House, J. S. (1970). Living Room Styles and Social Attributes: The Patterning of Material Artifacts in a Modern Urban Community. Sociology and Social Research, 54(3), 321-342. [18]. Amaturo, E., Costagliola, S., & Ragone, G. (1987). Furnishing and Status Attributes: A Sociological Study of the Living Room. Environment and Behavior, 19(2), 228-249. [19]. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of Childhood; a Social History of Family Life. Translated from the French by Robert Baldick: New York, Knopf [1970]. [20]. Grier, K. (2013). Culture and Comfort: Parlor Making and Middle-class Identity, 1850-1930: Smithsonian Institution. [21]. Cromley, E. C. (1999). Alone Together: A History of New York's Early Apartments: Cornell University Press. [22]. Wood, D., Beck, R. J., Wood, I., Wood, R., & Wood, C. (1994). Home Rules. People Place and Space Reader, 173-175. [23]. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self: Cambridge University Press. [24]. Shenk, D., Kuwahara, K., & Zablotsky, D. (2004). Older Women's Attachments to Their Home and Possessions. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(2), 157-169. [25]. Crane, D., & Bovone, L. (2006). Approaches to Material Culture: The Sociology of Fashion and Clothing. Poetics, 34(6), 319-333. [26]. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice: Routledge.
Year 2017,
Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 549 - 556, 15.12.2017
Abstract
- People aim to construct their environment
within object-practice, practice-space and space-object relations. Everyday
life experiences are the main element to organize the spaces. A space is
meaningful with the activities in it. Moreover, the activities are associated
with the objects. Thus, the furniture together with the other home decoration
elements is arranged to each other. The research aims to understand the
furniture arrangements with focusing functional issues.
The research questions the impacts of daily
life practices through object selection and arrangement in daily life. The
study conducted with ethnographic research to enhance cultural information of
space and objects in daily life. The case is selected as Konya that has
different cultural interactions towards history. Eight Konya homes are
investigated with the settings, furniture usage and impacts of cultures to the
furniture selections.
References
- [1]. Okka, B., Durduran, Y., & Kodaz, N. D., (2016). Traditional Practices of Konya Women During Pregnancy, Birth, the Postpartum Period, and Newborn Care. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 46(2), 501-511. [2]. Kaynaş, H. B., Baran, F., & Bülüç, E., (2016). Analyzing The Effects of Spatial Equipment on Cultural Structure via Konya Houses. [3]. Yaldız, E., Aydın, D., & Sıramkaya, S. B., (2014). Loss Of City Identities In The Process Of Change: The City Of Konya-Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 221-233. [4]. Canan, F., Sayın, S., & Korumaz, M., (2015). Cultural Identity in Contemporary Turkish Architecture Case Study in Konya. [5]. Koyuncu, A., (2013). Kimliğin inşasında kent: Konya örneği. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(2). [6]. Das, V., Ellen, J. M., & Leonard, L., (2008). On the Modalities of the Domestic. Home Cultures, 5(3), 349-371. [7] . Dakers, C., (2005). Bloomsbury Rooms: Modernism, Subculture, and Domesticity. Journal of Design History, 18(3), 311-313. [8]. Reed, C., (2004). Bloomsbury Rooms Modernism, Subculture, and Domesticity. [9]. Taşkın, B. (2017). Daily Life Objects, Interaction of Cultures and the Selected Izmir Homes. Izmir Institute of Technology, [10]. Vaquero, M., & Pastó, I., (2001). The Definition of Spatial Units in Middle Palaeolithic Sites: the Hearth-Related Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(11), 1209-1220. [11]. Garvey, P., (2012). Living Rooms A2 - Smith, Susan J. In International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 169-173). San Diego: Elsevier. [12]. Goffman, E., (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Double Day Anchor Books. [13]. Rechavi, T. B., (2009). A Room for Living: Private and Public Aspects in the Experience of the Living Room. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 133-143. [14]. Saruwono, M., Zulkiflin, N. F., & Mohammad, N. M. N. (2012). Living in Living Rooms: Furniture Arrangement in Apartment-Type Family Housing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 909-919. [15]. Tsunetsugu, Y., Miyazaki, Y., & Sato, H. (2005). Visual Effects of Interior Design in Actual-size Living Rooms on Physiological Responses. Building and Environment, 40(10), 1341-1346. [16]. Mitton, M., & Nystuen, C. (2016). Residential Interior Design: A Guide to Planning Spaces. John Wiley & Sons. [17]. Laumann, E. O., & House, J. S. (1970). Living Room Styles and Social Attributes: The Patterning of Material Artifacts in a Modern Urban Community. Sociology and Social Research, 54(3), 321-342. [18]. Amaturo, E., Costagliola, S., & Ragone, G. (1987). Furnishing and Status Attributes: A Sociological Study of the Living Room. Environment and Behavior, 19(2), 228-249. [19]. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of Childhood; a Social History of Family Life. Translated from the French by Robert Baldick: New York, Knopf [1970]. [20]. Grier, K. (2013). Culture and Comfort: Parlor Making and Middle-class Identity, 1850-1930: Smithsonian Institution. [21]. Cromley, E. C. (1999). Alone Together: A History of New York's Early Apartments: Cornell University Press. [22]. Wood, D., Beck, R. J., Wood, I., Wood, R., & Wood, C. (1994). Home Rules. People Place and Space Reader, 173-175. [23]. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self: Cambridge University Press. [24]. Shenk, D., Kuwahara, K., & Zablotsky, D. (2004). Older Women's Attachments to Their Home and Possessions. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(2), 157-169. [25]. Crane, D., & Bovone, L. (2006). Approaches to Material Culture: The Sociology of Fashion and Clothing. Poetics, 34(6), 319-333. [26]. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice: Routledge.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 15, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 6 Issue: 3 |