Membrane Repositioning Techniques to Stabilize Graft Material in Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Radiographic Study
Abstract
Purpose This retrospective study compares the effects of free-lay (FL) and tucked/adapted (TK) collagen membrane placement on vertical bone height (BH) in 2D radiographs after maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) with the lateral window approach. Materials & Methods Patients who underwent MSA between 2020 and 2025 were included in this study. In all cases, a collagen membrane was placed to cover the lateral window. Membranes were stabilized either as a free lay or by tucking the margins between the sinus wall and the graft. Panoramic radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at postoperative day 7, month 2, month 6, and the final follow-up to assess BH. Results Fifty-six patients were analyzed (FL, n = 35; TK, n = 21). BH decreased significantly over the follow-up period. Technique-by-time interactions were not statistically significant, and after adjustment, the membrane technique was not an independent predictor of bone height change. Greater mesiodistal graft width was found to be correlated with higher BH values. The staged approach was linked to higher level of BH reduction in the long term. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, TK technique showed no measurable benefit over free-lay coverage in preserving BH after maxillary MSA. Prospective studies using CBCT-based volumetric endpoints and direct evaluation of graft displacement are recommended.
Keywords
References
- "1. Omori Y, Nakajima Y, Imai H, Yonezawa D, Ferri M, Apaza Al-ccayhuaman KA, et al. Influence of Anatomical Parameters on the Dimensions of the Subantral Space and Sinus Mucosa Thickening after Sinus Floor Elevation. A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(7). doi:10.3390/dj9070076.
- 2. Testori T, Mandelli F, Valentini P, Wallace S. A novel technique to prevent the loss of graft material through the antrostomy after sinus surgery: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(3):e272–4. doi:10.11607/jomi.3367.
- 3. Molina A, Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Ortiz-Vigón A, Sanz M. Complications in sinus lifting procedures: Classification and management. Periodontology 2000. 2022;88(1):103–115. doi:10.1111/prd.12414.
- 4. Alsharekh MS, Almutairi AA, Jahlan AS, Alhazani AS, Al-mohaimeed SM, Aljnoubi LA, et al. Evolving Techniques and Trends in Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedures in Implant Dentistry: A Review of Contemporary Advances. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71424. doi:10.7759/cureus.71424.
- 5. Ohayon L, Taschieri S, Friedmann A, Del Fabbro M. Bone Graft Displacement After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Covering Barrier Membrane: A Retrospective Com-puted Tomographic Image Evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(3):681–691. doi:10.11607/jomi.6940.
- 6. Yeniyol S, Özlü Uçan G. Short-term retrospective analysis of radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with xenograft and simultaneous dental implant placement: a two-dimensional radiographic study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1920. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07356-6.
- 7. Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkate CM. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary si-nus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radio-graphic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(7):691–700. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01697.x.
- 8. Park WB, Herr Y, Chung JH, Shin SI, Han JY, Lim HC. Compari-son of three approaches for treating the bony access window in lateral sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22888. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-74076-2.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Oral Implantology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Emrah Bilen
*
0000-0002-3135-355X
Türkiye
Publication Date
August 30, 2026
Submission Date
May 4, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 8, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 53 Number: 2