Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 35 - 41, 31.12.2019

Abstract

As it is accepted and internalized as a valuable material within intercultural interaction, wood, which is most well-known material for its naturality and versatility in the world since ancient times, and which provides solutions for a wide range of different applications, has been depicted in this article in the following 3 original depictions with distinctive compositions constructed with styles and structures as different as possible with a mentality foresight upon the basis of “The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet”. The implications forming a basis for these depictions were internalized with professional/technical knowledge and in these depictions that were made with a woodlover approach; certain theoretical explanations to strengthen wood awareness and general depictions to introduce wood (considered as an exquisite natural material in intercultural interaction) were made.

References

  • [1]. Wittgenstein, L., (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, London.
  • [2]. Tsoumis, G., (1991). Science and Technology of Wood: Structure, Properties, Utilisation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • [3]. Mantel, K., (1964). History of the International Science of Forestry with Special Consideration of Central Europe; Literature, Training, and Research from the Earliest Beginnings to the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Forestry Research, 1, 1-37.
  • [4]. Schmucker, T. and Linnemann, G., (1951). Geschichte der Anatomie des Holzes. In “Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik”, H. Freund, Ed., Umschau Verlag, Frankfurt, 1-78.
  • [5]. Schweingruber, F.H., (2007). Wood Structure and Environment. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • [6]. Tsoumis, G., (1968). Wood as Raw Material: Source, Structure, Chemical Composition, Growth, Degradation and Identification. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • [7]. Usta, I., (2017). Depictions on Wood: Acceptation and Internalization of Wood, which is an intercultural interaction tool, as “A Valuable Object” (Wood is a Symbol of Civilization). International Research Group on Wood Protection, IRG/WP 17-40776.
  • [8]. Sargut, A.S., (2010). Kültürler Arası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim. İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • [9]. Geels, F.W. and Schot, J., (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399-417.

Depictions on Wood: Acceptation and Internalization of Wood, which is an Intercultural Interaction Tool, as “A Valuable Object” (The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet)

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 35 - 41, 31.12.2019

Abstract

As it is accepted and
internalized as a valuable material within intercultural interaction, wood,
which is most well-known material for its naturality and versatility in the
world since ancient times, and which provides solutions for a wide range of
different applications, has been depicted in this article in the following 3
original depictions with distinctive compositions constructed with styles and
structures as different as possible with a mentality foresight upon the basis
of “The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet”. The implications forming a basis
for these depictions were internalized with professional/technical knowledge
and in these depictions that were made with a woodlover approach; certain
theoretical explanations to strengthen wood awareness and general depictions to
introduce wood (considered as an exquisite natural material in intercultural
interaction) were made.

References

  • [1]. Wittgenstein, L., (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, London.
  • [2]. Tsoumis, G., (1991). Science and Technology of Wood: Structure, Properties, Utilisation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • [3]. Mantel, K., (1964). History of the International Science of Forestry with Special Consideration of Central Europe; Literature, Training, and Research from the Earliest Beginnings to the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Forestry Research, 1, 1-37.
  • [4]. Schmucker, T. and Linnemann, G., (1951). Geschichte der Anatomie des Holzes. In “Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik”, H. Freund, Ed., Umschau Verlag, Frankfurt, 1-78.
  • [5]. Schweingruber, F.H., (2007). Wood Structure and Environment. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • [6]. Tsoumis, G., (1968). Wood as Raw Material: Source, Structure, Chemical Composition, Growth, Degradation and Identification. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • [7]. Usta, I., (2017). Depictions on Wood: Acceptation and Internalization of Wood, which is an intercultural interaction tool, as “A Valuable Object” (Wood is a Symbol of Civilization). International Research Group on Wood Protection, IRG/WP 17-40776.
  • [8]. Sargut, A.S., (2010). Kültürler Arası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim. İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • [9]. Geels, F.W. and Schot, J., (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399-417.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

İlker Usta

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Usta, İ. (2019). DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET). İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 35-41.
AMA Usta İ. DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET). İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi. December 2019;8(2):35-41.
Chicago Usta, İlker. “DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS ‘A VALUABLE OBJECT’ (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)”. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi 8, no. 2 (December 2019): 35-41.
EndNote Usta İ (December 1, 2019) DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET). İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi 8 2 35–41.
IEEE İ. Usta, “DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS ‘A VALUABLE OBJECT’ (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)”, İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–41, 2019.
ISNAD Usta, İlker. “DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS ‘A VALUABLE OBJECT’ (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)”. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi 8/2 (December 2019), 35-41.
JAMA Usta İ. DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET). İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;8:35–41.
MLA Usta, İlker. “DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS ‘A VALUABLE OBJECT’ (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)”. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 2, 2019, pp. 35-41.
Vancouver Usta İ. DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET). İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;8(2):35-41.