Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix

Year 2024, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 433 - 446, 11.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240306

Abstract

Input-output analyses, which investigate intersectoral interdependencies and structural changes, are critical to sectoral planning by providing policymakers with significant information. This study draws on the input-output tables calculated by the Asian Development Bank for Asian and Pacific countries, specifically for the Kyrgyz Republic. The decomposition of output changes and the multiplier product matrix are employed to identify any structural changes in the country’s economy. The empirical findings indicate that a major structural change has occurred in the Kyrgyz economy, led by the financial intermediation sector.

References

  • ADB (2018). “Economic Indicators for South and Central Asia, Input Output Tables”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • ADB (2020). “Economic Indicators for South and Central Asia, Input Output Tables”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • ADB (2022). “Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2022”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • Ali, Y., Sabir, M., & Muhammad, N. (2019). “A comparative input-output analysis of the construction sector in three developing economies of South Asia”. Construction Management and Economics, 37(11), 643-658.
  • Aydoğuş, O. (2010). “Girdi çıktı modellerine giriş”. Efil Yayınevi, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Bekhet, H. A., & Abdullah, A. (2010). “Energy use in agriculture sector: input-output analysis”. International Business Research, 3(3), 111-121.
  • Chenery, H. B., & Watanabe, T. (1958). “International comparisons of the structure of production”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 487-521.
  • Dietzenbacher, E., & Van der Linden, J. A. (1997). “Sectoral and Spatial Linkages in the EC Production Structure”. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 37, 235-257.
  • Feldman, S. J., McClain, D., & Palmer, K. (1987). “Sources of structural change in the United States, 1963-78: An input-output perspective”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 503-510.
  • Guo, D., & Hewings, G. J. (2001). “Comparative analysis of China’s economic structures between 1987 and 1997: an input-output prospective”. Discussion Papers REAL.
  • Guo, J., & Planting, M. A. (2000). “Using input-output analysis to measure US economic structural change over a 24 year period”. US. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), WP2000-01.
  • Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G., & Leon, F. (2007). “Building-up influence: post-war industrialization in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 27, 281-300.
  • Hor, C. (2021). “Assessing the dynamic tourism inter-industry linkages and economic structural changes in Cambodia’s economy”. Journal of Economic Structures, 10(1), 1-24.
  • Huang, Y., Haseeb, M., Khan, J., & Hossain, M. E. (2023). “Structural changes and economic landscape of the Indian economy: 2000‐2019”. Review of Development Economics, 27(1), 395-422.
  • Izvorski, I., Mbowe, A., Dubashov, B., Gassner, K., Ferrantino, M. J., Islam, R., & Sahovic, T. (2020). “Kyrgyz Republic Country Economic Memorandum”. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • İlhan, B., & Yaman, H. (2011). “A comparative input‐output analysis of the construction sector in Turkey and EU countries”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), 248-265.
  • Leontief, W. (1936). “Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States”. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(3), 105-125.
  • Loizou, E., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Michailidis, A., Tsakiri, M., & Theodossiou, G. (2015). “Linkages of the energy sector in the Greek economy: an input-output approach”. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), 393-411.
  • Magtibay‐Ramos, N., Estrada, G. E., & Felipe, J. (2011). “Exploring the Philippine economic landscape and structural change using the input‐output framework”. International Journal of Development Issues, 10(1), 34-59.
  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). “Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions”. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.
  • Munjal, P. (2007). “Structural changes in Indian economy: An input-output analysis”. Indian Economic Review, 42(1), 77-95.
  • Nazara, S., Guo, D., Hewings, G. J., & Dridi, C. (2003). “PyIO. A Python Module for Input-Output”. The Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL).
  • Öney, E. (1980). “İktisadi Planlama”. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 438 (İkinci Basım).
  • Özdil, T. (1993). “Türkiye Ekonomisindeki Yapısal Degişime Girdi-Çıktı Analiziyle Bir Yaklaşım”. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 109-128.
  • Özyurt, H. (2012). “İktisadi Planlama”. Aksakal Kitabevi, 3. Baskı.
  • Pietroforte, R., & Gregori, T. (2003). “An input-output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies”. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 319-327.
  • Rasmussen, P. N. (1957). “Studies in Intersectoral Relations”. North Holland Publishing.
  • San Cristóbal, J. R., & Biezma, M. V. (2006). “The mining industry in the European Union: analysis of inter-industry linkages using input-output analysis”. Resources Policy, 31(1), 1-6.
  • Seil, A., & Ichihashi, M. (2012). “Sectoral Impact of Indirect Tax Reduction on The Kyrgyz Economy Based on Input-Output Analysis”. IDEC Discussion Paper, Hiroshima University.
  • Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. (1999). “Economic landscapes: multiplier product matrix analysis for multiregional input-output systems”. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 40(1), 59-74.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J., & Guo, J. (1996a). “Sources of structural change in input–output systems: a field of influence approach”. Economic Systems Research, 8(1), 15-32.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J., Okuyama, Y., & Guo, J. (1996b). “Japanese regional economic structure interpreted through the multiplier product matrix”. Studies in Regional Science, 26(2), 1-20.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings G. J., & Guo, J. (1997) “Evaluation of economic structure: input-output multiplier product matrix”. Discussion Papers, 94-T-12, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, J. D., & Guo, J. (2000). “A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse”. Economic Systems Research, 12(3), 401-423.
  • Surugiu, C. (2009). “The Economic Impact of Tourism. An Input-Output Analysis”. Revista Romana de Economie, 28(2).
  • Temurshoev, U. (2004). “Key sectors in the Kyrgyzstan Economy”. Cerge-Ei Discussion Paper Series, 135.
  • Toh, M. H., & Thangavelu, S. M. (2013). “An input–output study of the Singapore information sector”. Economic Systems Research, 25(2), 233-244.
  • Wu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2005). “Input-output analysis of the Chinese construction sector”. Construction Management and Economics, 23(9), 905-912.
  • Xing, W., Ye, X., & Kui, L. (2011). “Measuring convergence of China's ICT industry: An input-output analysis”. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 301-313.
  • Yamano, T., Hill, H., Ginting, E., & Samson, J. (2019). “Kyrgyz Republic: improving growth potential”. Asian Development Bank.

