Forensic Age Estimation Using PulpTooth Ratios in Mandibular Canines on Panoramic Radiographs

Year 2026, Volume: 53 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 25.03.2026

İbrahim Burak Yüksel , Ali Altındağ

https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2026.0001

https://izlik.org/JA67PL66MS

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between chronological age and pulp/tooth length and width ratios of mandibular canines using digital panoramic radiographs based on the method proposed by Kvaal et al.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 120 digital panoramic radiographs of individuals aged between 18 and 70 years were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements were performed on mandibular canines using the Kvaal method, and nine dental ratios (T, R, P, A, B, C, W, L, and M) were calculated. Pearson correlation analysis and one-way ANOVA were used to assess the relationship between these ratios and chronological age.
Results:
Among the variables analyzed, W (r = -0.228, p = 0.013), R (r = -0.224, p = 0.014), and B (r = -0.181, p = 0.049) showed statistically significant but weak negative correlations with age. Due to the low correlation strength, none of the variables were used to construct a regression model.
Conclusion:
Although certain pulp/tooth ratios derived from mandibular canines on digital panoramic radiographs demonstrated statistically significant correlations with chronological age, the weak strength of these associations limits their utility for accurate forensic age estimation. Further studies using three-dimensional imaging and larger, more diverse populations are recommended.

Keywords

age estimation , mandibular canine , panoramic radiography , pulp/tooth ratio

References

• Adisen MZ, Keles A, Yorubulut S, Nalcaci R. Age estimation by measuring maxillary canine pulp/tooth volume ratio on cone beam CT images with two different voxel sizes. Am J Forensic Sci. 2020;52(1):71–82. doi:10.1080/00450618.2018.1474947.
• Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 113: 44–50 [Generic]; 2016.
• Altındağ A, Öztürk B. PANORAMİK RADYOGRAFLARDA MANDİBULAR ÜÇÜNCÜ MOLARIN KÖK PULPASI GÖRÜNÜRLÜĞÜ İLE ADLİ YAŞ TAYİNİ. Aydın Dent J. 2023;9(2):11–19.
• Gustafson G. Age determinations on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950;41(1):45–54. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1950.0132.
• Saadé A, Baron P, Noujeim Z, Azar D. Dental and skeletal age estimations in Lebanese children: a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(3):90–97. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_139_17.
• Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med. 2006;120:49–52. doi:10.1007/s00414-005-0047-9.
• Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973:211–227.
• Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(4):893–895. doi:10.1520/JFS15064J.
• Jeon KJ, Kim YH, Lee JY, Jung HI, Han SS. Dental Radiography for Age Estimation: A Scoping Review. J Korean Dent Sci. 2022;15(1):31–50.
• Kazemipoor M, Motallaei MN, Dehghani M. Digital panoramic radiography in dental age estimation. Biointerface Res in Appl Chem. 2021;11(3):10585–10594. doi:10.33263/BRIAC113.1058510594.
• Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;74(3):175–185. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-G.
• de Araujo PSP, Pinto PHV, da Silva RHA. Age estimation in adults by canine teeth: a systematic review of the Cameriere method with meta-analysis on the reliability of the pulp/tooth area ratio. Int J Leg Med. 2024;138(2):451–465. doi:10.1007/s00414-023-03110-1.
• Miranda JCd, Azevedo AdCS, Rocha M, Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MGH. Age estimation in Brazilian adults by Kvaal's and Cameriere's methods. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e051. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0051.
• Vila-Blanco N, Varas-Quintana P, Tomas I, Carreira MJ. A systematic overview of dental methods for age assessment in living individuals: from traditional to artificial intelligence-based approaches. Int J Leg Med. 2023;137(4):1117–1146. doi:10.1007/s00414-023-02960-z.
• Panchbhai A. Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Res. 2011;40(4):199–212. doi:10.1259/dmfr/19478385.
• Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk R, Zerilli A. A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: the two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37(5):1373–1379. doi:10.1520/JFS13327J.
• Gustafson G. Age estimation up to 16 years of age based on dental development. Odontol Revy. 1974;25:297–306.
• Sakuma A, Saitoh H, Suzuki Y, Makino Y, Inokuchi G, Hayakawa M, et al. Age estimation based on pulp cavity to tooth volume ratio using postmortem computed tomography images. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(6):1531–1535. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12175.
• Tardivo D, Sastre J, Ruquet M, Thollon L, Adalian P, Leonetti G, et al. Three-dimensional modeling of the various volumes of canines to determine age and sex: a preliminary study. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(3):766–770. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01720.x.
• Prapanpoch S, Dove SB, Cottone JA. Morphometric analysis of the dental pulp chamber as a method of age determination in humans. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1992;13(1):50–55.
• Meinl A, Tangl S, Pernicka E, Fenes C, Watzek G. On the applicability of secondary dentin formation to radiological age estimation in young adults. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):438–441. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00377.x.
• Landa M, Garamendi P, Botella M, Alemán I. Application of the method of Kvaal et al. to digital orthopantomograms. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123:123–128. doi:10.1007/s00414-008-0268-9.
• Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B. Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms—a contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119(1):27–30. doi:10.1007/s00414-004-0492-x.
• Bosmans N, Ann P, Aly M, Willems G. The application of Kvaal's dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;153(2-3):208–212. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.017.
• Erbudak HO, Özbek M, Uysal S, Karabulut E. Application of Kvaal et al.'s age estimation method to panoramic radiographs from Turkish individuals. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219(1-3):141–146. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.012.
• Misirlioglu M, Nalcaci R, Adisen MZ, Yilmaz S, Yorubulut S. Age estimation using maxillary canine pulp/tooth area ratio, with an application of Kvaal's methods on digital orthopantomographs in a Turkish sample. Am J Forensic Sci. 2014;46(1):27–38. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.784357.
• Saxena S. Age estimation of Indian adults from orthopantomograms. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:225–229. doi:10.1590/S1806-83242011005000009.
• Kırzıoğlu Z, Ceyhan D. Accuracy of different dental age estimation methods on Turkish children. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;216(1-3):61–67. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.08.018.
• Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, Olze A. Age estimation. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165(2-3):178–181. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.016.
• Raadsheer M, Van Eijden T, Van Ginkel F, Prahl-Andersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res. 1999;78(1):31–42. doi:10.1177/00220345990780010.
• Sondang P, Kumagai H, Tanaka E, Ozaki H, Nikawa H, Tanne K, et al. Correlation between maximum bite force and craniofacial morphology of young adults in Indonesia. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(11):1109–1117. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01163.x.
• Chandler NP, Pitt Ford T, Monteith BD. Coronal pulp size in molars: a study of bitewing radiographs. Int Endod J. 2003;36(11):757–763. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00726.x.
• Hanihara T, Ishida H. Metric dental variation of major human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128(2):287–298. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20080.