Comparison of Elongation and Calcification Patterns of Styloid Process on Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images

Abstract

Purpose: The styloid process (SP) is part of the temporal bone that is a cylindric bony projection located immediately in front of the stylomastoid foramen. The normal reported length of the SP ranges from 20 to 32 mm and longer than 30 mm was considered to be elongated SP. The aim of this study was to compare the SP findings (length, type, and calcification pattern) on panoramic and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: 163 patients who had panoramic and CBCT images in the same year were included to the study. On panoramic images calcifications beyond the mandibular foramen were classified as elongated SP while on CBCT images SP which had measured more than 30mm were accepted as elongated. Varying SP calcification classifications were reported by different researchers and in this study Langlais classification (Type 1 Elongated, Type 2 Pseudoarticulated, and Type 3 Segmented), the most accepted classification, was used. Calcification pattern were classified as calcified outlined, partially calcified, nodular, and completely calcified. Results: This study included 35 (21.5%) men, 128 (78.5%) women, 163 patients with mean age 46.13 ± 0.91 (21-65) years. On panoramic images 101 (62%) normal, 45 (27.6%) bilateral and 17 (10.4) unilateral elongated SP were detected. On CBCT images 85 (52.1%) normal, 56 (34.4%) bilateral and 22 (13.4%) unilateral elongated SP were detected. The agreement of the two imaging modalities was calculated as moderate (58.4%). Type 1 SP and partially calcified were the most common features of SP in both imaging modalities. Conclusion: Some SP cases, which are evaluated as not elongated in panoramic images, can be detected as elongated in CBCT images. Therefore, it is recommended to evaluate SP with CBCT in prevalence studies and cases where length is critical.

Keywords

• cone beam computed tomography
• panoramic
• styloid process

References

1. 1. Uysal Ramadan S, Gokharman D, Tunçbilek I, Kacar M, Koşar P, Koşar U. Assessment of the stylohoid chain by 3D-CT. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29: 583-8.
2. 2. Kursoglu P, Unalan F, Erdem T. Radiological evaulation of the styloid process in young adults resident in Turkey’s Yeditepe University faculty of dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PatholOral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 491-4.
3. 3. Langlais RP, Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Elongated and mineralized stylohyoid ligament complex: a proposed classification and report of a cese of Eagle’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61: 527-32.
4. 4. Ilguy M, Ilguy D, Guler N, Bayirli G. Incidence of the type and calcification patterns in patients with elongated styloid process. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 96-102.
5. 5. Reddy RS, Kiran CS, Madhavi NS, Raghavendra MN, Satish A. Prevalence of elongation and calcification patterns of elongated styloid process in South India. J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5: e30-5.
6. 6. Alkhabuli J, Zakari H, Muayad A. Prevalence of stylohyoid complex elongation among patients attending RAK college of dental sciences clinic. Acta Stomatol Croat 2020; 54: 60-8.
7. 7. Vieira EM, Guedes OA, Morais SD, Musis CR, Albuquerque PA, Borges ÁH. Prevalence of Elongated Styloid Process in a Central Brazilian Population. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZC90-2.
8. 8. Oztunç H, Evlice B, Tatli U, Evlice A.Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of styloid process: a retrospective study of 208 patients with orofacial pain. Head Face Med 2014;10: 5.

9. 9. O Carroll MK. Calcification in the stylohyoid ligament. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 617-21.
10. 10. Ferrario VF, Sigurtá D, Daddona A, Dalloca L, Miani A, Tafuro F, Sforza C. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament: incidence and morphoquantitative evaluations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69: 524-9.
11. 11. Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Fişekçioğlu E, Dölekoğlu S. Assessment of the stylohyoid complex with cone beam computed tomography. Iran J Radiol 2012; 10: 21-6.
12. 12. Stratis A, Zhang G, Lopez-Rendon X, Politis C, Hermans R, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Shaheen E, Bosmans H. Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners. Phys Med 2017; 41: 71-7.
13. 13. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291-4.