Kırgız Cumhuriyeti Ekonomisi İçin Yapısal Değişim Analizi: Üretim Değişimlerinin Ayrıştırılması ve Çarpan Üretim Matrisinden Bulgular

Year 2024, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 433 - 446, 11.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240306

Abstract

Sektörel ölçekli iktisadi planlamada girdi-çıktı analizi kilit rol oynamaktadır. Sektörlerin bağımlılık derecelerini ve yapısal değişimlerini incelemek için kullanılan girdi-çıktı analizinden elde edilen bulgular, politika yapıcıları açısından önemli bilgiler içermektedir. Bu çalışmada Asya Kalkınma Bankası’nın 2000 ve 2018 yılları için Kırgız Cumhuriyeti başta olmak üzere, Asya ve Pasifik ülkeleri için hazırladığı girdi-çıktı tabloları kullanılmıştır. Kırgız Cumhuriyeti ekonomisi için yapısal değişim olup olmadığı, üretim değişimlerinin ayrıştırılması ve çarpan üretim matrisi üzerinden incelenmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen ampirik bulgular, Kırgız Cumhuriyeti ekonomisinde ciddi bir yapısal değişim yaşandığını ve finansal aracılık sektörünün ilgili değişimin öncüsü niteliğinde olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

References

  • ADB (2018). “Economic Indicators for South and Central Asia, Input Output Tables”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • ADB (2020). “Economic Indicators for South and Central Asia, Input Output Tables”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • ADB (2022). “Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2022”. Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
  • Ali, Y., Sabir, M., & Muhammad, N. (2019). “A comparative input-output analysis of the construction sector in three developing economies of South Asia”. Construction Management and Economics, 37(11), 643-658.
  • Aydoğuş, O. (2010). “Girdi çıktı modellerine giriş”. Efil Yayınevi, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Bekhet, H. A., & Abdullah, A. (2010). “Energy use in agriculture sector: input-output analysis”. International Business Research, 3(3), 111-121.
  • Chenery, H. B., & Watanabe, T. (1958). “International comparisons of the structure of production”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 487-521.
  • Dietzenbacher, E., & Van der Linden, J. A. (1997). “Sectoral and Spatial Linkages in the EC Production Structure”. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 37, 235-257.
  • Feldman, S. J., McClain, D., & Palmer, K. (1987). “Sources of structural change in the United States, 1963-78: An input-output perspective”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 503-510.
  • Guo, D., & Hewings, G. J. (2001). “Comparative analysis of China’s economic structures between 1987 and 1997: an input-output prospective”. Discussion Papers REAL.
  • Guo, J., & Planting, M. A. (2000). “Using input-output analysis to measure US economic structural change over a 24 year period”. US. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), WP2000-01.
  • Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G., & Leon, F. (2007). “Building-up influence: post-war industrialization in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 27, 281-300.
  • Hor, C. (2021). “Assessing the dynamic tourism inter-industry linkages and economic structural changes in Cambodia’s economy”. Journal of Economic Structures, 10(1), 1-24.
  • Huang, Y., Haseeb, M., Khan, J., & Hossain, M. E. (2023). “Structural changes and economic landscape of the Indian economy: 2000‐2019”. Review of Development Economics, 27(1), 395-422.
  • Izvorski, I., Mbowe, A., Dubashov, B., Gassner, K., Ferrantino, M. J., Islam, R., & Sahovic, T. (2020). “Kyrgyz Republic Country Economic Memorandum”. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • İlhan, B., & Yaman, H. (2011). “A comparative input‐output analysis of the construction sector in Turkey and EU countries”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), 248-265.
  • Leontief, W. (1936). “Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States”. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18(3), 105-125.
  • Loizou, E., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Michailidis, A., Tsakiri, M., & Theodossiou, G. (2015). “Linkages of the energy sector in the Greek economy: an input-output approach”. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), 393-411.
  • Magtibay‐Ramos, N., Estrada, G. E., & Felipe, J. (2011). “Exploring the Philippine economic landscape and structural change using the input‐output framework”. International Journal of Development Issues, 10(1), 34-59.
  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). “Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions”. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.
  • Munjal, P. (2007). “Structural changes in Indian economy: An input-output analysis”. Indian Economic Review, 42(1), 77-95.
  • Nazara, S., Guo, D., Hewings, G. J., & Dridi, C. (2003). “PyIO. A Python Module for Input-Output”. The Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL).
  • Öney, E. (1980). “İktisadi Planlama”. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 438 (İkinci Basım).
  • Özdil, T. (1993). “Türkiye Ekonomisindeki Yapısal Degişime Girdi-Çıktı Analiziyle Bir Yaklaşım”. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 109-128.
  • Özyurt, H. (2012). “İktisadi Planlama”. Aksakal Kitabevi, 3. Baskı.
  • Pietroforte, R., & Gregori, T. (2003). “An input-output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies”. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 319-327.
  • Rasmussen, P. N. (1957). “Studies in Intersectoral Relations”. North Holland Publishing.
  • San Cristóbal, J. R., & Biezma, M. V. (2006). “The mining industry in the European Union: analysis of inter-industry linkages using input-output analysis”. Resources Policy, 31(1), 1-6.
  • Seil, A., & Ichihashi, M. (2012). “Sectoral Impact of Indirect Tax Reduction on The Kyrgyz Economy Based on Input-Output Analysis”. IDEC Discussion Paper, Hiroshima University.
  • Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. (1999). “Economic landscapes: multiplier product matrix analysis for multiregional input-output systems”. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 40(1), 59-74.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J., & Guo, J. (1996a). “Sources of structural change in input–output systems: a field of influence approach”. Economic Systems Research, 8(1), 15-32.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J., Okuyama, Y., & Guo, J. (1996b). “Japanese regional economic structure interpreted through the multiplier product matrix”. Studies in Regional Science, 26(2), 1-20.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings G. J., & Guo, J. (1997) “Evaluation of economic structure: input-output multiplier product matrix”. Discussion Papers, 94-T-12, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana.
  • Sonis, M., Hewings, J. D., & Guo, J. (2000). “A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse”. Economic Systems Research, 12(3), 401-423.
  • Surugiu, C. (2009). “The Economic Impact of Tourism. An Input-Output Analysis”. Revista Romana de Economie, 28(2).
  • Temurshoev, U. (2004). “Key sectors in the Kyrgyzstan Economy”. Cerge-Ei Discussion Paper Series, 135.
  • Toh, M. H., & Thangavelu, S. M. (2013). “An input–output study of the Singapore information sector”. Economic Systems Research, 25(2), 233-244.
  • Wu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2005). “Input-output analysis of the Chinese construction sector”. Construction Management and Economics, 23(9), 905-912.
  • Xing, W., Ye, X., & Kui, L. (2011). “Measuring convergence of China's ICT industry: An input-output analysis”. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 301-313.
  • Yamano, T., Hill, H., Ginting, E., & Samson, J. (2019). “Kyrgyz Republic: improving growth potential”. Asian Development Bank.
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Regional Economy
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Arya Akdeniz 0000-0002-6473-464X

Neşe Kumral 0000-0001-8214-4507

Barış Gök 0000-0002-0131-9625

Early Pub Date July 8, 2024
Publication Date July 11, 2024
Submission Date December 19, 2023
Acceptance Date March 29, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 24 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Akdeniz, A., Kumral, N., & Gök, B. (2024). Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix. Ege Academic Review, 24(3), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240306
AMA Akdeniz A, Kumral N, Gök B. Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix. ear. July 2024;24(3):433-446. doi:10.21121/eab.20240306
Chicago Akdeniz, Arya, Neşe Kumral, and Barış Gök. “Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix”. Ege Academic Review 24, no. 3 (July 2024): 433-46. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240306.
EndNote Akdeniz A, Kumral N, Gök B (July 1, 2024) Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix. Ege Academic Review 24 3 433–446.
IEEE A. Akdeniz, N. Kumral, and B. Gök, “Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix”, ear, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 433–446, 2024, doi: 10.21121/eab.20240306.
ISNAD Akdeniz, Arya et al. “Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix”. Ege Academic Review 24/3 (July 2024), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240306.
JAMA Akdeniz A, Kumral N, Gök B. Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix. ear. 2024;24:433–446.
MLA Akdeniz, Arya et al. “Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 24, no. 3, 2024, pp. 433-46, doi:10.21121/eab.20240306.
Vancouver Akdeniz A, Kumral N, Gök B. Analysis of Structural Change for the Kyrgyz Republic Economy: Evidence from Decomposition of Output Changes and Multiplier Product Matrix. ear. 2024;24(3):433-46.